Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Dell shrinks workforce by 10% for second straight year (Mar 2026)

See All Articles on Layoffs
<<< Previously

Dell's workforce continues to shrink, mirroring a trend across the AI-disrupted tech industry, Reuters reports. The computer and artificial intelligence server maker reported a 10% reduction in employees to 97,000 for fiscal 2026, equaling a loss of 11,000 jobs. Dell reported a similar decline in fiscal 2025. The latest cuts come as Silicon Valley attempts to justify its investments in AI, with 60 tech companies laying off more than 38,000 employees this year by one measure. Dell's stock is up 22% this year.

Day 18: US-Iran War


See All News by Ravish Kumar
<<< Previously

The headline arrives before the truth

On March 17, 2026, Israel claimed it had struck at the top of Iran’s power structure again — this time targeting Ali Larijani, one of Iran’s most senior security figures, and also claiming a strike on Basij commander Gholamreza Soleimani. But even as those announcements raced through television studios and timelines, the facts were still unsettled. Reuters reported that Larijani’s fate remained unclear, while Iran had not confirmed either death. That uncertainty is not a side note. It is the story. In this war, the claim itself is part of the weapon. First comes the headline, then the atmosphere, and only later — if at all — the truth. Reuters+1

This is why one has to be careful with triumphalism. When a war becomes saturated with declarations of “we got him,” “we eliminated him,” “we struck the nerve center,” it is tempting to assume that military decapitation equals strategic victory. But war is not a press release. It is not a social-media graphic. It is not a photograph of a leader on the phone. It is a test of whether the targeted state can still retaliate, still impose costs, still bend markets, still frighten neighbors, still shape decisions far beyond its borders. On that test, Iran has not disappeared. Reuters+1

Kill the leaders, but the war does not end

For nearly three weeks now, the argument behind the U.S.-Israeli campaign has seemed straightforward: strike the leadership, degrade the command structure, and the rest will unravel. Yet the opposite impression has begun to take hold. U.S. intelligence reporting cited by Reuters says Iran’s government is not at immediate risk of collapse despite the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on February 28 and sustained bombing since then. Other reporting suggests the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has, if anything, consolidated power inside the system. The state may be wounded, but it is not absent. Reuters+1

That matters because this war has exposed the limits of the fantasy that a country can be bombed into political obedience from above. Iran has kept the Strait of Hormuz at the center of the crisis, continued missile and drone pressure across the region, and retained leverage over the global oil route that handles roughly a fifth of the world’s oil and gas trade. If the point was to prove overwhelming control, the result has been the opposite: the battlefield widened, shipping slowed, energy prices jumped, and governments across Asia began preparing for shortages. Reuters+2Reuters+2

So the basic question remains: if the top is being hit and yet the state still shapes events, what exactly has been achieved? Military power can destroy buildings. It can kill commanders. It can terrorize populations. But it cannot automatically produce political submission. This war has now made that lesson visible in public. The leadership is under attack, and yet Iran still has the capacity to force the world to negotiate with geography. Reuters+1

The real battlefield is Hormuz

The most important map in this war is not the map of airstrikes. It is the map of the Strait of Hormuz. That is where military violence turns into economic language. That is where a missile becomes inflation, where strategy becomes shortage, where geopolitics enters the kitchen. India’s foreign minister told the Financial Times, in remarks reported by Reuters, that there was no “blanket arrangement” for Indian ships and that each passage had to be handled individually. That one sentence reveals the whole fragility of the moment: diplomacy is now ship-by-ship, exception-by-exception, plea-by-plea. Reuters

Reuters reported that Iran allowed two Indian-flagged LPG tankers to pass through the strait, but India still has 22 vessels stranded around the region and continues to seek safe passage for more. Separately, New Delhi denied reports of a quid pro quo involving three tankers seized in Indian waters, while confirming that talks with Tehran are continuing. This is not normal trade. This is bargaining under the shadow of war. Reuters+2Reuters+2

And if anyone still believes a naval show of force can simply switch the old order back on, the head of the International Maritime Organization has already warned otherwise. Naval escorts, he said, cannot guarantee safe passage and are not a sustainable solution. That is an important point. The strait is not just a lane to be patrolled; it is a chokepoint controlled by fear, calculation, and political will. Once a war reaches Hormuz, no admiral can promise normalcy on command. Reuters

The loneliness of Washington

The war has also revealed a second truth: military strength is not the same thing as diplomatic authority. President Donald Trump has been pressing allies to help reopen Hormuz, asking countries to send warships and contribute to escort missions. But Reuters reported that key partners including Germany, Spain, Italy and others declined, while Poland also made clear it would not send troops. The refusal is politically devastating because it shows that even governments aligned with Washington do not necessarily trust Washington’s judgment, timing, or endgame. Reuters+1

This is where the war begins to look less like command and more like isolation. Trump can still order strikes. He can still threaten escalation. He can still boast of targets hit. But when allies refuse to militarize his plan, the limits become visible. Reuters also reported that Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araqchi, rejected reports of fresh backchannel contact with Trump’s envoy after the war began and said such stories were being circulated to influence oil markets and public perception. Even diplomacy now seems to arrive wrapped in market signaling and confusion. Reuters+1

There is an even deeper irony here. Reuters reported that Gulf Arab states, while cautious in public, are pressing the United States to weaken Iran decisively because they fear what an unfinished war might mean for their future security and oil economies. So the same region that fears escalation also fears an inconclusive American exit. Public caution, private pressure. Strategic dependence, political hesitation. This is not leadership. It is a trap. Reuters

The war reaches South Asia’s kitchens

The war is not only in Tehran, Tel Aviv, Beirut, or the Gulf. It is in India’s gas cylinder. It is in the dhaba that cannot cook. It is in the hostel mess that starts serving reheated food. Reuters reported on March 17 that India is facing its worst LPG crunch in decades because shipping through Hormuz has been disrupted. Household demand has been prioritized, industrial and commercial use has been squeezed, and the crisis is already altering daily life. When a distant war begins to decide whether tea stalls, restaurants, and hostels can function, foreign policy stops being abstract. Reuters+1

This is not just an Indian story. The Associated Press reported that countries across Asia are moving into energy triage, conserving fuel and cutting usage as the conflict squeezes supply. Sri Lanka has already shifted to a four-day workweek to save oil and gas. Bangladesh and Pakistan have taken austerity steps of their own. Reuters also reported that Asia is pivoting toward coal as LNG supplies choke. In other words, war at sea is becoming dirtier air, costlier food, and harsher choices on land. AP News+2The Guardian+2

And the map of energy distress is even wider. Reuters reported that Cuba’s national electric grid collapsed on March 16, leaving around 10 million people in darkness, in a crisis worsened by a U.S.-tightened oil squeeze. That is why it is impossible to read this war narrowly. The same global order that talks of stability is producing blackouts in one place, gas shortages in another, and aviation disruption in a third. It is one system of punishment, not separate events. Reuters+1

When hospitals become targets and heritage becomes rubble

One of the most dangerous things a long war does is normalize the unthinkable. Hospitals begin to enter military vocabulary. Schools are reclassified through intelligence slides. Civilian sites become “adjacent infrastructure.” Reuters reported that the World Health Organization has verified 18 attacks on healthcare sites in Iran since the war began, with additional attacks documented in Lebanon. Six hospitals in Iran have been evacuated. This is not collateral rhetoric anymore; it is a pattern. Reuters+1

Reuters also investigated a girls’ school in Minab that was destroyed in a U.S. strike on February 28, reporting evidence that the site had long been visibly identifiable online and through satellite imagery. If a school can be mistaken, or ignored, or absorbed into the language of targeting, then the war has crossed a moral border that no strategic memo can repair. In Afghanistan too, Reuters reported that the Taliban government accused Pakistan of killing more than 400 people in a strike on a Kabul drug rehabilitation hospital, though Pakistan denied targeting civilians. India condemned that strike. Different wars, different actors, same collapse of restraint. Reuters+2Reuters+2

And there is something else being damaged beyond the living. UNESCO said at least four of Iran’s World Heritage Sites have suffered damage. At the same time, Al Jazeera reported that Iranian authorities say 56 heritage sites have been damaged or destroyed. Whether the independently verified number is four or the Iranian claim of 56, the meaning is grim enough: war does not only kill people; it also attacks memory, continuity, and civilization itself. Reuters+1

The dead are missing from the frame

Pope Leo has said something the media should hear very carefully. Reuters reported that he urged journalists to show war through the eyes of those who suffer, and warned against turning war into propaganda or entertainment. He also said violence cannot open the road to justice or peace, and called for a ceasefire. Those are not ornamental remarks from the Vatican. They are a rebuke to an era of war coverage that too often centers statements, maps, missiles, and men in power — and leaves the wounded in the margins. Reuters+1

Because look at how this war is now consumed. Drone footage. monochrome strike videos. arrows on maps. oil-price dashboards. alliance speculation. What gets lost is the cemetery. Reuters reported from Tehran’s Behesht-e Zahra cemetery, where families were burying relatives killed in the war that began on February 28. That is the real measure of a conflict: not how precise the animation looks, but how many fresh graves are being dug when the cameras move on. Reuters

The crisis in aviation tells the same story in another form. Reuters reported that the UAE briefly closed its airspace again on March 17 after missile and drone threats, following a drone-related fire near Dubai airport the day before. British Airways and KLM have both extended or maintained flight cuts in the region. Air travel, medicine logistics, family travel, migrant routes — all of it gets disrupted. Yet the conversation still returns, again and again, to strategic posture instead of human insecurity. Reuters+2Reuters+2

India’s uneasy mirror

India cannot watch this war as a spectator. The government itself said on March 3 that developments in the Gulf caused “great anxiety,” and nearly 10 million Indians in the region remain a central concern. That is the human side. The economic side is just as serious: ships, remittances, aviation, oil, LNG, LPG, fertilizers — all are exposed. Reuters has already reported disruptions to gas, shipping, and fertilizer supply chains affecting India. Reuters+2The Times of India+2

There is also a political mirror here. In February 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, Reuters reported that India was trying to evacuate about 16,000 nationals still stuck there; Operation Ganga soon became a major public exercise. Four years later, India is again confronting the vulnerability of its citizens abroad and the fragility of its supply lines, only this time the pressure is not only on students trapped in a war zone but also on workers, merchant crews, households, and small businesses linked to the Gulf. Reuters+2Press Information Bureau+2

The difference is that the West Asia crisis does not arrive in one dramatic television frame. It arrives in fragments: a stranded vessel, a delayed flight, a gas shortage, a diplomatic call, a market tremor. But fragments are still a full picture if you know how to connect them. That is what this war demands from India — not slogan, not performance, but clarity about dependence, risk, and the cost of pretending distance where there is none. Reuters+1

A world trapped in continuous war

If this moment feels familiar, that is because the world has been living inside one prolonged chain of conflict. Reuters reported in February 2022 on India’s scramble to evacuate citizens from Ukraine. Since October 2023, Gaza has remained a site of recurring Israeli strikes and death, with AP reporting that violence has continued despite a ceasefire framework. And now, since February 28, 2026, the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran has opened another front whose effects stretch from Lebanon to Dubai to India to Cuba. Reuters+2AP News+2

That continuity matters. War is no longer experienced as an exception that shocks the world into moral seriousness. It is being absorbed as routine. One day it is Ukraine. Another day Gaza. Then Lebanon. Then Iran. Then Kabul. Then a blackout elsewhere. The human nervous system adapts faster than the moral system reacts. That may be the most frightening part of all. We are not only witnessing destruction; we are also watching the normalization of destruction. Reuters+2Reuters+2

And so the final image of this war is not a bunker-buster, not a leader’s tweet, not even a closed strait. It is a broken world held together by logistics, fear, and exhaustion. Some states are still boasting. Some governments are still calculating. Some media outlets are still packaging war as strategy. But the ordinary person meets war in a simpler form: no gas, no flight, no medicine, no certainty, no sleep. Reuters+2Reuters+2

Trump’s Moving Script: From Bombs to Chess, From Boast to Bewilderment

One of the sharpest patterns in this war has been Trump’s constant movement from one point to another, often without any clear connection between his own statements. In one moment he is sitting at his desk admiring the B-2 bomber, almost aestheticizing destruction, speaking of its beauty and power. In another moment, he suddenly begins speaking the language of intelligence, subtlety, and strategy — praising Iranians as smart, high-IQ, intelligent people, even calling Iran a great power. It is as if the script shifts mid-sentence: first the celebration of force, then the discovery of complexity.

That inconsistency is not minor. It reveals a deeper confusion about what kind of conflict this is. When bombs are falling, the rhetoric is muscular. When the limits of those bombs begin to show, the rhetoric turns toward chess, toward negotiation, toward the intelligence of the adversary. The transcript points to this contradiction very clearly: leaders often feel unbeatable while ordering attacks, but the moment they are forced to think politically, they begin reaching for the language of strategy and caution. Trump appears to move exactly in that way — from the swagger of military power to the nervous respect of someone realizing the opponent is not easy to crush.

The inconsistency becomes even more visible in the way he speaks about escalation and support. At one point, he appeals to allied countries to help secure Hormuz, suggesting that reopening this route will require collective effort. But in another moment, he says he does not need anyone’s help. Which is it? If the mission requires global backing, then that is an admission of dependence. If no help is needed, then the earlier appeal begins to sound like weakness covered up by bravado.
Trump keeps shifting between commanding the world and complaining that the world is not standing beside him.

There is also a contradiction between surprise and warning. Trump says he was shocked that Iran struck neighboring countries, as though this was some unforeseen escalation. But the point raised here is simple: Iran had already warned that places used to attack it would be treated as hostile bases. If those warnings existed in advance, then surprise is not innocence — it is either ignorance or performance. This makes Trump appear less like a commander in control and more like a leader constantly reacting to consequences he should have anticipated.

Even his public communication style reflects that drift. One answer does not connect to the next. He threatens the press, yet remains surrounded by reporters. He projects certainty, yet keeps exposing uncertainty. He speaks as though events are under control, then suddenly sounds isolated, disappointed, and frustrated by allies. He praises force, then leans on the language of deal-making. He mocks complexity, then discovers it too late.

That is why the inconsistency matters politically. It is not only about changing tone. It is about the collapse of coherence. A leader who keeps shifting from bombast to confusion, from unilateral confidence to requests for help, from surprise to denial, does not merely look contradictory. He begins to look lonely, exposed, and overtaken by the very war he helped unleash.

Criticisms

  • Nation and State Leaders: Leaders are announcing killings before independent confirmation. By doing this, they are not only waging war on an enemy, they are also waging war on public understanding.

  • Israel, the United States, and All Warring Powers: Hospitals, schools, and medical spaces are being pulled into the logic of war. A war that keeps reaching civilian sites cannot claim moral seriousness.

  • Trump and the U.S. Leadership: After starting a war, they are complaining that allies are not carrying it forward for them. That is not strength. It shows the limits of reckless power.

  • Gulf Governments: They appear cautious in public, but they seem to want Iran weakened decisively in private. This kind of strategic ambiguity leaves ordinary people to pay the price for elite calculation.

  • Mainstream War Media: War is being turned into graphics, missile footage, strategic maps, and dramatic analysis, while the dead, the wounded, and the displaced are pushed out of the frame.

  • Governments Backing or Extending the War: They are treating fuel shocks, shipping disruption, shortages, and blackouts as secondary effects, when in reality these are the real consequences faced by ordinary people.

  • Political and Military Establishments Everywhere: They speak casually about war, but it is never they who first suffer its consequences. The people who pay first are families dealing with fear, inflation, shortages, and uncertainty.

Monday, March 16, 2026

In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts (Book Summary)


See other book summaries on "Psychology"
Download Book    <<< Previously (on Psychology)



Addiction, the Hungry Ghost, and the Emptiness We Keep Feeding

A shocking story, and a larger problem

Friends, a little while ago I came across a piece of news that honestly shocked me. You may have heard it too. A young man from Bihar—what you would probably call lower middle class, or maybe somewhere around that modest middle-class reality—ended up under a debt of ₹96 lakh. Ninety-six lakh. Almost one crore rupees.

Why?

Because he got trapped in an addiction: online gaming.

The same online gaming ecosystem that is advertised everywhere. The same one promoted by major celebrities and cricketers. The same one that is sold to people as harmless fun, entertainment, excitement. He got so deeply trapped in it that he began borrowing money. The fees that had been paid for his tuition, the money his family had saved and handed over for his B.Tech education—he put all of that into online gaming. Everything was ruined.

The situation became so bad that he reportedly got involved in fraudulent activities as well. His mental state deteriorated. He stopped speaking properly with people around him. His relationships and social ties started collapsing. Naturally, all of this must have been mentally exhausting. And things reached such a dark point that he even attempted suicide.

This came out when a News18 anchor, Prateek Trivedi, was taking what seemed like a random interview, and then this reality surfaced.

But the point is not just that one boy.

If you look carefully at Indian society today, you will see that many people are trapped in addictions—big addictions, small addictions, respectable addictions, shameful addictions. And these addictions are quietly, steadily, literally ruining lives.

That is why today’s conversation matters.

This is not just about “those” addicts. This is about all of us

Recently I was reading and listening to discussions around a book called In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts. At first I thought this would be a book only about extreme addiction, about people on the margins, about severe cases. But when I started learning more about the book, about its author, and about the ideas in it, I found them deeply interesting.

Because yes, the book talks about addiction—but it is not limited only to people we normally label as “addicts.” In fact, it is relevant to you, to me, to almost everyone living in modern society.

Why do I say that?

Because the author gives a very striking definition. He says addiction can be understood as any short-term behavior that gives us short-term pleasure, but harms us in the long term.

Listen to that carefully.

Any short-term behavior that gives us temporary pleasure, but causes long-term harm—that is addiction.

Now if you apply this definition honestly, then addiction is no longer a word reserved only for drugs, alcohol, or gambling. Suddenly it becomes a mirror. A very uncomfortable mirror.

Because then you and I both have to admit that we engage in many such behaviors. Things that feel good in the moment, give relief in the moment, distract us in the moment—but slowly damage our lives.

So when this definition is expanded, many different addictions begin to appear in front of us.

Eleven addictions hiding in plain sight

Now if I start naming different forms of addiction, I am almost certain that at least one of them will be found in your life, or in the life of someone around you.

Social media addiction.
Procrastination.
Addiction to consuming too much knowledge without action.
Addiction to unhealthy food.
Sedentary lifestyle.
Negative thinking.
Alcohol and other substances.
People-pleasing.
Impulse spending.
Poor time management.
Sleep deprivation.

All of these, by that definition, can fall under addiction.

And this is important, because many people imagine addiction only as some dramatic external collapse. But a person’s life can be damaged slowly as well. Quietly. Respectably. Through patterns that society almost normalizes.

So I really want you to think about this seriously: how many of these problems are there in your own life? And even if not in your life, then in the lives of people around you? Because if even one such pattern is there, then this entire conversation becomes relevant.

The “Hungry Ghost” and the endless hunger of modern life

There is a concept in Buddhist philosophy often described as the “Wheel of Life.” At the top there is heaven, where the most virtuous beings go. Below that are other realms. And one of these is the human realm, where there is neither total goodness nor total evil, but a mixture—a field of struggle, confusion, craving, suffering, and possibility.

Then there are darker realms too. But one idea that becomes especially powerful here is about “The realm of hungry ghosts.”

This is the concept from which the book takes its title.

What is a hungry ghost? It is a being that keeps consuming and consuming and consuming, but is never satisfied. No matter how much it takes in, it cannot fill itself. Its hunger remains. Its emptiness remains.

Is that not an extraordinary metaphor for our age?

People keep eating, scrolling, buying, chasing, watching, drinking, consuming, seeking validation, seeking thrill, seeking distraction—and yet remain empty. The stomach of the hungry ghost does not fill. The inner hole remains open.

That is why this concept is so useful. It helps us understand that addiction is not just about consumption. It is about insatiability. It is about trying to fill an emptiness with things that cannot truly fill it.

Addiction is everywhere—and society sees only one kind of addict

If you ask people to imagine an addict, what image comes to mind? Usually they picture a person taking drugs, intoxicated, visibly unstable, someone on the streets or someone in obvious crisis.

But that is only one image.

The author’s point is that addicts can also be highly functional, highly successful, even admired people. Sometimes their addiction is not to heroin or alcohol. Sometimes it is to power. To status. To work. To success. To domination. To achievement.

And here, there is a correction worth making: when an example comes up around historical obsession and conquest, the right reference is not Napoleon Hill. It is Napoleon Bonaparte.

The point being made is larger than one person. Society often celebrates certain addictions when they produce outward success. We glorify relentless ambition, compulsive achievement, obsession with winning, obsession with legacy. We do not always ask: what inner emptiness is driving this person? What are they running from? What are they trying to prove? What wound is hidden beneath all this conquest?

So the addict is not always the person we pity. Sometimes the addict is the person society praises.

What is “addiction culture”?

The podcast’s next important idea is about culture.

In science, especially in biology, the word “culture” can refer to a controlled environment in which microorganisms—fungi, bacteria, cells—are grown and maintained. If that environment supports life, the organisms thrive. If it becomes toxic, then those living things start becoming unhealthy or begin to die.

Now take that idea and apply it to society.

What kind of culture are we living in?

A healthy one? Or a toxic one?

The argument here is that we are living in a toxic culture—one that is deeply out of sync with actual human needs. Human beings need security, connection, affection, belonging, rest, meaning, and emotional safety. But the culture around us keeps pushing speed, comparison, insecurity, distraction, overstimulation, and performance.

So what happens? Anxiety rises. Depression rises. Loneliness rises. Disconnection rises. And addictions rise.

In that sense, addiction is not just an individual defect. It is also the result of an unhealthy social environment.

The childhood wound: what happens to a child becomes a pattern in the adult

The author also speaks from personal experience, and this is where things become very human. He talks about how traumatic his childhood was, during the Nazi period. His mother had to send him away in order to protect him, to save him. From the outside, this was an act of love and survival.

But what does a child understand?

A child does not understand geopolitics, war, fascism, historical catastrophe. A child experiences separation. A child may interpret it as abandonment. A child may think: maybe I am the reason. Maybe I was not worth keeping close. Maybe I am unsafe. Maybe love disappears.

This is one of the key insights: children personalize emotional reality. If the mother is stressed, the child may feel, “I caused it.” If the parent is happy, the child may feel, “I am the reason.” Children are not rational analysts. They are receivers of emotional atmosphere.

So when a child grows up with fear, instability, neglect, or emotional absence, that child does not simply “move on.” That child becomes an adult carrying certain beliefs: I am not enough. I must earn love. I must perform to matter. I must keep others pleased. I am safe only if I am useful. I am lovable only when I achieve.

And then later in life, many addictions grow on top of these old wounds.

Trauma is not only what happened. Trauma is also what did not happen

This is another very important point.

When people hear the word trauma, they think only of very dramatic bad events—violence, abuse, major loss, severe crisis. And yes, those are traumas. But trauma can also be something else.

Trauma can be what did not happen.

A child who needed comfort but was not comforted.
A child who needed affection but did not receive it.
A child who was frightened and nobody said, “It’s okay, I’m here.”
A child who needed one hug, one moment of protection, one sense of safety—and did not get it.

That absence can shape a life.

Sometimes the hole inside a person is not huge in a theatrical way. Sometimes it is simple and devastating. Maybe all that was missing was safety. Maybe all that was missing was one emotionally available adult.

And when that missing experience is not provided, the person may spend decades searching for substitutes.

Why punishment does not solve addiction

When society sees addiction, its instinct is often punishment.

Put them in jail. Shame them. Cut them off. Make them suffer. Teach them a lesson.

But one of the strongest arguments in this framework is that you cannot punish pain out of a person. If addiction is rooted in suffering, loneliness, trauma, inner fragmentation, and unmet emotional needs, then punishment very often intensifies the original problem.

If the reason someone became addicted was loneliness, then prison may deepen loneliness. If shame was part of the wound, public humiliation deepens shame. If the person already feels broken, then being treated as fully disposable only confirms the wound.

That does not mean harmful actions should be ignored. It means that if the goal is healing, then understanding matters more than moral grandstanding.

Someone once put this beautifully: you cannot end a person’s pain by punishing them for having pain. If you really want to reduce pain, you have to understand it.

That is the difference between a system that merely reacts and a system that actually heals.

Even the word “addiction” points to slavery

There is also a fascinating point about the word itself.

The idea is traced to a Latin root related to a person who fell into debt and could not repay it. Such a person could become enslaved. Bound. Claimed. Reduced to dependence and submission.

That history matters because it reveals something symbolic: the addict becomes a slave. Not necessarily to a master in the old physical sense, but to a behavior, a craving, a substance, a pattern, a compulsion.

And that image is powerful.

Many people today are walking around carrying chains they cannot even see clearly. Chains of phone use. Chains of approval-seeking. Chains of consumption. Chains of nicotine. Chains of lust. Chains of gambling. Chains of work. Chains of thought patterns.

They are walking, functioning, talking—but still bound.

Pleasure and pain: the two engines behind addiction

Another important point is that addiction is usually serving one of two functions: either it is chasing pleasure, or it is reducing pain.

Sometimes both at once.

That is why it is not enough to say, “This thing is bad, stop it.” You have to understand what that behavior is doing for the person. What need is it meeting? What discomfort is it softening? What emptiness is it covering?

Because if you only remove the surface behavior without understanding the root, then either the same addiction returns, or it gets replaced by another.

This is why root-cause thinking matters.

If someone has a cold, you do not just keep wiping the nose forever without understanding what is going on in the body. In the same way, addiction treatment cannot stop at visible symptoms. You have to ask why this person is needing this pattern in the first place.

The gambling brain: anticipation can be more intoxicating than winning

There is a very striking point made about gambling. When researchers studied what happens in the brain, an interesting pattern emerged. The brain did not simply light up at the moment of winning. In many cases, the strongest activation came in anticipation—in the betting, in the uncertainty, in the possibility.

That means the thrill is not only the reward. The thrill is also the suspense.

And suddenly many things start making sense.

Why do people keep returning to betting even after loss? Why does online gaming, online gambling, and speculative digital behavior become so sticky? Because the person gets hooked not only on the outcome, but on the emotional high of expectation.

In simple words: sometimes the excitement before the result is as powerful as, or even more powerful than, the result itself.

And this applies beyond gambling. Social media works this way too. Refreshing, waiting, checking, scrolling—the next thing might give pleasure. That anticipation becomes its own drug.

Loneliness is one of the biggest roots

Among the biggest drivers of addiction, loneliness stands out.

Why do people smoke, drink, binge, scroll, numb themselves, or keep returning to harmful patterns? Often because disconnection is unbearable. The act becomes a substitute companion. A ritual. A way of not being alone with oneself.

This also connects back to parents and families. Children absorb the emotional environment of the home very deeply. If parents are bitter, chronically stressed, emotionally absent, or full of unresolved pain, then children grow inside that climate.

And often, generational problems keep repeating like loops.

The weaknesses, wounds, emotional deficiencies, and unhealed patterns of one generation can flow into the next. Addiction sometimes brings these hidden wounds to the surface. In that sense, painful as it is, addiction can also become an opportunity—a golden opportunity for healing, for honest family conversations, for breaking old cycles.

But only if people are willing to talk.

Cue, routine, reward: how addictions are built

Now this brings us to the behavioral pattern.

A cue appears. Then comes a routine. Then comes a reward.

For example, imagine you have a friend with whom you always drink. Just seeing that friend becomes the cue. Meeting them, going to the same place, following the same pattern becomes the routine. Then drinking gives the reward.

Cue. Routine. Reward.

And this cycle is how habits and addictions become reinforced.

So if you want to weaken an addiction, you have to break this pattern somewhere. Reduce the cues. Change the routine. Replace the reward.

Do not meet the friend who always drags you into the same destructive behavior. Do not go to the same place. Do not follow the same script. Get a different reward—food, exercise, conversation, reading, movement, creative work, anything healthier.

This is also why environment matters so much. Recovery is not just about inner willpower. It is also about restructuring the pattern of life.

Treatment begins with one honest question

When it comes to treatment, the first question is not, “How do I stop?”

The first question is: what did I get from this behavior? And what was missing in my life that this behavior fulfilled?

That is a difficult question, but a necessary one.

Maybe the addiction gave you community. Maybe it gave you relief. Maybe it made you feel seen. Maybe it gave structure to your day. Maybe it numbed emotional pain. Maybe it made you feel alive. Maybe it helped you avoid despair.

Once you understand what function it was serving, then you have to replace it with something healthier that meets the same need without destroying you.

This is the core idea: nobody becomes addicted for no reason. There is pain somewhere. There is lack somewhere. There is a missing piece somewhere. The addictive behavior rushes in to fill that gap.

So healing is not just subtraction. It is replacement with care.

How to deal with addicted people: compassion, not superiority

From years of experience, the strongest message here is that the best way to deal with addicted people is compassion.

Not superiority. Not disgust. Not preaching.

Compassion means trying to understand the gap inside them, the wound inside them, the pain they are trying to manage. You may not be able to forcefully heal someone. But you can stop making them more ashamed of being hurt.

And that matters.

Because addicts are often already drowning in self-hatred, guilt, and humiliation. What they need is not always more scolding. Often what they need is to be seen without contempt.

If you are struggling yourself: a four-step process

Now if you yourself are dealing with an addiction or harmful habit, one practical process can help:

1. Notice the urge

The first thing is to notice that the urge is arising. Not after you have acted. Before.

2. Pause and observe

Do not immediately obey it. Watch it. Feel it. Notice what is happening in the body and mind.

3. Let it pass

If you do not act on every urge, something interesting happens: the wave rises, but then it starts fading. Its force weakens.

4. Repeat

Keep repeating this. Daily. Again and again. That is how one gradually builds distance from automatic compulsion.

This sounds simple, but it takes practice. Still, it is one of the most useful ways of reclaiming agency.

Support systems and leverage matter

We are social creatures. That is a fact.

If you are always around people who normalize your worst habits, then recovery becomes harder. If you are around people who normalize better habits, then recovery becomes easier.

Suppose you are addicted to the phone, but you spend time with people who naturally keep their phones away and read books. Over time, a social pressure appears. The environment itself begins helping you.

That is why support systems matter. Recovery is easier when you are not trying to do it in isolation.

There was also an example of someone who had a severe gambling problem from a young age, even borrowing against future income, making life miserable for himself. But what changed him was that he redirected that energy. Instead of gambling destructively, he got involved in flipping houses and real estate activity in a more constructive way.

Now, of course, not every replacement is equal, and not every story will look the same. But the principle is useful: sometimes an addictive drive can be redirected into a healthier channel if the underlying hunger is understood.

The deepest healing is inner healing

Still, all the tips and tricks in the world are not enough if inner healing does not happen.

That is the central point.

A person has to understand what hollowness exists within. What is missing. What pain remains unresolved. What love, safety, meaning, or emotional completion is absent.

Only when that inner gap is approached with honesty and care does deeper recovery begin.

Otherwise a person will keep jumping from one thing to another. From money to achievement, from achievement to pleasure, from pleasure to distraction, from distraction to more emptiness. And each time they will think: maybe the next thing will finally give peace.

Money can give comfort. Achievement can give satisfaction. Material success can absolutely make parts of life easier. But peace is something else.

Peace does not arrive automatically with deals, income, purchases, or status.

Spirituality, peace, and the path to healing

And here the speaker turns personal, and I think that matters. Because at some point this is no longer just theory.

For many people, real peace comes through spirituality. Through prayer. Through remembrance of God. Through religious practice. Through surrender. Through silence. Through returning to something deeper than the ego’s endless chasing.

This is not being said as a slogan. It is being said from lived experience: that the peace one gets from remembering God, from prayer, from devotion, from spiritual practice, is not the same as the temporary pleasure of earning more, closing bigger deals, or acquiring more material success.

Those things may feel good. But their effect is often superficial and temporary.

Deep peace is different.

And in a country like India, where spirituality still has meaning for millions, it is worth saying openly that for many people this can become a real path toward healing. Not the only path, but an important one.

Healthy anger, attention, and what we still do not know how to express

There is also a brief but important point about healthy anger. Many people in India do not know how to express anger in a healthy way. Either anger gets suppressed, or it comes out destructively. But learning how to feel and express anger cleanly, truthfully, and without self-destruction is part of psychological health.

There is also a reflection on attention deficiency and ADHD-like patterns—how when a person cannot fight, cannot flee, cannot resolve something, the mind begins scattering. Attention splinters. Focus collapses. The person starts moving from one thing to another.

These are not small matters. They remind us that many behaviors we casually judge may have deeper roots in stress, survival, and unresolved emotional states.

Final thought

So yes, this whole discussion may have begun with one shocking news story. But it does not end there.

It opens into a much larger question: what is addiction really, where does it come from, why are so many people trapped in it, and what would actual healing require?

If you are struggling with any major addiction, or if someone in your family is struggling—something that is damaging mental health, physical health, finances, peace, and relationships—then this conversation is not abstract. It is urgent.

The biggest takeaway is this: do not stop at the surface. Do not reduce addiction to weakness. Do not reduce healing to punishment. Look deeper. There is almost always pain. There is almost always emptiness. There is almost always something missing that the person has been trying to replace in the wrong way.

And if you can understand that, then recovery stops looking like mere control and starts looking like compassion, awareness, replacement, support, inner repair, and peace.

That is the real path.

And that is why this topic deserves much deeper discussion.

Tags: Book Summary,Psychology,Behavioral Science,