The Oil War (in last 3 days) - by Ravish Kumar

See All News by Ravish Kumar
<<< Previously

2026-MAR-14 1900

An Oil War Expands While Diplomacy Fails and Ordinary People Pay the Price

FACTS

• The United States carried out a major strike on Iran’s Kharg Island, through which Iran exports about 90% of its crude oil. Donald Trump said the island’s military infrastructure was destroyed, while Iran’s Fars News Agency claimed work resumed within an hour.

• The attack came after markets closed, was reportedly linked to a B-2 bomber mission, and was followed by U.S. orders to deploy a Marine Expeditionary Unit and an amphibious force toward the Middle East.

• Israeli strikes set Tehran’s oil depots on fire, while Iran responded with missile attacks and threats linked to shipping and regional energy infrastructure, deepening fears around Hormuz and Gulf supply routes.

• French President Emmanuel Macron, after speaking on March 12 with leaders connected to the Lebanon-Syria crisis, said Hezbollah had made a grave mistake by dragging Lebanon into war and said Israel should stop ground operations.

• India was already feeling the economic fallout: crude oil was nearing $100 per barrel, commercial gas shortages were affecting hostels, canteens, and food outlets, and the central government had arranged a ₹57,000 crore fund to manage the pressure.

CRITICISMS

• The United States has turned this into a larger oil war, hitting vital infrastructure and pushing the region closer to a wider catastrophe instead of containing the conflict.

• Washington talks with swagger and contradiction: it says sea routes are open even as ships are under attack, and it displays the damage it causes while keeping quiet about its own losses.

• Israel is setting entire regions on fire, ordering civilians to leave, denying or blurring the scale of its ground actions, and leaving behind displacement, destruction, and fear.

• Narendra Modi’s government has compromised India’s energy security by bending to American pressure, staying silent on the war, and leaving ordinary people to suffer the consequences through shortages and rising prices.

• BRICS has shown political weakness and selective morality by failing to speak clearly on attacks on Iran even though Iran is one of its own members.

2026-MAR-13 1900

Delayed Diplomacy, Hormuz Anxiety, and the Price India Is Paying for War

FACTS

• Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian for the first time on the 13th day of the war, after earlier speaking with Gulf leaders and with Benjamin Netanyahu.

• The rupee fell to ₹92.42 against the dollar, while Indian markets saw a sharp selloff: the Sensex dropped 1,470 points, the Nifty fell 488 points, and the Sensex was said to be down nearly 11,000 points over three months.

• Modi’s public statement after the call said India was concerned about rising tensions, loss of life, damage to infrastructure, the safety of Indian citizens, and uninterrupted movement of goods and energy.

• External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar spoke with Iran’s foreign minister, and India’s foreign ministry later said shipping security and India’s energy security were discussed, though no clear public confirmation was given about passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

• Reports cited in the video said LPG shortages were affecting daily life in India: Infosys advised employees to bring food from home because menus were limited, around 100 hotels in Kochi were shut due to LPG shortage, and sectors from restaurants to hospitals and community kitchens were under pressure.

CRITICISMS

• Narendra Modi called Iran too late. If the relationship were truly strong, a call would not have waited until the thirteenth day of war, especially when the crisis directly threatened India’s citizens, trade routes, and energy supply.

• S. Jaishankar said too little on a matter of enormous national importance. Iran’s side spoke in detail, while India reduced major diplomatic conversations to thin, vague lines that left the public guessing.

• India avoided clearly condemning the attacks on Iran even while holding the BRICS chair, and that silence allowed Iran to remind India of its responsibility instead of India taking a firm stand on its own.

• BJP and much of the “Godi” media turned an unverified claim about Hormuz access into a propaganda victory, celebrating a diplomatic triumph that neither side had clearly confirmed.

• The government kept denying or downplaying the domestic crisis even as LPG shortages, rising costs, falling markets, and energy insecurity were already hitting workers, businesses, and ordinary households.

2026-MAR-13 1500

The Gulf’s Illusion Has Broken: America Cannot Guarantee Security, and Israel Wants to Define the Region

FACTS

• Four crew members were confirmed dead after a U.S. KC-135 Stratotanker was destroyed over Iraq; the Islamic Resistance in Iraq claimed responsibility, while the U.S. military said the aircraft went down in friendly territory without clearly explaining how.

• Reports cited in the video said Iran struck U.S. military positions in Kuwait on 28 February, killing 6 soldiers; CBS News was also cited as saying 100–150 others may have been injured, with some seriously wounded sent to Germany.

• Haaretz was cited as reporting that 11 Iranian cluster missiles crossed Israel’s air defenses, and one missile dropped 70 bombs in central Israel.

• Iran’s new Supreme Leader, Sayyid Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei, said in his first message that Gulf countries should reconsider ties with Washington and shut down U.S. military bases on their soil because America cannot guarantee their peace or security.

• The Red Crescent was cited as saying that 24,000 civilian sites in Iran had been attacked, including more than 19,000 residential locations; at the same time, the IRGC warned that any protests would be crushed even more harshly than in January.

CRITICISMS

• America is no security guarantee for the Gulf. Countries that stood with Washington have still seen embassies shut, factories close, energy plants stop, and attacks continue around them.

• Netanyahu is speaking the language of domination, not peace. When he says Israel is a regional and global superpower, he is telling Gulf states to keep producing oil and gas but accept Israel as the boss.

• Israel wants Gulf countries to normalize relations on its terms, yet shows no interest in protecting them when missiles, drones, and economic disruption hit their cities and infrastructure.

• Trump keeps boasting that Iran has been destroyed, but if America is so strong, then why can it not secure the Gulf, protect shipping through Hormuz, or end the war on its own terms?

• Modi reacted too late and too weakly. Calling Iran only on the thirteenth day of war and still not condemning the killing of Khamenei shows hesitation at a moment when the crisis is already affecting India and the wider region.

2026-MAR-12 1900

When a Gas Shortage Becomes a “Rumour” and Speaking About It Becomes the Real Crime

FACTS

• The central government’s Home Secretary asked states to monitor and act against those spreading “rumours” about LPG shortage, and several states issued related orders.

• The government said that none of India’s 25,000 LPG distributors had reported any cylinder shortage, and that about 50 lakh cylinders are distributed every day.

• In Parliament and press briefings, the government maintained that there was no supply shortage; it said panic booking and hoarding at the distributor or retailer level were creating the appearance of scarcity.

• The petroleum secretary said the domestic LPG cylinder price in Delhi was ₹913 after a recent ₹60 increase, while Ujjwala beneficiaries were paying ₹613, with the government saying prices would have been even higher without intervention.

• Multiple reports and examples cited in the video pointed to disruption on the ground: canteens shifting to induction cooking, menu cuts, commercial establishments struggling, black-marketing raids in places like Meerut, and rising demand for alternative cooking arrangements such as bhattis in Lucknow.

CRITICISMS

• The government wants people to deny what they are seeing with their own eyes. Even if families are standing in line with cylinders, the public is being told not to say cylinders are unavailable.

• A real hardship is being turned into an “afwah” problem. Instead of honestly addressing shortage, delay, panic, or distribution failure, the state is threatening action against those who speak about it.

• The official story does not add up. On one side there is “no shortage,” and on the other side there is hoarding, panic booking, black-marketing raids, kerosene quota release, menu cuts, and emergency workarounds.

• Fear has been pushed so far that even reporting, posting a receipt, sharing a video from a queue, or discussing no-gas recipes begins to look risky. The message is clear: silence is safer than truth.

• “Godi” media and the IT cell live under selective immunity. Ordinary people, shopkeepers, YouTubers, and opposition voices face the pressure of being branded rumor-mongers, while propaganda continues without consequence.

2026-MAR-12 1500

This War Is No Longer About Frontlines Alone — It Is About Oil Routes, Political Ego, and the Price Paid by Ordinary People

FACTS

• Iran’s president said the war can end only if the United States and Israel accept Iran’s lawful rights, pay compensation for the damage caused, and guarantee that Iran will not be attacked again.

• Reports cited in the video said Iran was laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz; U.S. Central Command confirmed the destruction of 16 vessels, while Trump claimed 28 had been destroyed.

• Since 28 February, only 66 ships were said to have crossed Hormuz, insurance costs on ships had risen sharply, and attacks or attempted attacks were reported on ships and oil-related targets near Iraq, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Kuwait, Bahrain, and the wider Gulf region.

• India’s foreign minister and Iran’s foreign minister were said to have spoken three times, with the last conversation covering shipping security and India’s energy security, but reports about guaranteed passage for Indian-flagged ships through Hormuz were described as unconfirmed.

• Crude oil was said to have crossed $100 a barrel, global markets were falling, and India’s Sensex was described as having dropped as much as 9,787 points from its 1 December 2025 peak of 86,169.

CRITICISMS

• Trump and Netanyahu have turned war into spectacle. One keeps issuing lines and boasts, the other stays silent in a way that shows he has no desire to let the war stop.

• Netanyahu does not want this war to end, because the real decisions are no longer being made with Iran but in the power equation between Netanyahu and Trump.

• The media has stripped war of its human pain. It shows B-1s, B-2s, missiles, charts, and runways, but pushes aside the bodies, the destroyed schools and hospitals, and the families erased by bombing.

• America keeps claiming Iran has been crushed, but if that were true, Hormuz would not still be a threat, ships would not still be burning, and the Gulf would not still be in fear.

• Modi’s silence stands out. When Indian kitchens, fuel costs, and more than a crore Indians in Gulf countries are tied to this crisis, the absence of any reported Modi-Pezeshkian call looks like a serious political failure.

LPG Crisis Sparks Political Firestorm as Arvind Kejriwal Targets Modi’s Foreign Policy

See All on Politics    <<< Previously

Kejriwal Blames Modi’s Foreign Policy for LPG Crisis, Accuses PM of “Dragging India into Global Conflict”

As India grapples with a severe shortage of LPG cooking gas, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has launched a fierce attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, accusing him of abandoning India’s traditional diplomatic neutrality and pushing the country into a geopolitical crisis that is now hurting ordinary citizens and businesses.

Speaking about the rapidly developing situation, Kejriwal warned that the LPG shortage could lead to widespread economic disruption, including the closure of thousands of restaurants and factories and the possible loss of over one crore jobs.

But beyond the immediate economic consequences, Kejriwal placed the blame squarely on what he described as “reckless foreign policy decisions” taken by the Modi government.

---

LPG Supply Shock Hits the Country

Kejriwal explained that India depends heavily on imported LPG. Around 60% of the country’s LPG supply is imported, and nearly 90% of those imports pass through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

With tensions escalating in the Middle East involving Iran, Israel, and the United States, shipments through the route have reportedly been disrupted for India.

According to Kejriwal, the result is a dramatic supply shock.

“Nearly 90% of our imported LPG has effectively stopped, which means the country’s total supply has dropped by around 50–55%,” he said.

Restaurants and hotels have been hit first because they rely on daily LPG deliveries and cannot stockpile cylinders due to safety rules.

In Mumbai, he said, about 20% of restaurants have already shut down, and that number could reach 50% within days if supplies do not resume. In Tamil Nadu, nearly 10,000 hotels and restaurants are reportedly on the verge of closure. Similar disruptions are expected in Punjab and Delhi NCR, he warned.

The timing could not be worse, he added, pointing out that the crisis has struck during India’s peak wedding season, when the hospitality sector is typically at its busiest.

Industrial regions could soon follow. Kejriwal cited Morbi in Gujarat, a major tile manufacturing hub, where hundreds of factories depend on gas supplies.

“If industries shut down at this scale, more than one crore people could suddenly lose their jobs,” he warned.

---

“India Had No Stake in This War”

However, Kejriwal argued that the root cause of the crisis lies not only in global conflict but in what he described as a major diplomatic blunder by the Modi government.

According to him, India historically followed a policy of neutrality through the Non-Aligned Movement, maintaining balanced relations even during major global conflicts.

Kejriwal accused Modi of abandoning that tradition.

“India had no stake in this war,” he said. “We should not have taken sides. But the Prime Minister chose to stand openly with Israel and the United States.”

He specifically criticized Modi for visiting Israel and publicly embracing its leadership shortly before tensions escalated.

“Why did the Prime Minister go to Israel just a day before the conflict intensified?” Kejriwal asked. “Why did he publicly hug its leadership at such a sensitive moment? Those actions signaled that India had chosen a side.”

According to him, this shift alienated Iran — a country he described as a long-time partner of India.

---

“India Being Reduced to an American Colony”

Kejriwal’s sharpest remarks were directed at what he called India’s growing dependence on Washington.

He alleged that Modi has increasingly aligned India’s policies with those of former U.S. President Donald Trump, even when it harms India’s own economic interests.

“Prime Minister Modi has made the mistake of turning India into an American colony,” Kejriwal said.

He cited the earlier decision to reduce oil purchases from Russia under U.S. pressure, arguing that the move damaged industries and agriculture across India.

“Millions of farmers suffered, industries shut down, and jobs were lost — all because the government followed Washington’s instructions,” he claimed.

Kejriwal went further, accusing Modi of humiliating India on the global stage.

“Every day, small officials in America mock India and our Prime Minister on television,” he said. “The country that once commanded respect around the world is now being treated like a subordinate.”

---

A Call for Accountability

Kejriwal concluded with a direct challenge to the prime minister, demanding that India’s foreign policy be guided by national interests rather than external pressure.

“If there are compulsions or secrets forcing the Prime Minister to act this way, he should resign,” Kejriwal said.

“India’s foreign policy should serve the interests of 140 crore Indians — not the interests of another country.”

With the LPG crisis escalating and geopolitical tensions still unfolding, Kejriwal’s remarks are likely to intensify the political debate over India’s foreign policy and its economic consequences at home.

Tags: Hindi,Video,Arvind Kejriwal,Indian Politics,

Iran will bomb banks; attack on Tehran bank; gas cylinder crisis in India spirals out of control

See All News by Ravish Kumar
<<< Previously    Next >>>

Five key developments about the bombing of an Iranian bank and Iran’s follow-up statements:

• Airstrike on Iranian bank: A bank building in Tehran linked to Bank Sepah, one of Iran’s largest state banks with ties to the military, was hit in an overnight strike attributed by Iran to the United States and Israel. Reuters

• Iran calls it an escalation: Iranian military officials said attacking a financial institution was an “illegitimate and unprecedented” move, expanding the war from military targets to economic infrastructure. Reuters

• Threat to retaliate against banks: Iran’s military command warned that it now considers banks and economic institutions linked to the U.S. and Israel across the Middle East legitimate targets in retaliation. The Wall Street Journal+1

• Civilian warning issued: Iranian authorities advised civilians to stay far away from bank buildings, indicating concern that financial institutions could become targets in the escalating conflict. The Wall Street Journal

• Expansion to wider economic targets: Iranian statements also suggested potential attacks on regional economic infrastructure and technology companies connected to U.S. or Israeli military systems, signaling a broader economic dimension to the war. https://www.oneindia.com/

---

War Is Never Far Away

War is always introduced to the public as strategy. A map is shown. A spokesman appears. A phrase like “measured response” is repeated until it starts sounding like wisdom. But war does not enter ordinary life as strategy. It enters as shortage, anxiety, queues, cancellations, rumours, higher prices, and the sudden discovery that a narrow strip of water thousands of kilometres away can decide what happens in your kitchen.

By March 10–11, 2026, the war involving the U.S., Israel and Iran had already badly disrupted traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, pushed oil prices sharply higher, shaken Indian markets, weakened the rupee, and forced India to invoke emergency steps to protect cooking-gas supplies. The world may call this geopolitics. The public experiences it as cost. Reuters+4Reuters+4U.S. Energy Information Administration+4

That is the first lie of war: that the battlefield is somewhere else. It is not somewhere else. It is in the LPG booking message that says wait. It is in the airline cancellation notice. It is in the freight bill, the refinery shutdown, the insurance premium, the fertilizer cost, the market fall, the silent household calculation about what can be delayed and what cannot.

Hormuz Is Not Just a Waterway. It Is a Trigger.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most consequential chokepoints in the global economy. The U.S. Energy Information Administration says flows through it in 2024 and early 2025 accounted for more than a quarter of total global seaborne oil trade and about one-fifth of global oil and petroleum product consumption. Around one-fifth of global LNG trade also moved through Hormuz in 2024, and 83% of that LNG went to Asian markets, with China, India and South Korea among the top destinations. U.S. Energy Information Administration+1

So when politicians speak casually about escalation in this region, they are not speaking casually about a distant military theatre. They are speaking casually about the bloodstream of Asian energy security. They are speaking casually about the costs that will travel to India, not as ideology but as invoices.

The market understands this before television anchors do. The EIA said Brent crude rose to $94 per barrel on March 9 and forecast it would stay above $95 over the next two months under its conflict assumptions. Reuters reported that the war had already effectively halted shipments through Hormuz, where about a fifth of global oil and LNG normally passes. Reuters+2U.S. Energy Information Administration+2

Oil does not wait for official speeches to end. It reacts to fear. Shipping reacts to risk. Insurance reacts to uncertainty. And by the time governments say “do not panic,” the public already knows there is something to panic about.

When a Superpower Starts Bluffing

Nothing exposes the fragility of power faster than a moment when power begins to perform control instead of exercising it.

On March 10, the U.S. energy secretary posted on X that the U.S. Navy had successfully escorted an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz. The post was later deleted. The White House then said no such escort had happened. Reuters also reported that the U.S. Navy had so far refused near-daily industry requests for military escorts through the strait, even as the Pentagon said it was looking at options. Reuters+1

This matters far beyond one embarrassing post. In a war zone tied to the world’s most sensitive energy corridor, a false signal from a senior official is not a small communications slip. It is a glimpse into the psychology of wartime governance: create an impression of control first, sort out reality later.

The strongest powers in the world often look the strongest when they are speaking. The real test comes when ships must move, airspace must remain open, refineries must keep running, and markets must believe that somebody is actually in charge. Here, that confidence is cracking.

Precision for Whom?

The vocabulary of modern war has become indecent. “Precision.” “Targeted.” “Limited.” These are words used by people who do not stand in line for gas cylinders and do not sit in hospital corridors after an airstrike.

Reuters reported on March 11 that the World Health Organization had verified 18 attacks on healthcare centers in Iran since the war began on February 28, with eight health-worker deaths. The WHO also warned that toxic “black rain” and compounds in the air after strikes on oil facilities could cause respiratory problems. Reuters had earlier reported damage to Tehran’s Gandhi hospital area after strikes. Reuters+2Reuters+2

Once hospitals enter the picture, once public health warnings begin to mention toxic air, once displacement rises into the hundreds of thousands, the language of “precision” begins to sound like satire. The bomb is always described with precision. The consequences never are.

This is how war grows. First it is military. Then it is infrastructural. Then it is economic. Then humanitarian. Then domestic. Then intimate.

Dubai and the End of the Immunity Myth

For years, the Gulf sold a particular fantasy to the world: that enough glass, steel, finance and aviation could build immunity from geography. But geography always returns.

Reuters reported on March 11 that two drones fell near Dubai airport, four people were injured, Bahrain relocated some aircraft, and the wider conflict had already caused tens of thousands of flight cancellations, reroutings and schedule changes worldwide. Reuters described the aviation disruption as the industry’s worst crisis since the pandemic. The same report noted that Dubai airport, the world’s busiest global passenger hub, had already been damaged earlier in the conflict, alongside airports in Abu Dhabi and Kuwait. Reuters+1

This is what modern war looks like when it collides with modern logistics. Airports become symbols not of mobility, but of vulnerability. Transit hubs become choke points. Premium air corridors become zones of anxiety. The glossy promise of seamless globalisation ends the moment a drone falls near a runway.

The same pattern is visible in energy infrastructure. Reuters reported that roughly 1.9 million barrels per day of refining capacity across Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar had shut as a result of the war. Reuters

So this is no longer a story that can be confined to maps of military operations. It is a story about the operating system of daily life being placed under stress: fuel, aviation, supply chains, pricing, risk, and public confidence.

In India, War Arrives as a Cylinder Shortage

This is where the distance collapses. A war near Iran reaches India not as theory but as fuel stress.

Reuters reported that India on March 11 asked consumers not to panic about gas supplies and to conserve energy wherever possible. The government invoked emergency powers, ordered refiners to maximise LPG output, cut industrial sales, and moved to protect supplies for roughly 333 million homes with LPG connections. Reuters also reported that India consumed 33.15 million metric tons of cooking gas last year; imports accounted for about 60% of demand, and about 90% of those imports came from the Middle East. India also imports about half its gas consumption. Reuters+1

Read those numbers carefully. This is not a minor inconvenience. This is structural exposure. A country that speaks the language of strategic autonomy cannot afford this level of fragility in the fuel that reaches its households.

Reuters had already reported on March 6 that India invoked emergency powers after Middle East-related supply disruptions, and that imports account for about two-thirds of LPG consumption, with 85%–90% of that supply tied to the Middle East. The same report said India has about 332 million active LPG consumers. Reuters

This is the moment when geopolitics stops being a debate among experts and becomes a domestic reality. The citizen may not know the shipping map of Hormuz. The citizen should not have to. A functioning state is supposed to know the map so well that the citizen never has to suffer for it.

Markets Smell Fear Faster Than Governments Admit It

Markets often behave with more honesty than governments. They do not care for speeches. They price risk.

Reuters reported that on March 11 the Nifty 50 fell 1.6% and the Sensex fell 1.7% as war fears and oil volatility hit sentiment. Reuters also reported that the rupee weakened to 92.04 per dollar. At the same time, gas-linked stocks rose after the government redirected supplies, with Adani Total Gas up 20%, Gujarat Gas up 4%, and Indraprastha Gas up 3.5%. Reuters+2Reuters+2

That is the market’s blunt moral lesson. Pain is never distributed equally. Households worry about access. Traders worry about timing. Some companies lose. Some rally. A family asks whether the next cylinder will come on time; a stock surges because scarcity has entered the system.

War does not merely destroy. It rearranges advantage. It creates winners inside a landscape of general insecurity. That is why official language becomes so hollow. The public is told to stay calm, while the system quietly begins sorting people into those who can absorb the shock and those who cannot.

A War Without an Exit Plan

If leaders had even a convincing plan for ending this war, the public might still be asked to endure pain, but at least the pain would be tied to some coherent argument. What we see instead is escalation without visible closure.

Reuters reported that U.S. lawmakers emerged from classified briefings with deep concerns about the war’s cost, duration and risk of expansion. Senator Richard Blumenthal said the United States seemed to be on a path toward deploying troops on the ground in Iran, while Reuters also reported that President Trump had not ruled out such a move. Separately, Reuters reported that Democratic senators demanded immediate hearings on the war. Reuters+1

When even those receiving classified briefings are asking basic questions about direction, cost and scope, why should the public accept the performance of certainty on television?

A war without an exit plan is not strength. It is improvisation with missiles.

The Real Bill Is Paid by Ordinary People

The deepest fraud in modern war is moral, not military. Leaders speak of deterrence, stability, peace, security. Ordinary people experience queue, inflation, fear, delay, and grief.

The WHO said on March 11 that more than 100,000 people in Iran had relocated and up to 700,000 in Lebanon had been internally displaced. It also warned that healthcare disruption and poor living conditions were raising the risks of disease outbreaks. Reuters

So who exactly is this war stabilising? Which peace is being built through damaged hospitals, toxic air, shut refineries, threatened airspace, shaken markets and kitchen-level shortages? What kind of order arrives through emergency powers and public advisories telling people not to panic?

It is always the same arrangement. The bomb is public policy for the powerful and private suffering for everyone else.

The Indian Question That Cannot Be Avoided

India must ask itself a plain question: what is the meaning of strategic autonomy if the first major rupture in West Asia still enters domestic life with this intensity?

The answer cannot be found in slogans. It lies in diversification of supply, storage resilience, public transparency, shipping alternatives, and the political courage to speak honestly about vulnerability before panic begins. A serious state does not wait for a shortage to explain dependence.

The citizen has a right to ask what exactly was gained from all the grand foreign-policy posturing if, in the end, the kitchen remains exposed, the market remains fragile, and the household remains one shipping disruption away from anxiety.

War Always Finds the Household

So let us stop repeating the comfortable falsehood that this war is far away.

It is not far away. It is in the Strait of Hormuz. It is in the refinery shutdown. It is in the airport disruption. It is in the WHO warning. It is in the Brent forecast. It is in the falling rupee. It is in the emergency order to protect LPG. It is in the household that has started thinking about fuel before the month is over. Reuters+6U.S. Energy Information Administration+6Reuters+6

War is never only where the missiles fall. It is wherever ordinary life is made to absorb the cost of decisions taken far above it.

And that is why the public must reject the old performance. A family kitchen is not collateral for geopolitical theatre. A citizen is not a sponge meant to absorb the shock of elite adventurism. A government does not become strong by asking people to be silent while they are made to pay.

What the world needs is not more choreography of power. It needs fewer wars without ends, fewer lies disguised as reassurance, and far more respect for the ordinary life that every war, sooner or later, reaches.

The War of Statements -- Who Really Looks Nervous?

See All News by Ravish Kumar
<<< Previously  Next >>>

If you listen carefully to what Iran is saying, and then listen to what Donald Trump is saying, something unusual begins to appear.

Not on the battlefield.
But in the words.

In wars, missiles are not the only weapons. Statements are also weapons. They reveal fear, confidence, confusion, or strategy.

And when you compare the two sides today, a strange contrast emerges.

Iran has spoken in one voice for eleven days.

Trump has spoken in eleven voices in one day.

---

Iran: One Line, One Tone

For the past eleven days, Iran’s statements have barely changed.

“We will not retreat.”
“We will fight as long as necessary.”

No ambiguity. No hesitation.

Iranian military leaders have openly said that the missiles they will now launch carry heavier payloads — bombs weighing nearly a ton. The Revolutionary Guard has declared there is no question of backing down.

And Iran’s strategy is becoming clearer with each passing day.

It is not merely targeting Israel.

It is targeting America’s strategic presence in the region.

Attacks on Gulf countries are not random. They are calculated. American military bases are located there. Iran understands that if you want to challenge Israel, you must challenge the power that stands behind it.

So the conflict expands.

Oil infrastructure is hit. Supply chains are disrupted. Refineries burn.

Reports suggest that a drone strike forced the shutdown of the Ruwais refinery of ADNOC in the UAE, one of the largest refineries in the world.

Another industrial complex in Abu Dhabi reportedly caught fire after a drone attack.

The message is clear.

Iran’s drones can reach anywhere.

And suddenly, those massive American bases in the Gulf — symbols of American power for decades — look strangely ineffective.

---

America’s Allies Are Hesitating

This war is revealing another uncomfortable truth.

America may have allies in the Gulf.

But allies do not always mean soldiers.

In November 2025, the United States and Saudi Arabia signed a major defense and economic agreement. Technology transfers, military cooperation, training programs, arms supply — the partnership was described as historic.

Trump himself said Saudi Arabia had become America’s largest military partner outside NATO.

But today, questions are being asked.

Even inside America.

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, long known for supporting attacks on Iran, recently asked an uncomfortable question.

Why should the United States have defense agreements with countries that refuse to stand beside it in war?

American soldiers are dying. Billions of dollars are being spent. Yet Saudi Arabia is largely issuing statements rather than entering the battlefield.

The U.S. embassy in Riyadh is reportedly being evacuated because of Iranian attacks.

The tone of Graham’s message sounded less like a threat and more like frustration.

Almost like America is pleading with its allies.

---

The Iranian Calculus

Iran, meanwhile, appears prepared for a long confrontation.

Its foreign minister once said something remarkable:

“We have prepared for this war for twenty years.”

In Iran’s system, military leadership positions have multiple successors ready in advance — a policy known as “four successors.”

When Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was assassinated, Iran immediately appointed a new leader.

There was no visible institutional collapse.

Crowds appeared on the streets declaring loyalty to the new leadership — even though the new supreme leader has not yet appeared publicly.

This is a country that expected war.

And prepared for continuity.

---

The Myth of Iran’s Weakness

Western media repeatedly suggested that Iran’s missile stockpile was running out.

On March 4, The Times of Israel reported that Iran would soon exhaust its ballistic missiles.

Two days later, Israel’s army chief said Israeli strikes had destroyed 80% of Iran’s air defenses and 60% of its missile launchers.

Hours after that statement, Iran launched another wave of missiles.

This raises an obvious question.

If Iran’s air force is crippled, its navy destroyed — as Trump claims — why has the war not ended?

Why is Iran still able to strike Israeli territory?

Why is it able to hit American radar systems in UAE and Jordan?

And why is the Pentagon now considering moving THAAD radar systems from South Korea to the Middle East?

Wars expose truths that propaganda cannot hide for long.

---

And Then There Is Trump

Now compare this with Donald Trump’s statements.

Within hours he speaks to CNN, CBS, NBC, Fox News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and others.

And each interview tells a different story.

To one channel he says:

“The war is almost over.”

To another he says:

“We have plans for everything.”

In another interview he says the United States is still far from deciding on ground operations.

Then he says Iran must surrender.

Then he says negotiations may happen.

Then he threatens attacks twenty times stronger.

Trump says Iran’s missile capability has been reduced by ten percent.

Then he says Iran’s navy has been completely destroyed.

Then he says America knows where Iran builds drones and will attack those factories.

In modern warfare, confusion can sometimes be a tactic.

But sometimes confusion is simply confusion.

Even journalists are asking him directly:

You say the war is over.
Your defense secretary says it has just begun.

Which one is true?

---

Markets, Politics, and the Exit Strategy

There may be another reason behind Trump’s statements.

Markets.

On March 10, when Trump said the war was “almost finished,” stock markets immediately stabilized.

Oil prices fell slightly, dipping below $100 per barrel.

But they still remain near $90 per barrel, which is hardly comforting.

There is also a growing concern inside Washington.

If the war continues for months, Trump’s political base may weaken.

Pentagon officials reportedly told Congress that in just seven days the United States has already suffered more than $6 billion in losses and eight soldiers killed.

For a war that was supposed to demonstrate strength, the costs are rising quickly.

Some insiders believe the administration may eventually declare victory and exit — claiming that American objectives were achieved.

Trump has done this before.

---

The Swamp of the Middle East

There is an old pattern in the Middle East.

Wars begin with confidence.

They end with exhaustion.

Israel may not possess the most flawless technology in the world, but it possesses something equally powerful — the ability to pull the United States into complex regional wars.

Once inside, exiting becomes difficult.

One step out, another step sinks deeper.

The Middle East has a way of turning wars into swamps.

And when powerful nations enter a swamp, they often believe they are walking on solid ground.

Until the ground begins to move.

---

In this war of missiles and statements, one side sounds unwavering.

The other sounds unsure of its own script.

And sometimes, in geopolitics, tone itself reveals the balance of power.