See All Articles

The Great Ayodhya Heist: Faith, Loot, and the Complicit Silence of the Powerful

The Ram Temple in Ayodhya was supposed to be the crowning glory of a cultural renaissance, a symbol of Hindu pride and unity. Instead, it has become the stage for one of the most brazen spiritual swindles in modern Indian history. What began as whispers of financial mismanagement has, in recent weeks, erupted into a full-blown scandal involving cash, gold, diamonds, silver, land frauds, and an audacious cover-up that reaches the highest echelons of power. This is not just a story about a few rogue officials skimming donations; it is a devastating indictment of a system where faith is monetised, and those who dare question the plunder are silenced or ignored.

The outrage is visceral. When Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal visited Ayodhya on June 25 to offer prayers, it triggered a cascade of revelations that had long been suppressed. Hours after his visit, a hurried FIR was lodged against a handful of low-level operatives — eight small-time players who are clearly scapegoats. But the real question, the one that haunts millions of devotees, is this: where did the hundreds of crores in cash, the tonnes of silver, the ornaments, the diamonds, and the sheer avalanche of donations actually go? And why is the government, which built its entire political identity around Lord Ram, doing everything it can to shield the masterminds?

The Shock That Shattered a Nation’s Faith

For decades, devout Hindus across India and the diaspora poured their life savings into the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. They sold land, jewellery, and household goods, believing they were contributing to a sacred cause. The trust built to oversee the temple’s construction was handed to a coterie of ideologues and bureaucrats handpicked by the ruling dispensation. And for years, that trust operated in absolute opacity — no audits, no receipts, no accountability.

Consider the case of the Sindhi Association, which donated 200 kilograms of silver on January 26, 2021. They never received a receipt, and they never pushed for one. Like countless others, they placed their trust in the divine. Now that reports of monstrous fraud surface, that trust has shattered. They are not alone. Everyday worshipers who once contributed an average of Rs 12–14 lakh daily to the temple’s donation boxes have been withdrawing their faith in the form of currency: daily collections have plummeted to less than Rs 1 lakh since the scandal broke. The message is unmistakable — if the keepers of the temple cannot respect the sanctity of offerings, the offerings will stop.

The Anatomy of a Donation Scam

Reportedly, the thefts were not limited to cash boxes. According to multiple testimonies and media investigations, Lord Ram’s jewelry — necklaces, crowns, and even the holy sandals — were pilfered. Silver, gold, diamonds, and precious gems donated by millions vanished without a trace. The sheer scale suggests a systematic, top-down operation. One does not simply walk out of a heavily guarded temple complex with truckloads of precious metals unless there is complicity at the highest level.

But the fraud extends far beyond the temple’s sanctum. The land acquisition process for the temple and its associated projects reveals a pattern of breathtaking corruption. Take the case of Harish Pathak, a local landowner. On March 18, 2021, he sold 1.25 hectares of land for Rs 2 crore to two individuals connected to the party that controls the trust. Within ten minutes — literally ten minutes — the same land was purchased by the temple trust for Rs 18 crore. A clean profit of Rs 16 crore was siphoned off in a single transaction. This is not an isolated incident. Similar land deals have been reported where properties were bought at absurdly inflated prices, with the difference flowing into private pockets. The trust acted as a money-laundering laundromat for party loyalists.

Construction: A Bonanza of Kickbacks

If the land scams were the appetizer, the main course was the temple construction itself. Whistleblowers and opposition leaders allege that every tender awarded for building the Ram Temple carried a hefty commission. What should have cost Rs 2 was billed at Rs 20; what could have been built for Rs 10 was contracted at exorbitant sums. The temple’s magnificence was built on a foundation of inflated contracts and backroom deals. The beneficiaries are not obscure contractors — they are individuals with deep political connections who have long enjoyed the patronage of the ruling establishment.

The Astonishing Cover-Up

When the scale of the loot began dribbling into the public domain, the reaction from those responsible was not to investigate but to destruct evidence. Eight months of CCTV footage from the temple complex — recordings that would have shown who entered, who carried what, and when — were mysteriously deleted. In any normal theft case, preserving CCTV data is the first step. Here, the disappearance of the footage is itself a confession. It demonstrates that the crime goes all the way to the top, and those at the top are desperate to ensure no trail leads back to them.

The hurriedly constituted Special Investigation Team (SIT) and the subsequent FIR are a farce. The accused are low-level functionaries — small fry who will be sacrificed to appease public anger. No big names, no trustees, no political heavyweights. The message is clear: the system will protect its own. When the Prime Minister’s Office itself reportedly sought financial records from Champat Rai, the powerful general secretary of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, Rai flatly refused. And the PMO backed off without a reminder. This is unprecedented. In a democracy, when a trust defies the Prime Minister and nothing happens, who is actually running the country? What does Champat Rai possess that makes even Modi helpless? The silence screams of a deep, mutual hostage-taking — a nexus of secrets that binds the most powerful figures in the land.

Political Complicity: The Modi-Yogi Paradox

The Bharatiya Janata Party, which rode to power on the Ram wave and has weaponised Hindu identity for three decades, now finds itself in an acute moral crisis. Despite the mountain of evidence and public rage, not a single senior leader of the party has condemned the donation theft. Not one word of criticism from the Prime Minister, the Home Minister, or the UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. The party that claims to be the custodian of Hindu honour has chosen to protect donation thieves over the sentiments of the very devotees who voted them into power.

Yogi Adityanath’s position is particularly damning. As the Chief Minister, he controls the state machinery that could order a real investigation. Instead, he is reportedly facing pressure from the same corrupt network that is now plotting to remove him. His silence is a betrayal of the saintly image he projects. The sages and sadhus who have managed Hanuman Garhi for centuries without a whisper of corruption stand in stark contrast. The Ram Temple should have been handed over to genuine religious leaders, not to politicians and bureaucrats who treat it as a personal fiefdom.

There is a deeper political message here. The scam reveals that for the BJP, Ram is not a deity but a vote-gathering mascot. When the party needed power, it shouted “Ram Lalla hum aayenge, mandir wahi banayenge.” Now that the temple is built, it has become a trough for the party’s cronies. If you can loot the abode of the god you claim to revere, what won’t you loot? As a wise surgeon from Bihar quipped after visiting Ayodhya, “Those who did not spare Ram, will they spare the nation?”

The Destination of Plundered Wealth

The most unsettling question remains unanswered: where did the hundreds of crores go? The cash, the gold, the diamonds did not end up in the pockets of eight small-time accused. They were merely instruments. The trail inexorably leads out of Ayodhya, into the labyrinths of political funding and black money. Investigative journalists have hinted at links to shell companies, offshore accounts, and election war chests. The donation scam is not just about personal greed; it is a mechanism for syphoning unaccounted wealth to sustain a political machine.

This is not merely a law-and-order problem; it is a wound on the collective Hindu psyche. Millions feel violated. The demand across the community is unambiguous: the real perpetrators, the “rakshasas” who orchestrated this heist, must be brought to justice and punished with the harshest possible sentence. But the administration, from the Prime Minister down, is acting as a shield. The SIT is not an investigation; it is a burial of truth.

What Does Justice Look Like?

The only way to restore faith is radical transparency and institutional cleansing. The current trust, packed with politicians and retired bureaucrats, must be dissolved. The temple’s management should be transferred to a body of authentic dharmacharyas, sadhus, and saintly figures — people whose lives are dedicated to spiritual service, not political patronage. Every land deal, tender, and donation since the trust’s inception must be independently audited by a Supreme Court-monitored panel. The missing CCTV footage must be forensically retrieved; if it cannot be, that itself must become grounds for a criminal conspiracy charge against the trustees.

Until then, the devotees who have been robbed both materially and spiritually will continue to demand: hang the thieves, and their political patrons, on the banks of the Sarayu. Lord Ram, after all, is known for upholding maryada. Those who have defiled his temple have forsaken all maryada. The faithful will not rest until justice is served.

Facts

• The Sindhi Association donated 200 kg of silver in January 2021 and never received a receipt; they now feel betrayed.
• Daily temple donations averaged Rs 12–14 lakh; after the scandal broke, they dropped below Rs 1 lakh.
• On March 18, 2021, Harish Pathak sold 1.25 hectares for Rs 2 crore to BJP-linked individuals; within 10 minutes, the trust bought the same land for Rs 18 crore — a Rs 16 crore scam.
• Multiple allegations of kickbacks in construction tenders inflated costs by multiples.
• CCTV footage for eight months was deleted, destroying crucial evidence.
• The PMO sought financial records from Champat Rai, who refused; no follow-up was made.
• An FIR was filed only against eight minor individuals, with no senior trustees or politicians named.
• Not a single senior BJP leader has publicly condemned the donation theft.

Criticisms

• The Modi government has actively shielded the corrupt trust by refusing to order a genuine high-level probe, eroding the very Hindu faith it claims to represent.
• The BJP has exposed its hypocrisy: it used Lord Ram to capture power but now turns a blind eye while his temple is looted by party insiders.
• Champat Rai’s brazen refusal to share records with the PMO, and the PMO’s meek acceptance, suggests that Modi is either complicit or powerless against the entrenched corruption in his own ideological ecosystem.
• Yogi Adityanath’s silence and administrative inaction amount to collusion; a saint-turned-politician who cannot protect the sanctity of a temple has failed his core duty.
• The media, especially pro-establishment outlets, have underplayed the scandal to protect the government’s image, betraying journalistic ethics.
• The entire Ram Janmabhoomi trust is a political arrangement, not a spiritual one; its members are unaccountable cronies of the ruling party, lacking any moral authority.
• The deletion of CCTV evidence and the fake SIT reveal a pattern of systemic obstruction reminiscent of authoritarian regimes, not a democracy rooted in rule of law.
• The BJP’s demand for harsh punishment for corruption in other parties rings hollow when it constructs an elaborate shield around its own temple looters.

See All Articles

The 27-Year-Old Who Earns Rs 40,000 and Still Can’t Save a Rupee: A Real-Life Money Makeover

I recently spoke to a young woman from Kolkata — let’s call her Kasturi — who is bearing the financial weight of a family of four at just 27. With a stable job teaching English, a small side income from private tuitions, and a pile of responsibilities, she should be managing comfortably. Yet, at the end of every month, she’s left with little to nothing in savings. Her story is not unique; it’s the quiet crisis of the Indian middle class, where inflation, past debts, and everyday small expenses quietly chip away at any hope of building wealth. But there’s a way out, and it doesn’t require a six-figure salary from day one or a revolutionary financial product. It needs a shift in mindset, simple systems, and a vision for growth. Let’s break down Kasturi’s situation and design a path that any young earner can follow.

Understanding the Financial Snapshot

Kasturi lives with her parents and younger sister, who is still studying animation. Her father’s private transport business failed after COVID-19, so the family now relies entirely on her income. She brings in Rs 34,000 from her regular teaching job and an additional Rs 6,000 from tuitions, totaling Rs 40,000 a month. That’s the only income for four people.

On the expense side, her fixed monthly costs are: - Rent: Rs 7,000 - Electricity: Rs 1,200–1,300 - Gas: Rs 988 - Groceries: Rs 7,000–8,000 - Petrol for her father’s bike (which he uses to drop her to school): Rs 1,000 - Mobile and internet recharge: Rs 750 - Miscellaneous (clothing, personal care, occasional treats): Rs 4,000–5,000 That totals roughly Rs 25,000.

Then come the loans. Her father had taken a loan of Rs 2,15,496 to clear earlier business dues. The monthly EMI is about Rs 7,400, and only 10 installments remain. So, with the EMI, total monthly outgo stands at approximately Rs 32,400, leaving a theoretical surplus of Rs 7,600.

The Missing Money: Where Does It Go?

If there’s a surplus of Rs 7,600 each month, why does Kasturi say “no savings are happening”? Because money has a habit of disappearing through a thousand tiny cracks. Zomato orders, Swiggy deliveries, a quick Blinkit purchase, a day out with friends, a new OTT subscription, a cafe visit — each bite is small, but by month’s end, the bank account is nearly empty. Kasturi admitted that she often doesn’t even know how the money vanishes. At the time she spoke to me, she had only about Rs 20,000 in her bank account, and that was before several big expenses (like rent and electricity) had been paid. She owns no gold, no land, no house, and no investments.

This is dangerous not because Kasturi is lazy or bad with money, but because most of us grew up with a flawed financial script: “Earn, spend on what’s necessary, and if anything is left, save it.” That script works against you. It treats saving as an afterthought, and before you know it, the “leftover” never materializes. So the very first fix is to flip the equation.

Fix #1: Pay Yourself First

In personal finance, there’s an age-old principle that many ignore: Pay yourself first. The idea was popularised by classics like George S. Clason’s “The Richest Man in Babylon” and forms the bedrock of modern saving habits. Instead of spending first and trying to save whatever remains, you reverse the order. Take a portion of your income off the top and treat it as a non-negotiable expense — you are paying your future self before anyone else.

For Kasturi, I recommended setting aside Rs 6,000 every month right after her salary hits the bank. Her salary arrives on the first of each month, so the very next step should be an automatic transfer of Rs 6,000 into a separate investment vehicle. This is not for emergencies, not for the Diwali shopping, not for a vacation. It is for building long-term wealth. The remaining Rs 34,000 then becomes her “new” monthly income, from which all household expenses and the EMI must be managed. If she follows this, after the fixed expenses and EMI, she’ll be left with about Rs 2,600 to cover those small-amount leakages. With that capped limit, the impulse to order in or go out will automatically be checked — because the bank account won’t have unlimited cushion.

Fix #2: Automate Your Savings and Invest Simply

Automation is your biggest ally. The Rs 6,000 should not be manually moved each month, because willpower fades and “this month is a little tight” becomes a recurring excuse. Set up a Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) in a broad-market index fund that automatically debits the amount on the 1st or 2nd of every month. Why an index fund? Because for someone starting out with no investing experience, picking individual stocks is risky, time-consuming, and often emotional. A Nifty 50 or Sensex index fund gives you diversified exposure to the top companies of India with the lowest cost and volatility relative to individual stocks. As Kenneth Fisher famously said, “Time in the market beats timing the market,” and a simple index SIP is the most reliable way to build wealth over decades.

Consider this: If Kasturi invests Rs 6,000 per month at an average annual return of 12% (a reasonable long-term expectation for equity index funds in India), in 10 years she would have approximately Rs 13.9 lakh. In 20 years, over Rs 55 lakh. That’s the power of compounding — but it only works if the money is invested every single month without fail, and left untouched. Once the loan EMI ends in 10 months, that Rs 7,400 can be partly redirected to increase the SIP amount, build an emergency fund, and fund health insurance. But for now, even Rs 6,000 a month is a strong beginning.

The Income Ceiling Myth: Why Earning More Matters

Cutting expenses has a hard floor — you cannot squeeze rent, groceries, or electricity beyond a point without affecting the quality of life. Kasturi cannot ask her father to stop using the bike, or cut out groceries because that feeds the family. So while discipline is crucial, financial freedom will not come only from pinching pennies. It will come from expanding the top line: income.

Kasturi’s decision to start online tuitions alongside her regular job is brilliant, but she must think bigger. Right now, her teaching ability is limited to a local audience in Kolkata. But English is a global skill. With the right platform and branding, she can reach students across India, or even the world. If she can create a system where she teaches, say, 20 students online at Rs 5,000 per head per month, that’s Rs 1,00,000 extra. Suddenly, her monthly income jumps from Rs 40,000 to over Rs 1,40,000. Even if she scales to Rs 1,00,000 by June 2027 — a realistic target — she’ll have a surplus of over Rs 50,000 to invest, to insure her family, and to finally breathe.

The host I was listening to highlighted an important shift: Stop seeing yourself as a local tutor. Build a personal brand, maybe record a course once and sell it repeatedly, or tie up with an ed-tech platform that can give you access to a large student base without you having to do heavy marketing. The online education market in India is projected to reach $5 billion by 2025 (KPMG India & Google, 2021), and English communication skills are always in demand. There’s a real opportunity here.

Insurance and Emergency Fund: The Safety Net

Before aiming for big wealth, one must build a safety net. Kasturi mentioned she has no health insurance, and a single medical emergency could wipe out her entire fragile structure. Many young earners make the mistake of skipping insurance because they think it’s an unnecessary expense. But a family floater health policy with a minimum sum insured of Rs 5 lakh is an absolute necessity. For a 27-year-old with parents, premiums could be around Rs 1,000–1,500 per month as a rough estimate. Right now, with the EMI still running, it’s tight — but she can start by allocating a small amount, say Rs 1,000, towards a basic health plan. Once the EMI is gone in 10 months, she can upgrade the coverage and also begin building a dedicated emergency fund equivalent to 3-6 months of expenses (around Rs 1.5 lakh to Rs 2 lakh). That emergency fund should be parked in a high-yield savings account or a very liquid debt fund — not in stocks.

Additionally, term life insurance is not urgent for her because she doesn’t have dependents who would be financially devastated if something happened to her (her parents are not solely dependent on her in that way, and her sister may start earning soon). But a small term plan could be considered once income grows significantly.

Bringing It All Together

Kasturi’s path to financial stability is not about a magic investment tip. It’s a four-step structure that any young earner can adapt:

Conclusion: Key Takeaways in Bullet Points

• Pay yourself first by automating a fixed savings amount (Rs 6,000 in her case) before any expenses. Treat it as a non-negotiable bill.
• Invest that savings into a low-cost index fund through a monthly SIP. Avoid picking individual stocks until you have significant knowledge and surplus.
• Plug discretionary spending leaks by setting a hard budget after savings and fixed costs. Use cash or a separate bank account to limit mindless spending on food delivery and entertainment.
• Focus aggressively on increasing your income. For Kasturi, that means expanding her English teaching beyond Kolkata — explore online course creation, build a personal brand, and scale to reach a global audience. The goal is to take monthly earnings from Rs 40,000 to Rs 1,00,000 and beyond within two years.
• Once the loan EMI ends in 10 months, immediately redirect that freed-up money into building an emergency fund and purchasing a comprehensive family health insurance policy.
• Remember that wealth is built not by how much you earn at the beginning, but by the habits you form and the consistent, small steps you take. A 27-year-old with no assets today can easily be sitting on a multi-lakh corpus by 35 if she starts now and stays consistent.

Kasturi’s story is a mirror for millions of working Indians. The script isn't broken — it just needs to be rewritten. And the first chapter starts with Rs 6,000 a month.

References and Further Reading

• Clason, George S. “The Richest Man in Babylon” — the timeless principle of paying yourself first.
• KPMG India and Google Report (2021) — “Online Education in India: 2021” highlighting market growth.
• SEBI Investor Education materials on index funds and SIPs — for understanding low-cost equity investing.
• Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) guidelines on family health insurance.

See All Articles

The Juggler’s Paradox: Why Safety Comes from Taking Risks

When I told my father I was skipping university to become a professional juggler, his answer came fast and heavy: “Boy, it’s all about safety.” He wasn’t entirely wrong. Years later, after circus school, after winning prizes in Paris, after building a career out of throwing things in the air and catching them — I started to realize that safety was indeed at the heart of everything. But not in the way my father meant. Safety is not a fortress you build and then hide inside. It is something you create over and over again by stepping into the unknown. Today’s risk is tomorrow’s safety.

You might not juggle flaming torches, but you juggle all day long. In one hand, your private life: a demanding partner, strong-willed children, a weird neighbor, chat groups that never sleep. In the other hand, your work life: confusing emails, urgent deadlines, colleagues who love to talk. And above it all, you juggle limited time, limited energy, limited money — while new balls keep flying at you. Some days everything flows, structured and easy, the balls floating in perfect arcs. Other days, things spin fast, chaotic, up and down and back and forth at the same time. Welcome to the juggler’s world. You live in a circus too.

The Circus of Business and the Illusion of Safety

Right after circus school, I was lucky. I got a great job, was invited to the International Circus Festival in Paris, won prizes, came back as the newcomer. My calendar filled up. I earned good money and spent it with both hands — because what’s the point of being a juggler if you can’t juggle credit cards too? I leaned back and thought, “What can happen to me?” Then the Iron Curtain fell, and three incredibly trained artists from circus schools in Moscow, Kyiv, and St. Petersburg hit the European market. They didn’t start at sixteen. They started at age six. The nerds among them juggled before they could walk, while balancing on the umbilical cord. Suddenly Victor got the job with his seven balls, Natalia with her hula hoop act — and her costume was much less than mine. I had to ask myself: How do I get my customers back? What can I do?

I expanded my portfolio. I created a second juggling act. You don’t pull that out of your sleeve; it takes two or three years of rehearsal, at least two hours a day. But it worked. I had two acts, sold them for the price of one and a half. Orders came in, the pipeline filled. I leaned back again and thought, “Andy, everything is all right.” It was — for a while. Then came the next market shift. Cirque du Soleil made circus trendy again. Young people everywhere wanted to become circus artists. In the mid‑2000s, competition grew brutally, and suddenly it was all about price. By then I had a family. My wife looked at me and said, “Andy, I basically like you, but what about an ad: ‘Successful juggler mows your lawn’?” I had to face facts. Could I afford to keep working on stage? If I wanted to, what were my options? Where was the niche?

I rehearsed like a lunatic, two years of sore muscles. Sometimes I woke up already juggling. But I managed to stretch my stage time to 45 minutes, and that opened the door to American cruise ships. They called it “flying entertainer”: fly in, do your show, fly to the next vessel, then home. In those hectic days, something became clear — something that gets truer every year. The feeling of safety is always an illusion. When we think we are safe because we finished our studies, landed a great job, got married, or became market leader with happy customers and no complaints — we lean back. We slow down our development. We don’t notice that everything around us keeps moving. The next thing we see is the abyss opening behind us. Safety is not carved in stone. But we need safety. So where does new safety come from?

The Safety Circle

Think of your life as a circle. Inside the circle is everything familiar: your daily routines, your network, your job, your family, the quirky mother‑in‑law, the weird neighbor. It’s not always comfortable, but you’ve arranged it. You know how to handle it. This is your horizon of experience, your safety zone. Outside the circle is everything unknown: risky, dangerous, unfamiliar. You’re better off staying inside. But here’s the problem. On the outside, change is constantly chipping away at your circle. Market shifts happen. Competition arrives — like a fifteen‑year‑old juggler with twenty years’ experience. Innovation and artificial intelligence are out there, with agents that can research and decide faster than you, 24/7. Digital transformation creeps in: you can’t even buy a cup of coffee without a credit card and a smartphone anymore. New technologies sneak up. The next generation arrives with their own bewildering language. All of this gnaws at your safety area, making it smaller and tighter.

If you stand inside that shrinking circle, you feel the squeeze. There’s a deep, biological urge to expand your safety back to a normal level. You have two ways to go:

Path A: Resisting Change

You push against everything that scratches your safety. You reject the new software because the old one works and Excel sheets are fine. You refuse training because “at my age, with my experience, it’s weird.” You shun new devices because they complicate things. You are against, against, against everything. Many people try this. They want to go back to the good old times. But as far as I know, nobody has managed to turn back the wheel of time. And honestly, do we really want a world without smartphones, without heated car seats, without dishwashers? (Okay, we can discuss the spiral cutter for vegetable noodles. No, actually, we can’t.)

Path B: Stepping into the Unknown

The other direction is toward the unknown — the very thing that feels dangerous. The only way to expand your safety is to get to know the unknown. Every time you learn something new, it stops being new. Every time you solve a problem, it’s no longer a problem. Every time you step out of your safety zone, the zone grows. This is the paradox: Today’s risk becomes tomorrow’s safety. The safer you want to feel, the earlier you have to venture out and learn something new — even if it means risking something. No risk, no safety.

Risk Becomes Normal

Think about the CD. When it arrived in the 1980s, people clutching their vinyl records stood inside their safety circle and grumbled, “I have my records.” Within years, CDs were the standard. Now they are old school — and some people are still clinging to their records. Video conferencing emerged around 2005, something only for the IT department. Now it’s as normal as a phone call. What will be standard in five years? Holograms? Will I have to clean my entire office? On the other side of the circle, we have to let go of old excellence. We have to release paper forms, the wish to plan everything ahead. There is nothing worse than being an expert in something that no longer matters — like selling CDs.

Safety is the result of past risks. Watch a three‑year‑old pick up a large sharp knife to cut an apple. Adults panic: “Maybe it’s a bit early.” But if we stop them every time, they grow up breaking into a sweat when they have to slice an apple at forty. Early aviators jumped off rooftops with homemade wings while neighbors talked and wives probably asked them to get real jobs. Only because they risked everything can we now fly on holiday over the clouds, watching movies, completely relaxed. Our standard, our normality, is the result of past risk‑takers.

The Two Paths Compared

The choice between resisting and embracing risk isn’t abstract. It shapes careers, companies, and lives. Let’s put it side by side.

Aspect	Path A: Resisting Change	Path B: Embracing Risk
Attitude toward the new	Fear, rejection, “against”	Curiosity, openness, “let’s try”
Behavior	Defend the old, avoid training, hope the problem solves itself	Seek learning, take small steps into discomfort, ask “what’s next?”
View of mistakes	Something to avoid at all costs	Essential for progress (no mistakes, no growth)
Reaction to competition	Complain, feel threatened, double down on the past	Adapt, build new skills, find a niche
Long‑term outcome	Safety zone shrinks, skills become obsolete, crash inevitable	Safety zone expands, new opportunities emerge, resilience grows
Emotional state	Anxiety masked as stubbornness, often surprise when crisis hits	Initial discomfort, then confidence through competence

Henry Ford once said, “There are more people who surrender than those who fail.” Surrender doesn’t mean giving up outright. It means doing business as usual, hoping the problem will solve itself, staring into the headlights like a deer and then being shocked when it crashes. Surrender is telling yourself, “This is not my cup of tea,” or “In five years I’ll be retired anyway.”

The Juggler’s Approach: Permission to Fail

If I teach you to juggle but hand you raw eggs instead of balls, what would you learn — besides how to wipe the floor? You’d see instantly: no mistakes, no progress. Unless you love scrambled eggs, you need permission to drop things. If you want to feel safe somewhere new, you have to give yourself permission to try and to fail. And the earlier you grant that permission, the faster you grow. Safety needs development.

We all know we need development. But when we think about it, we hesitate. Is it the right moment? Do I have the right tools? Is the weather fine enough? Do I have the right people around me? While we’re thinking, we do nothing. But if you decide to take the first step, you will learn something. That learning will guide the next step. Step by step, you get a little smarter, a little more skilled. If you keep your head involved, suddenly things become possible that you hadn’t imagined before.

That’s when colleagues and friends look over your shoulder and ask, “How do you get a grip on all this crazy stuff?” And you answer, “It was just one step after another.” I made my way from juggler to speaker — not a straight line, but I love it. My wife doesn’t ask me to get a real job anymore. I feel safe for the next three months, which is about as much safety as anyone can truly bank on.

Key Takeaways

• - Safety is not a permanent state; it’s an illusion. The moment you feel perfectly safe, you are already at risk of being left behind.
• - The world outside your comfort zone — new technology, competition, changing markets — constantly chips away at your safety. You can’t stop it.
• - You have two options: resist and shrink, or venture out and grow. Resisting only delays the crash.
• - Real safety comes from encountering the unknown, learning from it, and turning it into the familiar. Today’s risk is tomorrow’s safety. No risk, no safety.
• - Give yourself permission to try and fail. Mistakes are not a sign of incompetence; they are proof that you are expanding your safety circle.
• - Don’t wait for the perfect moment. Take one small step. Learn. Apply. Repeat. That’s how you go from overwhelmed to in control.

Your Next Step

What would you like to learn? Where would you like to feel safer? Theory alone changes nothing. To learn something, you have to step into the risk. Think of a three‑ball juggle. You can read about it, watch videos, listen to experts — but until you actually throw the balls and drop them a hundred times, you will never juggle. The same holds for your career, your business, your life.

So I ask you: Which risk are you willing to take to create your future? The answer to that question, acted on today, will build the safety you’ll feel tomorrow.

See All Articles

The Temple Heist and the Cracking of a Forced Consensus: How Opposition Is Rising From Within the Religious Sphere

Something remarkable is unfolding in the domain of religion. An opposition is being born. Not in parliament. Not on the streets. But inside the very sacred space that was carefully manufactured into an unchallenged monolith. And if this opposition grows—and there are signs it will—the BJP knows its support base could suffer a deep wound.

The same religion whose name was weaponized to annihilate the political opposition—where every question raised by the opposition was branded anti-Hindu, anti-Ram—that same religion is now nursing an opposition within itself. The theft at the Ram Mandir has done something no political party could achieve. It has cracked open a space for dissent inside the fortress of faith.

The Two Destructive Centers of Religious Dissent

The opposition forming within the religious sphere has two destructive centers. The first comprises prominent figures connected to religious institutions who are openly opposing the dominance of a single organization in the temple administration and Ayodhya's expanded construction. Sometimes they name names through hints and gestures. Sometimes—increasingly now—they directly name the RSS and the VHP. The manner in which these organizations have been challenged from religious platforms in Ayodhya after the temple theft, the questions raised about control—this demands our attention.

Consider what has happened since 2014. The long era of the Modi government manufactured a broad consensus in the religious sphere. A consensus enforced through power and authority, through which it was simply assumed that within the domain of religion, there existed no second opinion about Modi, about the BJP, about the RSS. But now, a second opinion is being heard. And a third.

Organizations connected to Hindu religion, religious leaders—everyone started chanting "Modi, Modi" after 2014. They still do. They will continue to. But the voice of protest arising from the temple theft does not sound like it belongs to this era. The BJP knows its political foundation is religious. It is because of religion that people overlook the government's countless failures and cast their votes. If opposition intensifies within the religious sphere itself—if the religious supporter becomes angry because of a theft at the temple—a challenge could emerge.

"Do Not Curse the House" — And Who Exactly Is the House?

Film actor Anupam Kher's statement deserves attention. He said that when a theft occurs in your house, you curse the thief, not the house. Hindus, he said, should understand this. Those who donated here did not bribe God. Donation happens without expectation. Do not curse the house.

And what is this house? The house is the RSS, the VHP, and the BJP. And who are the heads of this household? Prime Minister Narendra Modi. RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat. The temple incident is being framed as a family matter. But the public is reading it differently—are the accused, who are important people, being protected in the name of the family?

Anupam Kher is not alone. From the first day, the line was drawn—who are these others to level accusations? The truth is this: had Akhilesh Yadav not dared to make the allegation, had he not taken this risk, the matter of the temple theft would have been quietly pushed aside. Managed. No one would have known.

News about the theft spread like fire after Akhilesh's statement. The BJP's religious supporter became alert. Ears perked up. People started asking whether morality was being observed in this matter. Was accountability being demanded? Was action taken immediately, or delayed by months, by weeks?

The Desperation in "It's a Family Matter"

The BJP, on the other hand, was reading the meaning of this anger. That is why it repeatedly emphasized: this is a family matter. An internal matter. A theft occurred. The family members will manage it among themselves. They will catch the thieves. Wait fifteen more days. Be patient. Don't worry. But—do not, under any circumstances, fall into the trap of those who wish to defame Ayodhya, who wish to insult the Ram Janmabhoomi temple.

The BJP's restlessness is visible in these statements. It knows that all its explanations about the temple theft and the Trust's land purchases are not generating much trust. Countless questions exist in the minds of its own supporters. Some have started speaking openly. Some remain silent out of fear. But even those who are silent have questions in their hearts.

The BJP must be thinking: if, because of religion, its supporter becomes vocal, becomes enraged, or silently angry and drifts away to the margins—then there will be trouble. And if those religious organizations that were silenced before the colossal influence of the RSS start speaking, and if other religious organizations follow their lead—then the consensus imposed upon the religious sphere will shatter.

The Consensus Has Already Cracked

The consensus has cracked. And from that crack, the opposition is visible, emerging from within religion itself.

Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati of Jyotir Math is demanding the dissolution of the temple Trust. He is issuing warnings continuously. Repeatedly asking: why are RSS people sitting in the Trust? What is their work? They should be removed.

Mahant Dinendra Das, the head of the Nirmohi Akhara—which was a party in the Ram Janmabhoomi case—is saying that if a theft occurred in Ram Lalla's house, it means Ravan has reached there. He says the senior officials of the temple Trust gave him no responsibility because, perhaps, he does not belong to their ideology. Understand this: Mahant Dinendra Das says that including him in the temple Trust must have been a compulsion for these people, because the judgment clearly stated that the Nirmohi Akhara should be given effective representation.

Mahant Dharamdas of Hanuman Garhi, also a party in the Ram Mandir case, is opposing the Trust. He demands management through the Mahanti system. Mahant Dharamdas has been leveling allegations of theft and looting against the Trust since the two-thousand-teens. He had submitted a written complaint at the police station that temple money was being invested in business.

But then, there was no uproar over his words. Because by then, the BJP, the RSS, and the Modi government had established complete control over the religious sphere. No voice of disagreement could be heard from anywhere. And if a voice emerged, it received no support.

The Silencing Machine: 2014 to 2024

After 2014, such voices stopped being heard. In 2019, no one could dare to speak. In 2024, the temple's inauguration silenced everyone. Religious institutions are considered independent of any political party. But in the atmosphere of 2024, everyone started appearing as BJP workers. Everyone started repeating the BJP's line.

The whip with which the BJP was driving all religious organizations—after the temple theft, many saints have come forward and grabbed that whip. Santosh Dubey is sitting in Ayodhya, single-handedly opening a front. Giving interviews every day. Speaking of threats to his life. His interviews are being shown. Santosh Dubey is speaking about theft and embezzlement, against the control of the RSS and BJP.

Had this same Santosh Dubey spoken in 2019, no Godhi channel would have shown him. But today, his profile is being printed. Through Anil Mishra's case, people are speaking openly against the control of the RSS and BJP.

Therefore, the opposition forming in the religious sphere—the voices of protest breaking out—should be heard. It is possible that after some time, these voices will fall silent. But one possibility is visible: the control of the RSS over religious institutions rests only on the strength of political power. Whenever that power appears weakened, such voices will be heard again.

This is why the BJP is aggressively targeting the opposition parties that exposed the temple theft. But on the other hand, when the people and saints of Ayodhya target the control of the RSS and BJP, the party falls silent. It cannot call them anti-Ram or anti-religion.

Can the BJP call Mahant Dharamdas anti-religion, anti-Ram? During the Ram Mandir movement, he accused the VHP of embezzling donations. That matter was closed. Suppressed. Now statements about that old matter are being printed again. Being shown again. It seems as if many people were waiting for this very day—for something to happen so they could vent their anger. So they could speak about the control of the RSS and VHP.

Even the Worship Is Being Questioned

A report by Nitin Mishra of Amar Ujala shows saints raising before the Trust the lack of adherence to tradition. They say the worship is not being conducted according to the Ramanandi tradition. Several standards of the Ramanandi tradition are not being followed. The Trust's treasurer, Govind Dev Giri, has said that improvements in the worship system and the arrangements for devotees will be visible in the next two to three months.

Consider this: questions are being raised even about how the worship is being conducted. Traditions are not being followed. These complaints are rising. And now they are being heard. These voices should be seen as a form of protest rising from within the religious sphere.

Was all this possible before the temple theft? Questions are being raised even about the worship. Is this a small question? There are thousands of sadhus and saints in Ayodhya, not just two or four. Only two or four are shown in the media. The day the media's camera turns toward all these sadhus and saints, you will begin to hear the voice of protest. With greater articulation.

This anger within the religious sphere was suppressed. It was crushed. It remained suppressed even when Ayodhya politically ousted the BJP.

Ayodhya's Silent Rebellion

It was the effect of this very dissent and opposition that the people of Ayodhya, in 2024, without making a noise, without raising slogans, defeated the BJP on the Ayodhya Lok Sabha seat. The year the temple was inaugurated, the BJP lost the Ayodhya seat. Samajwadi Party's Awadhesh Prasad became the hero. But Ayodhya fell silent after that. Ayodhya was watching. Watching to see if the BJP would understand the meaning of this. And whether it would withdraw the control of one organization's ideology over the temple and the city.

Doing so was not possible for the BJP then. Nor is it possible now. The neglect of local people and local traditions in Ayodhya's expansion also compelled the people of Ayodhya to become a political opposition. But now the opposition is emerging with the support of the religious sphere and religious symbols.

This is not the opposition connected to opposition parties. This is the opposition that was standing on the BJP's side.

The BJP thought the protest was political. So it engaged in trying to manage it. After Dinesh Prasad became the MP, the allegations of rigging in the Milkipur by-election were not even acknowledged. The BJP's victory was declared a great victory. Even then, the process of opposition forming in Ayodhya did not end. That same opposition is visible to you now in the religious sphere after the temple theft. Water is being poured repeatedly on that fire of opposition being formed. But the fire is not being extinguished.

Dattatreya Hosabole's Revealing Appeal

A month after the temple theft, the RSS felt it should speak. Dattatreya Hosabole's statement arrived. And observe the appeal made in that statement: "Defeat the conspiracies of anti-Hindu, anti-national forces to defame Hindu religion and society." An appeal is being made to the entire Hindu society. That means that within the religious sphere, within the religious support base, the voices of rebellion and opposition are troubling the BJP.

The BJP is afraid that its political foundation—which is, in fact, a religious foundation—could crack. Who are these "opponents of Hindu religion"? Will you call those who exposed the temple theft opponents? How can they be opponents of Hindu religion?

It was the effect of this very opposition and dissent that in the case of the theft at the Ram Mandir—which the BJP was trying to make a family matter, appearing indifferent—as soon as the news of theft at the Badrinath temple arrived, the party realized the matter could slip out of hand. Immediately, an FIR was filed. The Chief Minister started issuing statements. An inquiry committee was formed.

But recall: in 2023, senior priest and vice-president of the Char Dham Teerth Purohit Samaj, Santosh Trivedi, alleged that a scam of one hundred twenty-five crore rupees had occurred in the maintenance of the Kedarnath temple. The sanctum sanctorum's wall was plated with copper instead of gold. The administration's inquiry gave a clean chit to the temple administration. It was said that the gold wall exists. At that time, the Badrinath-Kedarnath Temple Committee denied these allegations and said there was a conspiracy to damage the temple's reputation.

But this time, on social media, it started circulating that the offering money was being spent on politicians. This information was not provided by the Chief Minister. Not by any leader connected to the BJP. Not by any religious leader connected to the RSS. This information came out through an RTI. Immediately, the Badrinath-Kedarnath Temple Committee swung into action. An inquiry committee was formed. An FIR was lodged. And the accused personal assistant, Pramod Nautiyal, was even suspended.

Whereas in the Ram Mandir theft case, it took eighteen days for an FIR to be filed. It took a month for Champat Rai and Anil Mishra to resign from the Trust.

The Meaning of the Delay

The meaning is clear. Someone was sensing. Someone was feeling that if the anger of the people in the religious sphere grew, the support base the BJP possesses on the foundation of religion could crack.

The theft at the Ram Mandir is being called a great sin. By saints. By the public. The offerings made at the temple of Lord Ram—what would you call their theft? And this great sin has been committed by the BJP and RSS together.

The saint's words are scathing: the temple of Lord Ram was taken under control, but the work done was "Ram on the lips, dagger under the armpit." Theft was committed in the name of Lord Ram. And the reality is that only forty days of theft have been caught. In forty days, the temple was looted seventy times. They have left even Ghazni behind. And these self-proclaimed, so-called protectors of Hindutva—the RSS and BJP—neither cared nor were troubled.

But this time, opposition has been born within religion.

The Ghosts That Are Returning

The story of Praveen Togadia, expelled from the Vishwa Hindu Parishad organization, is surfacing again. How he was removed. What happened to him. Suddenly, Praveen Togadia's voice is becoming relevant.

In Guwahati, Togadia said that a theft has occurred at the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya—the Trust and the police have admitted it. For millions of Hindus, this is an assault, a sorrow, and an outrage. We had not imagined even in our dreams that a dacoity would take place at the center of Hindu faith. We are stunned. His demand: not a single person should be spared. A fast-track court case should be run, and a sentence of life imprisonment or death by hanging should be given.

And another event has occurred. The old history of Nripendra Mishra, connected to the temple construction committee, is being dug up. Prakash Sharma, an RSS-BJP member and spokesperson for Champat Rai, wrote on Facebook that Nripendra Mishra served innocent Ram devotees with gun bullets during the Janmabhoomi movement. Santosh Dubey is also giving statements—that the bullets on Karsevaks were ordered by Nripendra Mishra. Only the late Mulayam Singh Yadav was defamed for this.

Now think: why is Nripendra Mishra being targeted? Through him, whose control is being targeted? You will arrive at the control of the RSS, VHP, and BJP.

Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, in his speeches, talks about the Samajwadi Party—that in their government, bullets were fired at Karsevaks. Why is Yogi Adityanath reviving this memory? Is it so that Nripendra Mishra's history is dug up? So that the Samajwadi Party is forced into a debate, making Nripendra Mishra an issue?

Nripendra Mishra himself has stated that the bullets were not fired on the orders of Mulayam Singh Yadav. The district administration fired them. In administrative procedure, the Chief Minister gives directions. Orders are given by the Chief Secretary, the Principal Secretary. Nripendra Mishra was the Principal Secretary in Mulayam Singh Yadav's government.

Yogi Adityanath should ask Prime Minister Narendra Modi why the Modi government awarded the Padma Vibhushan to that same Mulayam Singh Yadav—whose name he takes in his gatherings, the person he says ordered bullets fired at Karsevaks. Why was he honored? Can the Modi government honor a person it believes ordered bullets fired at Karsevaks connected to the Ram Mandir? Nripendra Mishra was also given the Padma Vibhushan by the Modi government.

Now the RSS, BJP, and VHP—all three—should clarify what Nripendra Mishra's role was in the matter of firing bullets at Karsevaks.

"House" Whose Walls Are Crumbling

The BJP says this is a family matter—ghar ki baat. People know whose family matter this is. It is the family matter of the RSS, VHP, and BJP. But people want to see whether you can take action against the big people of your own house.

People are asking: it is a family matter. The house was in your hands. Those in whose hands it was—will their accountability be demanded? It took a month just to resign. Anil Mishra and Champat Rai were removed. No FIR has been filed till now. The needle of suspicion also points toward Gopal Rao. When Champat Rai breaks his silence, against whom will he speak? What will he say? Against Gopal Rao—or against those people who stopped him from filing an FIR? Who were those people? Will Champat Rai ever be able to say all this?

This is why the BJP is deeply troubled by the formation—by the very possibility of the formation—of opposition within the religious sphere.

The Three Centers of Emerging Opposition in Religion

The opposition forming in the religious sphere has three centers:

• Within religious institutions
• Within the BJP's religious support base
• Within the narrative of Hindu unity

After Prime Minister Narendra Modi's electoral successes, the narrative of Hindu religious unity was exaggerated and amplified. It was shown that the RSS and Prime Minister Modi had transformed caste-divided politics into Hindu unity. An atmosphere was created in the name of this unity. Questions related to caste were dismissed.

These people never tried to understand what kind of religious issues were emerging within that religion, within that unity. Thousands of religious institutions may have one purpose, but everyone's religious and economic influence is different. There is competition among them. There are clashes of interests. Disputes occur. Murders happen.

The politics of religion cannot appear one-sided and monolithic. The voices of dissent within it were suppressed. Crushed. Those same voices are now rising again.

This is not only about Ayodhya. In Mathura too, a section of the saint community is opposing the beautification plans. But no one is listening. In Banaras too, there is resentment. In 2024, like Ayodhya, resentment was visible there too. But there too, silence dominates. The people there are unable to voice their concerns. The people of Dal Mandi are troubled. But the prominent people of the city, out of fear, are not standing with them. The heads of religious institutions can no longer voice the concerns of the public.

When Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati of Jyotir Peeth started speaking continuously against the government, a case was fraudulently imposed on him. The same way the political opposition was frightened with cases and litigation, voices from the religious sphere were also silenced. Because of this fear, many saints and mahants fell silent. But the restlessness within many is now growing.

Why Did No One Speak for So Many Years?

In the religious sphere, apart from the public that practices religion, there are institutions connected to its management. Akharas. Ashrams. Heads of maths. Several saints have said that theft had been ongoing at the Ram Mandir for years. Then why, for years, could no one say anything? How did the heads of religious institutions keep sitting with so many questions? Were they afraid of the E.D.? Did they see the threat of their ashram's control being snatched away?

After the temple theft, everyone has found an opportunity to speak. Those who appeared hesitant on the side of the ruling establishment are now appearing vocal on the side of the opposition.

We were shown that the opposition had been eliminated from politics. But the opposition had also been eliminated from within the religious sphere. Now opposition is forming in the domain of religion. The BJP is becoming restless.

Do not connect these matters to elections. The election results have no relation to these matters. Elections are now won through other means. But the BJP's supporters stay silent about that victory because of this very religious unity. If opposition begins forming in the religious sphere, if restlessness increases—the questions of all of them could also become connected to electoral victory.

If theft at the temple is a great sin, then stealing votes and snatching away the right to vote is no act of virtue either.

---

Criticisms

• A forced consensus was manufactured in the religious sphere after 2014, silencing all dissenting voices through power and authority.
• Religious institutions were effectively converted into extensions of a political party's machinery.
• The temple theft was attempted to be managed and suppressed as a "family matter" rather than treated as a criminal act demanding immediate accountability.
• Eighteen days were taken to file an FIR in the Ram Mandir theft case, while an FIR in the Badrinath case was filed almost instantly—revealing selective urgency.
• The RSS and its affiliated organizations are accused of exercising total control over the temple Trust, sidelining legitimate stakeholders like the Nirmohi Akhara.
• A Padma Vibhushan was awarded by the government to an individual whose own party's narrative holds responsible for bullets fired at Karsevaks—a contradiction never explained.
• Religious leaders who dared to question the administration were threatened with fabricated legal cases, mirroring the treatment of political opposition.
• The narrative of "Hindu unity" was used to bury legitimate questions of caste, tradition, and local rights under a monolithic political project.
• No FIR has been filed against senior Trust officials even a month after resignations, suggesting protection rather than accountability.
• Offerings and donations at major temples were allegedly diverted, with oversight mechanisms either absent or controlled by the same organizations benefiting from the opacity.
• Local populations and local traditions in Ayodhya were neglected in the rush to construct a political symbol, turning residents into an opposition force.
• A climate of fear was systematically created where saints and mahants remained silent about years of alleged misconduct, afraid of losing control of their own institutions.
• The distinction between a religious institution and a political organization was deliberately erased, making independent religious voices nearly impossible to hear.

CH5: The ritual of a compelling future focus

From the book "Leadership Wisdom From The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari" by Robin Sharma
CH5: The ritual of a compelling future focus

# ON ACTION

#1.1 "Information alone is not power. Power and competitive advantage come only when sound information is decisively acted upon".

#1.2 "The key to improving your leadership performance is to passionately act on it."

# ON PEOPLE

#2.1 "There is no such thing as an unmotivated person, only an unmotivated employee."

#2.2 "Every single person on this planet has the ability to get excited and motivated about something. The leader's primary task is to get his team excited and motivated about the Compelling Cause that is his vision. Rather than constantly ordering your people to work toward the future goals you have developed, why not give them a reason to do so."

# ON VISION
An Activity

Compare these two mission statements and pick which one sounds better:

#3.1 "To be the preferred supplier of our customers, to create high quality products and to grow into a five-billion-dollar company within five years."

#3.2 "GlobalView is passionately committed to saving the lives of men, women, and children by providing our customers with cutting-edge, high-value software that allows them to brilliantly serve their patients' needs. Our five-year goal is to save the lives of over five-million people and make a significant and lasting impact on the health-care industry."

Indian Railways Cracks Down on Digital Ticket Misuse: Screenshots and WhatsApp Forwards Invalid

See All Articles

5 Key Takeaways

• Screenshots, PDFs, and forwarded WhatsApp tickets are no longer accepted as valid unreserved tickets.
• Only the original live ticket inside the Rail One app on the same registered mobile phone and number is valid.
• The digital unreserved ticket must be purchased before the train departs from the boarding station; otherwise it is invalid.
• The new rule applies only to digital unreserved tickets; reserved tickets with ID verification are not affected.
• Passengers must keep the booking phone with them and ensure it is charged, as inability to display the app live results in a penalty.

---

Indian Railways

Indian Railways Cracks Down on Digital Ticket Misuse: Why Screenshots and WhatsApp Forwards Won't Work Anymore

A quiet but significant change alters how millions travel — forwarded screenshots and PDFs are no longer valid. The era of easy digital sharing is over.

July 2026 Raipur Division, Indian Railways 8 min read

If you are among the millions of Indians who have switched to booking railway tickets through a smartphone app, a quiet but significant change may alter the way you travel. A forwarded screenshot or a PDF sitting in your gallery is no longer a valid ticket. Indian Railways has drawn a hard line: for unreserved journeys, nothing short of the live, original ticket inside the official Rail One app, on the very phone that booked it, will be accepted. Backed by a fresh advisory and a fresh penalty on a passenger, the message is unambiguous. The era of easy digital sharing of tickets is over, and every traveller needs to understand why.

The Background: Why Digital Unreserved Tickets Became Popular

For years, standing in long queues at railway stations to buy an unreserved ticket was the default experience for short-distance travellers and daily commuters. The introduction of the Rail One app—a purpose-built mobile application by Indian Railways—changed that. It allowed passengers to purchase unreserved tickets directly from their phones without visiting a counter. The service covers journeys where seats are not pre-assigned, such as general compartments on many passenger and express trains.

The convenience, however, came with an unintended side effect. Passengers began sharing tickets as screenshots, PDFs, or forwarded images on WhatsApp. A family member would book a ticket for someone else, take a screenshot, and send it across. The recipient would then board the train believing they held valid proof of purchase. For a while, checking staff often accepted these informally, or at least did not uniformly penalise travellers. But that leniency is now gone.

The New Rule: What Exactly Has Changed

On July 9, 2026, Indian Railways issued a clear statement through its commercial wing: a digital unreserved ticket is valid only when it is displayed as the original ticket inside the Rail One app on the same mobile phone and same registered mobile number used to generate it. The advisory specifically declares the following as invalid for travel:

• Screenshots of the ticket
• Photographs of the ticket (including those taken from another screen)
• PDF copies
• Tickets forwarded through WhatsApp, Telegram, or any other messaging platform

A ticket that cannot be verified live in the app is no longer considered a valid travel document. The railway administration underlined that this is not a mere suggestion—non-compliance will lead to penalties as per railway rules.

One Incident That Illustrates the Crackdown

Case Study

The Korba-Visakhapatnam Link Express Incident

The renewed strictness did not materialise in a vacuum. A recent episode aboard Train No. 18517, the Korba-Visakhapatnam Link Express, brought the issue into sharp focus. A woman passenger travelling from Korba to Raipur was fined after she presented a WhatsApp screenshot of her ticket during a routine check.

When the travelling ticket examiner (TTE), Kumari Ankita, inspected the ticket, she noticed two critical flaws:

1. The ticket had been generated at 4:45 pm, whereas the train had already departed Korba station at 4:10 pm.
2. The ticket was not present on the passenger's own registered mobile number; it had been booked by her brother and forwarded through WhatsApp.

Both discrepancies violated the digital ticketing conditions. The screenshot was promptly declared invalid, and the passenger was fined in accordance with the laid-down rules.

This incident is not an isolated anomaly. It reflects a pattern that railways has been observing—passengers boarding trains with tickets booked after the train's departure, or sharing a single ticket among multiple travellers by circulating screenshots. The new advisory aims to plug these exact loopholes.

The Logic Behind the "Original Ticket on Registered Device" Mandate

To a layperson, the requirement to show a ticket "inside the app" might seem needlessly rigid. After all, a screenshot is just a picture of the same digital ticket. The railway's reasoning, however, is rooted in real-time verification and fraud prevention.

A digital unreserved ticket generated through the Rail One app is linked to a unique transaction ID, a registered mobile number, and a timestamp. When the app displays that ticket, the inspecting official can cross-check its validity against the railway's central database in real time. A screenshot, on the other hand, is a static image. It can be edited, duplicated, or even shared with multiple people simultaneously. There is no way to verify instantly whether the same image has already been used for another journey. By insisting on the live ticket inside the Rail One app, railways ensures that each ticket is accounted for exactly once and can be dynamically invalidated once the journey is complete.

Furthermore, tying the ticket to a specific registered mobile device discourages the illegal practice of "ticket pooling," where a single purchase is circulated among several travellers through forwarded images. It also prevents a scenario where someone books a ticket after a train has already left the station—perhaps because they missed it—and then tries to use it for a later train or a different passenger, which is what happened in the Korba-Visakhapatnam Express case.

The Crucial Condition: Booked Before Departure

Another often-overlooked rule that the railways explicitly reiterated is that an unreserved digital ticket must be purchased before the train departs from the passenger's boarding station. A ticket generated even a minute after the scheduled departure time is treated as invalid, regardless of whether it appears correctly in the Rail One app. This condition closes a significant gap. Prior to the tighter enforcement, some passengers would wait until the train started moving, and then quickly book a ticket on the app, assuming the ticket checker would not notice the timestamp. Now, ticket examiners are mandated to check the booking time against the train's departure log.

Official Voice: Awadhesh Kumar Trivedi Clarifies

To remove any remaining ambiguity, Awadhesh Kumar Trivedi, Senior Divisional Commercial Manager (DCM) for Raipur Division, addressed the public in clear terms:

"An unreserved digital ticket generated through the Rail One app is valid only when it is available on the same mobile phone and registered number used for booking."

He went further to explicitly rule out all workarounds passengers might attempt:

"Copies of tickets shared via WhatsApp, screenshots or PDF files would not be accepted during ticket verification. Passengers must present the original ticket within the app, and digital bookings made after a train has departed from the station will not be considered valid."

This is not a guideline that varies from division to division. Raipur's statement aligns with a pan-India push by Indian Railways to standardise digital ticket checks. So wherever you board your train, the expectation remains the same.

What This Means for the Everyday Passenger

For the vast majority of passengers who already book their own tickets and travel with the same phone, the change is almost invisible. As long as the Rail One app is on the device and the phone remains charged, the verification process takes only a few seconds. The real impact falls on those who have grown accustomed to relying on tickets booked by family members, friends, or colleagues.

If your brother books a ticket for you from his phone, you cannot simply receive a WhatsApp screenshot and board the train. The only legitimate ways to travel are:

1. Book the ticket from your own smartphone using the Rail One app registered with your own mobile number.
2. If you do not have a smartphone, you can still purchase a paper unreserved ticket from a railway counter or an Automatic Ticket Vending Machine. The rules for paper tickets remain unchanged.
3. If a family member wants to book a ticket on your behalf, they must do so using your registered mobile number and your device, or accompany you with that device during the journey. The ticket must remain live and verifiable.

The Railway's Advisory: Simple Precautions to Avoid Penalties

In its public communication, the railway administration has also issued a set of practical recommendations for passengers:

1. Keep the booking phone with you – The phone used to generate the ticket must travel with the passenger. Leaving it at home or with the person who booked it renders the ticket unverifiable.

2. Charge your phone adequately – A dead battery during a ticket check will be treated as inability to present a valid ticket, even if the booking is genuine. Carrying a power bank is a wise precaution.

3. Verify details before boarding – The station name, journey date, and other ticket particulars must be checked before the train departs. Mistakes can only be corrected before boarding; once on the train, any discrepancy invites penalty.

4. Do not rely on forwarded copies – No matter how clear or official-looking a screenshot or PDF may be, it has no standing during inspection.

Officials have warned that incorrect ticket details or the inability to display the original digital ticket during inspection could lead to inconvenience, fines, or even being asked to disembark and purchase a fresh ticket.

A Note on Reserved Tickets: Not Covered by These Rules

It is important to understand that these instructions apply exclusively to digital unreserved tickets booked through the Rail One app. Reserved tickets—those booked for specific seats or berths in sleeper and AC classes, either online through the IRCTC portal or via counters—are not governed by this advisory. For reserved journeys, identity verification through government-issued photo ID is already mandatory. A passenger with a reserved ticket can carry a printout, a PDF on their phone, or even an SMS confirmation, because the ticket checker cross-references the name and ID with the passenger manifest. The same risks of duplication do not apply in the reserved category since each ticket is tied to an individual's identity.

Nevertheless, for the millions who travel daily in general compartments, the new digital ticket discipline is a significant shift.

Why Now: The Larger Push Against Ticketless Travel

This move fits into a broader strategy by Indian Railways to reduce ticketless and irregular travel. Despite the availability of digital booking, a considerable percentage of passengers still travel without proper tickets, relying on the belief that checks are infrequent or that a casual screenshot would suffice. Railways loses substantial revenue to such practices each year. By making the verification process technologically foolproof, the administration hopes to plug the leakage.

Simultaneously, there is a push to make ticketing more secure and passenger-friendly. The Rail One app itself has been updated over time to handle high user loads and to provide a seamless experience, but its full potential can only be realised when passengers follow the designed workflow rather than taking shortcuts through third-party messaging apps.

What Lies Ahead: Will Passengers Adapt?

Any change in established behaviour meets initial resistance and confusion. Social media is already filling up with queries from travellers unsure about the new rules. Common questions include "Can my wife book my ticket and then I log in with her account on my phone?" The answer is no—the ticket is tied to a specific mobile number and the app's registration. Even if you log in with the same credentials on a different device, the ticket may not validate correctly because the railway's backend associates the booking with the device ID used at the time of purchase. Railways is likely to issue further clarifications as edge cases emerge.

The incident on the Korba-Visakhapatnam Link Express also serves as a practical precedent. It signals that ticket examiners have been trained to look specifically for the live app interface, the timestamp of booking, and the registered mobile number. Ignorance of the rule will not be accepted as a defence.

For passengers, the safest approach going forward is to treat the Rail One app ticket like a paper ticket that cannot be photocopied. The app must be personally present, functioning, and open to the correct ticket at the moment of inspection. Digital convenience, paradoxically, now demands a touch more personal responsibility.

---

Digital ticketing was meant to simplify travel, not complicate it. However, the ease of copying and forwarding digital passes created a grey zone that Indian Railways has now decisively closed. By insisting on the original, device-bound, pre-departure digital ticket, the system aims to protect honest passengers, cut revenue losses, and ensure that every ticket counted is a ticket paid for. The rules are clear, the penalties are real, and the only way forward is to book your own ticket on your own phone, keep it charged, and board your train with the confidence that your travel document is truly valid.

Read more