See All Articles

The Menu Has Changed: Why the New Language of Protest Is a Nightmare for This Government

Look at that young man, a poster in his hand, slicing through the crowd. The words on it are no polite petition. They cut like a blade: "Modi ji, now you alone can save this country — by resigning. It is better to die standing than to live on your knees." A few steps away, another banner invokes Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s poem: "I will not accept defeat, nor will I pick a quarrel. On the forehead of time, I write and erase. I do not sing a song." And right beside it, Che Guevara stares back. The protest at Jantar Mantar has not just gathered bodies; it has overturned every known symbol, every familiar idiom of dissent. Something fundamental has shifted in the political language of India, and those in power seem utterly incapable of reading it.

Gone are the days when the cry was wrapped in constitutional piety. During the anti-CAA movement, cutouts of the Preamble were held aloft, its text recited like a mantra. That language was formal, respectful, grounded in the letter of the law. And it was ignored. So the people have now invented a new grammar, one that refuses to flinch. This is not the language of political parties; it was not scripted in a war room. If political parties were behind these protests, the slogans would smell of old style — familiar, stale, safe. But here, the words belong to the street, and they carry a raw, unforgiving politics.

From Constitution to Monkey: The Rise of Irreverence

The prime minister once famously declared himself the "Pradhan Sevak" — the prime servant — borrowing a phrase that history had long associated with Nehru. For a decade, that branding was a shield. Today, the public has shredded that very line. At Jantar Mantar, "Mann Ki Baat" — the prime minister’s monthly radio address — has been twisted into "Monkey Ki Baat". The wordplay is merciless, cutting through the carefully built aura of authority. Young protesters address the prime minister with "tu" and "bro", a deliberate discarding of all titles. “Bro, tu kaun hai? Why don’t you just leave?” one poster reads. Another snarls: “56-inch ka chhota bandar, bhaag Narendra bhaag” — tag the 56-inch chest as a small monkey, and order it to run. This is not mere humour. It is a surgical removal of fear. The leader who was projected as larger than life, an infallible Vishwaguru, is being brought down to a meme.

This transformation in language is a direct consequence of a government that treats formal, reasoned protest with contempt. When the constitutional approach was stonewalled, when every appeal to the rulebook was met with silence, a space opened up. Into that space rushed the language of Instagram, YouTube, and the so-called "Godi media" channels. The BJP, too, has long nurtured a coarse digital vocabulary — full of taunts and aggression. But this time, the same weapon has been turned back on its makers. The difference is, the people’s slang is not manufactured in a studio; it reeks of genuine anger. And that is terrifying for any regime that depends on a wall of curated spectacle.

When 'Achhe Din' Leaked

The paper leak scandals — NEET, NET, and countless state-level exams — have detonated a new layer of mocking. The comparison is devastating: sanitary pads and diapers do not leak, but exam papers do. A poster demands, “Achhe din kab leak honge?” — when will the promise of good days finally leak out? For a decade, the catchphrase "Achhe Din Aane Wale Hain" was a weapon of electoral seduction. Now, it is ammunition for the public. The question is no longer when good days will come, but when they will leak — as if they too are a flawed product, held together by nothing but spin. The metaphor is sharper than any opposition speech. It mocks the entire architecture of hope on which this government was re-elected.

The anger over paper leaks is not merely about youth unemployment. It is about the realisation that merit has been rigged, that the system is being hollowed out while the prime minister speaks of startups and digital India. The young are done with listening. They are writing their own slogans, and in them, the prime minister is addressed as a peer, a fellow mortal, a bro who has failed. This is the death of deference.

The Ladli Behna Fraud and the Defiance of Women

Consider the curious case of the Ladli Behna Yojana in Madhya Pradesh. During the election, 1.25 crore women were promised Rs 1,500 a month. The BJP spoke of even increasing the amount. After the victory, the government discovered that 8 lakh of those women were suddenly "ineligible". They were removed from the rolls. So the question stands: if they were never eligible, why was money deposited into their accounts for months? Was a massive fraud committed to buy votes? The scheme, like so many others, appears to have been a transaction, not a gift. And now, at Jantar Mantar, women are raising not just their voices but their bodies as shields.

Images from Mumbai are instructive. Women stand before police vans, before bulldozers, and the vehicles retreat. This is a new physical language of resistance. Where once the fear of the state would scatter a crowd, now young women plant themselves and refuse to move. They are not just asking why they were removed from a list. They are telling the government: you cannot buy us for Rs 1,500. The state’s machinery, which was once used to intimidate, now confronts a courage that does not blink. The government, which speaks of "Nari Shakti" in glossy advertisements, is meeting the real force of women who have learned to question. And it has no answer.

Burger Politics: When Swiggy Became a Weapon

Who would have imagined that a fast-food platform could become a tool of protest? At Jantar Mantar, orders started pouring in through Zomato and Swiggy — burgers, pizzas, rolls — sent by supporters from across cities. The message was unmistakable: the food of the "spoiled elite", the burger that was once scorned as a symbol of deracinated youth, was now the fuel of a people’s movement. The BJP, which has spent a decade manufacturing a cultural nationalism centred on "kheer, puri, and sanskar", found its culinary politics turned upside down. The burger has arrived in Indian politics with full dignity.

Recall that Zomato itself had once experimented with separate uniforms for vegetarian and non-vegetarian delivery partners — green and red respectively — until a backlash forced it to withdraw the plan. The platform can be used by the state to gather intimate data about citizens. But the same platform was repurposed by citizens to nourish a protest. In Pakistan, the word "burger" is a slur for westernised, Urdu-averse youth. In India, the burger has become a symbol of a new solidarity that cuts across class and caste, fed by digital apps and shared anger. The menu has truly changed, and the government, still dreaming of a khadi-clad past, has been caught off guard.

The Artificial Rallies and the Vanishing Public

Compare the scenes at a BJP rally with what is unfolding at Jantar Mantar. A prime minister’s public meeting today is a choreographed act of distance. Massive stages soar high above the ground. Tele-screens beam the leader’s face, but the crowd is seated far away, behind layers of barricades. The VIP area keeps swelling, the press is pushed out, and the so-called "public" is reduced to a backdrop. People are paid, bussed in, and made to sit on chairs. The raw, sweaty, shoulder-rubbing chaos that defined political rallies — where languages collided, smells mingled, and bodies jostled — has been sanitised into a product. The prime minister’s rallies are like luxury events, funded by thousands of crores in electoral bonds. The leader appears like a deity on a flower-bedecked chariot, but the earthy language of the street has been sent to exile.

The opposition, ironically, was forced to walk the old path. Denied the money and the media glare, Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Yatra saw him right in the middle of crowds, his bus often swamped by people. Akhilesh Yadav, during his press conferences, sits in a hall overflowing with party workers and journalists, laughter echoing. When Delhi Police detained him, his bus filled with Samajwadi Party leaders and they turned the detention into a moving caravan of defiance. This is not a statement about political parties; it is about two competing styles of engaging with the public. The BJP has built a wall of splendour around itself, and now the public has found a way to hurl retorts over that wall.

The Sangh’s Hindi Has Been Rejected

A strange vacuum was visible even during the Ram Mandir inauguration. The commentary on Doordarshan was filled with ornamental Hindi, peppered with Tulsidas, but it lacked the flavour of the living tongue. The Sangh’s project — to impose a sanskritised, high-caste cultural glory onto the language of the people — has not only failed but backfired. The universities that the Sangh claims to control produce young people whose language seems to come from entirely elsewhere. The "jan" has dumped their script. The BJP and its ideological fountainhead invested heavily in a particular style of Hindi, a deliberately archaic and "pure" register intended to evoke Hindu pride. But on the ground, that language carries no energy. It cannot even sustain a viral meme.

When the people were denied a hearing in the language of the Constitution, they did not elevate themselves to that language; they dragged the ruler down to theirs. And their language is blunt, funny, abusive when necessary, and soaked in pop culture. It speaks of "bro", of "bandar", of "leaked papers", of "Zomato orders". It does not wait for permission. This is the real death blow to the cultural hegemony the Sangh has been trying to erect. A society surrounded by the Sangh’s machinery in power has still rejected its words. And if the words are rejected, the ideology they carry cannot be far behind.

The Language of Laughter Returns

For years, fear had sealed the throats of comedians. One by one, they were attacked, dragged to court, pushed into a corner. The comedy stage was half-lit, the audience consigned to darkness — as if to ensure that laughing faces would not catch the government’s eye. The prime minister and the home minister had spread fear so wide that even humour felt like sedition. But now, the public has stolen that language back. Kunal Kamra, Varun Grover, Prashasti Singh, Piyush Human — their words have become the vocabulary of the street. The crowd at Jantar Mantar is not just chanting; it is laughing, mocking, inventing songs: "Policewale babu, danda laga do, aawaaz jo uthhi hai, use kaise daba do." The stick is being asked for, almost demanded, because the fear of the lathi has been eclipsed by a craving for martyrdom. Some protesters even complain — half in jest — that they haven't been beaten yet. FoMO over lathi charge? That is the measure of how far the administration’s terror has crumbled.

The opposition parties, historically anxious about such irreverence, are simply bystanders here. Their leaders stick to parliamentary language, careful not to slip. But the people have no such restraint. They have made the prime minister, once a figure of awe, into the subject of the most biting joke. And when a ruler becomes a joke, their aura evaporates. The giggle is the most democratic weapon of all.

Old Symbols, New Meanings: A Comparison

Traditional Protest Symbol	New Protest Symbol at Jantar Mantar
Constitutional preamble cutouts	Posters calling Modi "bro" and "bandar"
Gandhian peaceful marches	Swiggy/Zomato burger deliveries to protesters
Sanskrit shlokas and slogans	Bhojpuri-inflected street rhymes mocking police
Demands for policy change in formal language	Sarcastic queries: "Achhe din kab leak honge?"
Opposition leaders carrying their party flags	Ordinary youth carrying posters of Vajpayee's poetry and Che Guevara
Fear of lathi charge	Women standing before bulldozers, longing for confrontation

Criticisms

The following are observations on governance, politics, and public conduct, drawn from the unfolding reality. They are stated in the passive voice, as the situation demands a shift in perspective from actor to action.

• Fear is systematically manufactured by projecting the prime minister as an infallible deity, only for that fear to be shattered by irreverent public language.
• Electoral victories are secured through fraudulent promises — such as the Ladli Behna Yojana — where money is deposited temporarily and then withdrawn after the polls.
• A grand, choreographed distance is created between the leader and the public, with rallies funded by opaque electoral bonds, turning citizens into paid audience members.
• The constitutional, respectful language of dissent is deliberately ignored and stifled, forcing the people to adopt crude, dismissive slang as the only means of being heard.
• Cultural nationalism is enforced by the Sangh through a heavily sanskritised Hindi that fails to connect with the living language of the masses, and is ultimately rejected by the very society it aims to control.
• Comedians and satirists are harassed, legal cases are filed, and performance spaces are shrunk to prevent collective laughter from exposing the government’s fallibility.
• Public platforms like Zomato and Swiggy are exploited by the state for data collection, while the same platforms are repurposed by citizens to sustain protest, embarrassing the surveillance apparatus.
• Exam paper leaks are allowed to become routine, destroying the future of millions, while the government diverts attention with nationalist rhetoric.
• The office of the prime minister is reduced to a brand, its emotional charge eroded through hollow repetition of slogans like “Pradhan Sevak,” until the public turns it into a punchline.
• Essential public discourse on employment and education is crowded out by a manufactured spectacle of “vikas” that has no foundation in the ground reality of paper leaks and joblessness.
• A deep-rooted confusion is cultivated around food politics: the same party that condemns fish consumption in Bihar displays fish-eating to woo voters elsewhere, revealing a bankrupt cultural strategy.

The menu has indeed changed. The board outside the restaurant still says the same name, but the kitchen is no longer serving what it once did. The government that mastered the art of selling symbols has now been trapped by its own product. The people have tasted a different meal — one spiced with mockery, digital solidarity, and an unbreakable nerve — and they are not going back to the stale thaali of deference. The language of the street has poured into the political theatre, and all the expensive sets are crumbling. The prime servant stands alone, addressed as "bro", and there is no reply.

This is the new India. And no scriptwriter in the BJP’s backroom can rewrite it.