Thursday, July 9, 2026

Drowning in Delusion: Why Our Cities Compare Themselves to Venice When They Can’t Even Drain Water

See All Articles

Drowning in Delusion: Why Our Cities Compare Themselves to Venice When They Can’t Even Drain Water

The moment the first monsoon cloud rumble over the Gangetic plains, an old, tired ritual begins. Water invades our streets, our homes, our parking lots. And with equal predictability, social media lights up with a peculiar comparison: “Look, Ghaziabad has become Venice!” or “Welcome to the Venice of Noida.” As if a drowned underpass and a submerged scooter were evidence of a metamorphosis into a romantic lagoon city. But pause. Is this praise for Ghaziabad, or a casual, unthinking insult to a city that has survived fourteen centuries with engineering that still holds? This annual metaphor is not just lazy journalism—it is a symptom of a deep civic decay that our rulers have normalised, and we have compliantly accepted. Every monsoon, our leaders return to their pre‑rain promises of turning cities into Paris, London, or Singapore. Yet by the first downpour, we are forced to gaze at a dirty puddle and call it Venice. The gap between rhetoric and reality is not just a failure of drainage; it is a monument to systemic corruption, voter apathy, and an administrative class that has perfected the art of pretending.

The Venice Mirage: A Medieval City That Outlives Our Flyovers

Venice has a network of canals that function like highways. Its iconic Rialto Bridge has stood since the 14th century, watched by millions of tourists who cross it without fear of collapse. Now imagine, for a moment, if Venice were located in India. Every single one of those canal bridges would have been torn down and rebuilt at least three times by now, each reconstruction giving birth to a fresh scam. The buildings beside the Grand Canal would have been bulldozed for a “central vista” project. The gondolas would have been outsourced to a crony contractor who would deliver fibreglass tubs that sink. Venice, as a living city, would not have survived even a single term of our municipal governance. Yet here, after every rainstorm, we drag its name into our mess as a punchline. We never bother to learn what actually happens in Venice during acqua alta—the high tides that flood St. Mark’s Square. The Venetians have elevated walkways, real‑time tide alerts, and a billion‑euro flood barrier system called MOSE. They don’t post WhatsApp forwards saying “Venice turned into Ghaziabad.” They just get on with resilient, expensive, and publicly‑audited infrastructure—something our elected representatives have no intention of delivering.

“Venice, if it were in India, would have its canals encroached, its bridges auctioned, and its name used to shield incompetence. It survives because it was built before our breed of contractors was born.”

The Propaganda of Paris: How Our Cities Were Sold a Dream They Never Bought

The pre‑election stump speech is a genre of its own. Every neta, from municipal corporator to Prime Minister, promises that your city will soon rival Paris. Beautiful footpaths, gleaming metro stations, world‑class sewerage. The reality, however, is a Paris that exists only in PowerPoints submitted to the Smart City Mission. According to a 2022 CAG audit, of the 100 cities chosen under the Smart City Mission, barely 45% of the funds had been utilised by the extended deadline, and even completed projects often existed only on dashboards. The Parisian dream quickly curdles when the first monsoon hits. The smart poles become electrocution hazards. The command‑and‑control centres turn into rooms where officials watch live feeds of citizens wading through chest‑deep water, helpless. Yet the same politicians who inaugurated those smart poles stand for re‑election, and the same voters who dodged potholes on the way to the booth press the button again. It is a cycle so perfect that the corruption‑industrial complex has no reason to break it.

The Missing Link and Other Monuments to Corruption

Take the Mumbai‑Pune “missing link” project—a crucial expressway segment meant to reduce travel time between two of India’s economic powerhouses. The design came from Canada. The cables were sourced from Malaysia. Cable testing was done in Austria. Wind tunnel tests in Denmark. Nations lent their expertise, and Indian contractors executed the work. The result? A single monsoon was enough to trigger a landslide on the tunnel, leak water like a sieve, and shut down the link. As reported in The Indian Express, the very first heavy rain of 2023 caused a landslip and water seepage that betrayed the international collaboration. When you assemble a multinational engineering dream and it fails like a mud house, the problem is not materials—it is what happens between the sanction letter and the cement mixer. Bribes, substandard inputs, and the complete absence of accountability. This is not an aberration. It is the template for every flyover, every subway, every revived riverfront project. We import technology from the best, and then sprinkle a generous dose of Indian jugaad—which, in official parlance, means cutting costs by making kickbacks invisible.

Mumbai’s Silent Drowning: The Arrogance of Not Comparing

There is one peculiar, and almost admirable, trait about Mumbai during the monsoon. The city that drowns year after year, that loses lives to open manholes, that watches its lifeline local trains stop for hours—this city never compares itself to Venice or Ghaziabad. It does not joke about becoming Atlantis. Mumbai, in its waterlogged arrogance, refuses to be lumped with other drowning cities. Maybe it’s the self‑image of a maximum city that believes its water is somehow different, more tragic, more cinematic. Or maybe it’s a survival tactic: if you don’t compare, you don’t have to demand. The city simply goes silent, endures, and then waits for the next season. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, one of the richest urban bodies in Asia, collects thousands of crores in property tax yet cannot ensure that a receding tide doesn’t turn a street into a swimming pool. And the citizenry, trained by decades of this routine, has internalised that silence is the price of living in the dream metropolis.

This silence is a political gift to the administration. When the people stop making noise, the scandal becomes ambient. No one holds a press conference to ask why the Mithi river, after so many clean‑up drives, still overflows. No one questions why a new coastal road is built on reclaimed land while the existing drainage collapses. The city’s elite complain only about the resale value of their sea‑facing flats, not about the slums that get washed away. So, the monsoon becomes an event to be filmed, not fought. That is the real tragedy: not water on the roads, but a people who have stopped expecting dry roads.

Data Table: The Smart City Scam – Promises vs. Reality

Sources: CAG Report No. 6 of 2022; Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs portals (as of March 2023)
Parameter Promise / Vision Reality
Number of cities 100 Smart Cities with world‑class infrastructure by 2023 Mission extended multiple times; only 5,924 projects completed of 7,934 planned, many only on paper.
Budget utilisation Rs 2,05,018 crore total outlay, fully utilised with impact Actual expenditure around 45% of funds; significant sums parked in bank accounts earning interest.
Storm water drainage 24x7 storm water pumping, zero waterlogging In 2022 and 2023, almost all Smart Cities faced severe waterlogging; no city had functional integrated drainage.
Iconic infrastructure Landmark bridges, smart roads, command centres Multiple bridge collapses (e.g., Mumbai‑Pune missing link, flyovers in Varanasi, FOB in Mumbai); command centres mainly used for photo ops.
Citizen participation Active citizen engagement through digital platforms App‑based complaints often auto‑closed without resolution; no real grievance redressal mechanism.

The Media’s Role: How Venice Became a Comedic Crutch

A significant part of the problem lies in the newsrooms. Every monsoon, television channels rush to find the most viral visuals of waterlogged streets and then anchor their packages with a smirk: “Ghaziabad is now Venice!” This is not clever; it is a betrayal of journalism. Calling a toxic, sewage‑laced pool of water “Venice” trivialises the misery of those who have to wade through it to reach a hospital, an exam hall, or a daily wage job. It reduces a systemic failure to a comedy reel. Venice is a city that has fought for its survival against water with architecture, science, and civic will. Our cities drown because of a complete absence of the same. The media, instead of exposing the nexus between corrupt contractors and municipal engineers, chooses to play with words. It is easier to do a cutaway to a guy rowing a makeshift boat and laugh than to ask the mayor why the drain cleaning budget vanished. The news anchors who perform this ritual are not just lazy; they are co‑conspirators in normalising a disaster.

Public Complicity: The Voters Who Forgive Everything

And then, there is us. The people who wake up to a flooded living room, curse for five minutes, and then upload a video with a laughing emoji. The same people who will, months later, vote for the very same municipal councillor because he “got the street lights fixed”—never mind that the street lights were installed only after the previous ones were stolen. The power of the vote is immense, and in India, it is consistently misused. We have normalised potholes, waterlogging, and collapsing infrastructure as acts of nature, not acts of criminal negligence. We have accepted that every monsoon will bring the same photographs, the same struggles, the same promises. By doing so, we have given a lifetime licence to the corrupt system. The leaders know that roads will wash away, and people will still reach the polling booth through knee‑deep water—the indelible ink will mark their fingers even if their shoes are ruined. There is a certain sadomasochism in this relationship. As long as the water recedes eventually, the forgiveness is immediate. And so, the cycle perpetuates, more vicious with every monsoon.

The River at Your Doorstep: A Dark Gift of the Rain

Perhaps the only honest thing the monsoon does is bring the river to your doorstep. We have systematically murdered our rivers—encroached, filled with trash, turned into drains. The monsoon, in its own way, forces us to remember that a river once flowed here. The water that accumulates on the road is a distilled sample of the river we buried under concrete. So the next time you see a “river” outside your gate, don’t call it Venice. Call it the ghost of the river we killed. Let it remind you that you paid taxes for a city that respects neither water nor its citizens. Stand in that puddle and feel what a river must have felt before we choked it. Maybe then you’ll find the anger to ask a difficult question. Or maybe you’ll just book a cab, pull up your trousers, and walk on—because that’s what smart city dwellers do.

Direct Criticisms

  • To the Prime Minister and your government: You promised “Acche Din” and delivered only acche potholes. Your Smart City Mission was a smart scheme to funnel public money into private hands. Every collapsed bridge is a personal indictment of your administration’s corruption.
  • To the Union Urban Development Ministry: Your dashboards are filled with photoshopped before‑after images, not real drainage. You celebrate token projects while millions wade through filth. Stop calling it a mission when it’s a racket.
  • To the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and every municipal commissioner: You collect some of the highest property taxes in the country. Your silence during the floods is a confession. You are not helpless; you are complicit in trading lives for contracts.
  • To the media anchors who use the “Venice of Ghaziabad” line: You are insulting a World Heritage city and trivialising human suffering. Your metaphors mask the rot. Do your job—investigate the tendering process, not the whimsical comparisons.
  • To the voters of India: You have become so used to broken roads that you share memes while your neighbour loses a home. You re‑elect the same corrupt netas because they gave you a few freebies. Your vote is a weapon you keep handing to the people who hurt you. Stop complaining and start voting for accountability, not for a waterlogged selfie.
  • To the contractor‑politician nexus: You have turned infrastructure into a death warrant. Your substandard materials kill people. Yet you walk free because you have perfected the art of the cut‑money. The blood on your hands is now mixed with rainwater.
  • To everyone who thinks Venice is a funny reference: It is a city that built flood barriers., while we couldn’t build a single storm‑water drain. Show some shame. Don’t drag a 1,600‑year‑old city into the sewer we’ve created.

— this much.

The Paradox of Freedom: Why We Fear the Responsibility We Crave

See All Articles


5 Key Takeaways

  • Freedom and responsibility are inseparable; genuine freedom demands full accountability for one's choices.
  • Many people fear responsibility because it involves fear of failure, judgment, and the unknown, leading them to avoid true freedom.
  • In everyday life, people often trade freedom for psychological ease by conforming to hierarchies, relationships, or curated choices.
  • The fear of freedom is rooted in early childhood experiences of dependency and the unconscious preference for familiar safety.
  • Embracing responsibility as the essence of freedom enables personal growth and a meaningful, self-directed life.



The Heavy Burden of Being Free:
Why Freud Believed Most People Fear Real Freedom

A deep exploration of Sigmund Freud's most unsettling insight about human nature


Freedom is almost universally celebrated as one of humanity’s highest ideals. Revolutions have been waged, borders redrawn, and lives sacrificed in its name. Yet the pioneering psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud offered a provocative twist that still challenges our deepest assumptions.

“People do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility and most people are frightened of responsibility.”

— Sigmund Freud

In a single sentence, Freud captured a paradox that runs silently through modern life. The liberty we claim to desire comes with a hidden cost, and that cost—full accountability for our choices—can be so daunting that many quietly retreat from the very freedom they say they want.

Freud’s words are not a dismissal of the human spirit. Instead, they are a lens that reveals an uncomfortable truth about how our minds work. Understanding this truth can change the way we see our own decisions, our anxieties, and the invisible chains we often choose to wear.

◆ ◆ ◆

Who Was Sigmund Freud?

To appreciate the weight of the quote, it helps to understand the man who spoke it. Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) was the founding father of psychoanalysis, a method for treating mental illness and a theory of the mind that reshaped how we think about human behaviour. He was one of the first to argue that much of our mental life operates beneath the surface of consciousness. Desires, fears, and memories that we are not actively aware of, he insisted, drive a great deal of what we do, feel, and believe.

Freud often used the metaphor of an iceberg to describe the mind. Only a small fraction, he said, is visible above the waterline. The vast bulk—the unconscious—lies hidden beneath, shaping our actions in ways we rarely recognise. In that submerged territory dwells a great deal of unease. People are not purely logical decision-makers. Their choices are coloured by inner conflicts, unspoken terrors, and a deep-seated need for emotional safety. The quote about freedom and responsibility grows directly from this vision of human nature.

What the Quote Says in Simple Terms

Freud’s statement cuts through the romanticism that often surrounds the concept of freedom. In simple language, he is saying that being free is not just about having options. It means being the author of your own life and then owning every sentence you write. If you choose your career, you must accept the risk of failure. If you choose your partner, you must navigate the consequences of that bond. If you choose a path, there is no one else to blame when things go wrong. That ultimate accountability is a heavy load. According to Freud, many people find that load so frightening that they would rather not pick it up at all.

In other words, the fantasy of freedom is attractive. The lived reality of freedom—where every success and every failure rests squarely on your shoulders—is something else entirely. It is easier to let others decide, to follow a prescribed script, or to surrender to external authority. Doing so relieves the pressure of having to justify your own existence to yourself.

The Inseparable Link Between Freedom and Responsibility

Freedom and responsibility are two sides of the same coin. You cannot have one without the other, no matter how much you might wish to untangle them. Every genuine choice introduces a measure of uncertainty. You may weigh the options, consult others, and gather information, but in the end, the decision is yours. And once made, the ripple effects belong to you as well.

This inseparability is what makes freedom a psychologically demanding state. Imagine a young person choosing a field of study. The opportunity is liberating. Yet the decision carries the weight of future consequences—financial, emotional, and social. If the path leads to disappointment, the young person must absorb the full emotional impact. There is no guarantee. That absence of certainty is the very texture of freedom, and it can feel terrifying.

When the result of a free choice is unfavourable, the instinct to deflect blame can be powerful. But true freedom strips away the excuses. It demands that you stand in the centre of your life and say, “I made this happen.” For many, that demand is simply too great.

Why Responsibility Feels So Frightening

Responsibility requires mental work. It asks you to think ahead, to anticipate outcomes, and to tolerate the ambiguity of not knowing how things will unfold. Beneath that daily effort lies a deeper set of psychological fears that Freud spent his career exploring.

First: The Fear of Failure

In a state of freedom, failure is intensely personal. It cannot be outsourced. When a project collapses under your leadership, there is no higher power to absorb the blow. That prospect can paralyse decision-making and make people cling to situations where someone else bears the risk.

Second: The Fear of Judgment

Human beings are social creatures, and the gaze of others carries immense weight. Freely chosen actions open the door to criticism. If you conform to established norms, you can blend in. If you chart your own course, you stand out, and that visibility can feel like a threat.

Third: The Fear of the Unknown

The unconscious mind, Freud argued, is not a rational calculator. It is a repository of anxieties, many of which have roots in early life experiences. Confronted with open-ended freedom, the unconscious often floods consciousness with warning signals. It prefers known suffering to uncertain liberation. The familiar cage feels safer than the open sky.

These fears do not operate in full view. They hum beneath the surface, shaping behaviour through avoidance, procrastination, and a quiet preference for being led. People may genuinely believe they want freedom, but when the moment arrives to seize it, they hesitate. That hesitation, Freud would say, reveals the deeper truth.

Freedom in Everyday Life

Although Freud’s quote can sound abstract, it becomes remarkably concrete when you examine daily routines. Consider your professional life. A job that offers strict instructions and clear hierarchies removes much of the weight of decision-making. For many, that is a relief. Being told what to do eliminates the exhausting process of constant self-direction. The hidden exchange is simple: trade a portion of your freedom for a measure of psychological ease.

The same pattern appears in relationships. A partner who makes all the plans, manages the finances, and decides the social calendar may be resented, but they also provide a structure that absolves the other person of responsibility. The illusion of freedom remains, but the actual burden of choice has been transferred.

Even consumer behaviour reflects this dynamic. Brands and algorithms now curate what we see, buy, and read. The abundance of options can feel overwhelming, and many people welcome a narrowing of choices. It is a subtle surrender of freedom in exchange for cognitive relief.

Every one of these examples underscores Freud’s point. The friction is not in wanting freedom; the friction is in bearing the responsibility that genuine freedom imposes. The human mind has developed countless strategies to escape that weight while preserving the comforting belief that we are still in charge.

The Psychological Perspective

Freud’s clinical work convinced him that people often sabotage their own conscious wishes. A patient might profess a desire for independence while unconsciously clinging to dependent relationships. A capable professional might repeatedly undermine their own advancement. These patterns are not accidental. They serve a hidden purpose: to keep the terrifying expanse of full responsibility at bay.

From a psychoanalytic viewpoint, the fear of freedom is rooted in early experiences of helplessness. As children, we are utterly dependent on caregivers. That dependency leaves lasting imprints. The unconscious remembers that being taken care of means safety. In adulthood, freedom requires giving up that fantasy of a protective overseer. It demands you become your own guardian. The transition is never complete, and many adults retain a quiet longing for someone else to carry the load.

Freud also understood that the unconscious operates on a principle of pleasure and avoidance of pain. Responsibility is rarely pleasurable in the short term. It often involves delayed gratification, the endurance of frustration, and the acceptance of limits. The unconscious, seeking immediate relief, may push an individual toward arrangements that minimise responsibility. The result is a life that feels less free than the person’s words would suggest they want.

Social and Cultural Relevance

Freud’s insight extends beyond the individual and into the fabric of society. Civilisation itself is built on a delicate balance between individual liberty and collective order. Laws, norms, and institutions provide a framework that restricts certain freedoms in order to protect broader ones. This arrangement works because it also reduces the psychological burden of unlimited possibility. Social structures offer scripts: get an education, secure a job, raise a family. These scripts are a form of pre-packaged responsibility. They lighten the load of having to invent a life from scratch.

However, the tension never fully disappears. In times of upheaval, people often gravitate toward strong authorities who promise to simplify choices and shoulder the weight of decision-making. The appeal of such figures is not purely ideological; it is psychological. Surrendering freedom to a leader or a movement can feel like a release from the exhausting duty of self-governance. Freud’s framework helps explain why freedom can be voluntarily traded away even when no one holds a weapon to a person’s head.

Culturally, the quote also speaks to the modern condition of “choice overload.” With unprecedented freedom in careers, lifestyles, and identities, many people report feeling more anxious rather than more liberated. The sheer number of options turns responsibility into a source of chronic stress. The paradox is clear: increased formal freedom does not automatically translate into increased well-being if the corresponding capacity to handle responsibility has not grown as well.

How the Quote Applies Across Different Situations

Professional settings are a living laboratory for Freud’s observation. Organisations often promote individuals to positions of greater autonomy. Some thrive, but others instinctively recoil. They may miss deadlines, avoid crucial decisions, or keep returning to a supervisor for constant approval. The new freedom is technically theirs, but internally they are seeking to offload the responsibility it carries. The diagnosis, in Freudian terms, is not laziness but a deep-seated reluctance to inhabit full accountability.

In personal development, the same dynamic appears when people repeatedly choose the same types of unsatisfying relationships or stay in routines they claim to dislike. The familiarity of a limiting situation provides a perverse kind of security. Stepping into a more expansive life would mean accepting that from now on, the quality of that life is their own doing. That is a sobering thought, and many retreat from it.

Even in the realm of public discourse, one can see a fear of responsibility masquerading as a demand for freedom. People may loudly assert their right to speak or act as they please, yet bristle when asked to own the consequences—be they legal, social, or relational. True freedom of expression is not merely the absence of censorship; it is the willingness to stand by one’s words and accept the fallout. The gap between claiming freedom and living it responsibly is where Freud’s maxim cuts most sharply.

◆ ◆ ◆

Famous Words from Freud That Echo the Same Theme

Freud’s quote on freedom and responsibility does not stand alone. Many of his most memorable lines explore the hidden forces that govern human life. Here are a few that deepen the picture:

“The mind is like an iceberg, it floats with one-seventh of its bulk above water.”

On the unconscious mind

This reminder that most mental activity is unconscious reinforces why we often do not fully understand our own resistance to freedom. The real drivers of behaviour lie out of sight.

“Being entirely honest with oneself is a good exercise.”

On self-awareness

Self-honesty is a prerequisite for bearing responsibility. Without it, freedom is just an illusion built on self-deception.

“Unexpressed emotions will never die. They are buried alive and will come forth later in uglier ways.”

On suppressed feeling

Avoiding the emotional weight that accompanies responsible action does not make it vanish. Suppressed anxieties about freedom eventually surface, often as blame, resentment, or paralysis.

“Words have a magical power. They can either bring the greatest happiness or the deepest despair.”

On language and commitment

Language is the tool through which we articulate commitments. The words we use to claim freedom also bind us to the expectations those words create.

“Dreams are often most profound when they seem the most crazy.”

On the unconscious revealed

Dreams, in Freud’s view, offer a window into unconscious wishes and fears. A person who dreams of flying without restraint may simultaneously harbour a terror of falling. Freedom and dread are intimately linked in the psychic depths.

Each of these aphorisms reinforces the central insight: humans are complex creatures whose surface desires do not always tell the full story.

Embracing Responsibility as the True Essence of Freedom

Understanding Freud’s perspective is not an invitation to cynicism. It is an invitation to growth. Recognising that fear of responsibility is natural strips away the shame of feeling it. The courageous step is to face that fear directly rather than organise your life around avoiding it.

True freedom becomes valuable not when it offers comfort, but when it demands accountability, self-awareness, and conscious decision-making. The individual who owns both success and failure moves beyond a passive existence. They stop waiting for permission and start authoring their days. This does not mean freedom becomes easy. It means the difficulty is acknowledged and accepted as the price of a genuine, self-directed life.

In practical terms, building the capacity to handle responsibility is a gradual process. It starts with small choices where you resist the urge to defer. It grows through honest reflection on moments when you blamed circumstances rather than your own actions. It develops when you sit with the discomfort of uncertainty without immediately seeking someone else to resolve it. Over time, the fear loses its grip, and the joy of authentic freedom—the kind that feels earned—begins to emerge.

Society, too, can foster this maturity. Educational systems that encourage critical thinking and personal accountability prepare individuals to bear the weight of liberty. Workplaces that trust employees to manage their own tasks without micromanagement cultivate a healthier relationship with responsibility. Communities that celebrate not only rights but also duties help normalise the equation Freud described.

“Freedom, in the end, is not a gift to be unwrapped and enjoyed without effort. It is a demanding, lifelong companion. It insists that we grow up, take stock, and carry our portion of the world’s weight.”

The heart of Freud’s insight

What We Learn from an Uncomfortable Truth

Sigmund Freud’s observation that people are frightened of responsibility remains startlingly relevant. It explains why individual advancement stalls, why collective freedoms can be surrendered quietly, and why the texture of modern life often feels anxious despite unprecedented material liberty. The quote is not a condemnation of human weakness. It is a diagnosis that liberates by making the invisible visible.

Once we see the dynamic, we can choose differently. We can notice the internal flinch when a free choice presents itself and still move forward. We can catch ourselves constructing excuses and gently dismantle them. We can understand that the heaviness we feel in a moment of true freedom is not a sign that something is wrong. It is the sensation of standing for once on our own ground, with no one else to credit or blame.

Freedom, in the end, is not a gift to be unwrapped and enjoyed without effort. It is a demanding, lifelong companion. It insists that we grow up, take stock, and carry our portion of the world’s weight. Most people, Freud suggested, tremble at that invitation. But for those who accept it, freedom stops being a burden and becomes the very shape of a meaningful life.



Read more