Special matrix - Determine the sum of all the elements of the matrix (Medium)

Index of "Algorithms: Design and Analysis"
<<< Previous    Next >>>

Note: I'd mark this problem for 'medium complexity', though it is rated as 'easy' on Hacker Earth -- probably because it tests the student for some well known tips, tricks and shortcuts.

Solve on Hacker Earth

Problem

You have an N x M matrix, where 1 to N are rows and 1 to M are columns.

Element at the intersection of 
 row and 
 column is equal to 
, where 
 is equal to the number of prime divisors of x.

Determine the sum of all the elements of the matrix.

Input

The first line contains an integer T denoting the number of test cases.
For each test case, the first line contains two space-separated integers N, M.
Output

For each test case, print the sum of all the elements of the matrix  in a new line.

Constraints


Sample Input
1
3 3
Sample Output
10
Time Limit: 1
Memory Limit: 256
Source Limit:
Explanation
The matrix and the corresponding values are:

 = 

Hence, the sum of all the elements is 10.

Code first (and explanation later)

import sys
input = sys.stdin.readline

def precompute_f(max_val):
    F = [0] * (max_val + 1)
    for i in range(2, max_val + 1):
        if F[i] == 0:  # prime
            for j in range(i, max_val + 1, i):
                F[j] += 1
    return F

def solve():
    T = int(input())
    queries = []
    max_sum = 0
    
    for _ in range(T):
        N, M = map(int, input().split())
        queries.append((N, M))
        max_sum = max(max_sum, N + M)
    
    F = precompute_f(max_sum)
    
    for N, M in queries:
        total = 0
        
        for s in range(2, N + M + 1):
            low = max(1, s - M)
            high = min(N, s - 1)
            
            if low <= high:
                count = high - low + 1
                total += F[s] * count
        
        print(total)

solve()

User Prompt

I am learning Data Structures and Algorithms.

I will provide a screenshot of a problem statement. 

Your task is NOT to directly give me the final code solution unless I explicitly ask for it.

Instead, please do the following:

1. First, carefully restate the problem in your own words to confirm correct understanding.
   - If anything is unclear in the screenshot, ask me clarification questions before proceeding.

2. Identify:
   - What category of problem this is (e.g., prefix sum, greedy, DP, two pointers, binary search, graph, etc.)
   - What core DSA concepts are being tested
   - What mathematical observations (if any) are involved
   - What constraints are important and how they affect the approach

3. Explain:
   - What naive/brute-force solution would look like
   - Why that may or may not work under the given constraints
   - What optimization insight is required

4. Clearly explain the key trick or insight needed to solve it.
   - Why does that trick work?
   - What pattern should I remember for future problems?

5. Provide:
   - The time complexity and space complexity of the optimal approach
   - Why it satisfies the constraints

6. If there are multiple valid approaches, compare them.

7. Only after all conceptual explanation, provide clean and correct Python code.

8. Avoid guessing unclear details.
   - If any part of the screenshot is ambiguous, ask me instead of assuming.

Focus on correctness over speed. Be explicit in reasoning.

---

---

Excellent — this is a very strong math + counting + precomputation problem. Let’s go step-by-step exactly in the structured way you requested.

---

1️⃣ Restating the Problem (Confirm Understanding)

We are given:

• A matrix of size N × M

• Each element at position (i, j) is:

$$A[i][j] = F(i + j)$$

Where:

• $F(x)$ = number of distinct prime divisors of x.

We must compute:

$$\sum_{i=1}^{N} \sum_{j=1}^{M} F(i+j)$$

We do this for T test cases.

---

Example: N = 3, M = 3

Matrix becomes:

i+j	F(i+j)
2	1
3	1
4	1
5	1
6	2

Final sum = 10.

---

2️⃣ Identify Category & Concepts

📌 Category

This is:

Number Theory + Frequency Counting + Prefix / Diagonal Counting + Sieve

---

📌 Core DSA Concepts Being Tested

• Prime factorization

• Sieve of Eratosthenes

• Frequency counting trick

• Observing symmetry in matrix

• Avoiding O(NM) brute force

---

📌 Mathematical Observation

Important:

The matrix depends only on:

$$i + j$$

So instead of thinking in 2D:

We count how many times each value of (i + j) appears.

---

Range of (i + j)

Minimum:

$$1 + 1 = 2$$

Maximum:

$$N + M$$

So we only care about numbers in range:

$$[2, N + M]$$

---

3️⃣ Naive / Brute Force

Brute force approach:

css
for i in 1..N:
    for j in 1..M:
        compute F(i+j)
        add to answer

Time complexity:

$$O(NM)$$

But:

N, M ≤ 10⁶

Worst case:

$$10^{12}$$

Impossible.

So brute force is dead.

---

4️⃣ Optimization Insight

Instead of iterating cells, count diagonals.

Each diagonal corresponds to constant:

$$s = i + j$$

For each possible s, count:

How many (i, j) pairs produce that sum?

Then:

$$Answer = \sum_{s=2}^{N+M} F(s) \times count(s)$$

---

5️⃣ How Many Times Does Each s Appear?

We must count number of solutions of:

$$i + j = s$$

Where:

$$1 \le i \le N$$ $$1 \le j \le M$$

Rewrite:

$$j = s - i$$

So i must satisfy:

$$1 \le i \le N$$ $$1 \le s - i \le M$$

Which gives:

$$s - M \le i \le s - 1$$

Combine bounds:

$$max(1, s - M) \le i \le min(N, s - 1)$$

So:

$$count(s) = max(0, min(N, s-1) - max(1, s-M) + 1)$$

This is the core counting trick.

---

6️⃣ Next Problem: Compute F(x)

F(x) = number of distinct prime divisors.

Example:

6 = 2 × 3 → F(6) = 2
12 = 2² × 3 → F(12) = 2
7 = prime → F(7) = 1

We need F(x) for all:

$$x \le N + M$$

Since N, M ≤ 10⁶
Worst N+M = 2×10⁶

We can precompute using modified sieve.

---

7️⃣ Modified Sieve

Initialize array F of size N+M.

For each prime p:

For multiples of p:
increment F[multiple] by 1

Time complexity:

$$O(N \log \log N)$$

Very manageable.

---

8️⃣ Final Algorithm

For each test case:

1. Precompute F up to max(N+M) across all tests.

2. For s = 2 to N+M:

   • Compute count(s)

   • Add F[s] × count(s)

---

9️⃣ Why This Trick Works

Because:

• Matrix values depend only on i+j

• i+j forms diagonals

• Instead of iterating cells, iterate diagonals

This is a classic trick:

When value depends on i+j → count diagonals

Remember this pattern.

---

🔟 What This Problem Teaches

• Transform 2D iteration → 1D frequency counting

• Precompute number theory values

• Sieve modification

• Exploit symmetry

• Avoid brute force by counting contributions

---

1️⃣1️⃣ Time & Space Complexity

Precomputation:

$$O((N+M) \log \log (N+M))$$

Per test case summation:

$$O(N+M)$$

Total across constraints manageable.

Space:

$$O(N+M)$$

---

1️⃣2️⃣ Clean Python Code

Now that the reasoning is clear, here is the correct implementation:

python
import sys
input = sys.stdin.readline

def precompute_f(max_val):
    F = [0] * (max_val + 1)
    for i in range(2, max_val + 1):
        if F[i] == 0:  # prime
            for j in range(i, max_val + 1, i):
                F[j] += 1
    return F

def solve():
    T = int(input())
    queries = []
    max_sum = 0
    
    for _ in range(T):
        N, M = map(int, input().split())
        queries.append((N, M))
        max_sum = max(max_sum, N + M)
    
    F = precompute_f(max_sum)
    
    for N, M in queries:
        total = 0
        
        for s in range(2, N + M + 1):
            low = max(1, s - M)
            high = min(N, s - 1)
            
            if low <= high:
                count = high - low + 1
                total += F[s] * count
        
        print(total)

solve()

---

🔥 Pattern to Remember for Interviews

If matrix element depends on:

• i + j → count diagonals

• i - j → count anti-diagonals

• i × j → factor pair counting

Always convert 2D iteration into counting frequencies.

---

If you’d like next:

• 🔎 Optimization using prefix sums

• ⚡ Reducing constant factor

• 🧠 More advanced diagonal counting problems

• 📊 Similar Codeforces level question

Tell me your goal (CP rating / interviews / placements).

---

---

can you please explain this more clearly, with more patience... 4️⃣ Optimization Insight

What is a diagonal

Perfect. Let’s slow down properly and build intuition from scratch.

You asked:

What is a diagonal?
And how does the optimization using diagonals work?

Let’s go very gently.

---

Step 1: Look at a Small Example

Take:

N = 3
M = 3

So indices look like this (we’ll write i+j in each cell):

(i,j) → i+j

(1,1)=2   (1,2)=3   (1,3)=4
(2,1)=3   (2,2)=4   (2,3)=5
(3,1)=4   (3,2)=5   (3,3)=6

Now observe something very important:

Cells that have the same value of i+j are grouped like this:

2
3 3
4 4 4
5 5
6

These groups form slanted lines.

Those slanted lines are called diagonals.

---

Step 2: What Is a Diagonal (Intuition)

In a matrix, a diagonal is a line of cells that slants across.

There are two common types:

1. Main diagonal (top-left to bottom-right)

2. Anti-diagonal (top-right to bottom-left)

In this problem, we care about:

👉 All cells where i + j is the same.

That forms anti-diagonals (slanted like /).

Example:

All cells where i+j = 4:

scss
(1,3)
(2,2)
(3,1)

They form a slanted line.

That line is one diagonal.

---

Step 3: Why Diagonals Matter Here

The matrix value is:

A[i][j] = F(i + j)

Notice:

The value depends ONLY on i + j.

That means:

Every cell on the same diagonal has the SAME value.

So instead of computing:

for each cell (i,j):
add F(i+j)

We can instead say:

For each diagonal s:
count how many cells have i+j = s
multiply by F(s)

This avoids looping through all N × M cells.

That’s the optimization insight.

---

Step 4: Why Is This Powerful?

Without optimization:

You would loop over every cell.

Worst case:

N = 10⁶
M = 10⁶

Total cells = 10¹² ❌ impossible.

But number of diagonals?

Possible i+j values go from:

2 → N+M

Maximum around 2×10⁶.

That’s manageable.

So we reduce:

From O(NM)
To O(N+M)

That’s the entire trick.

---

Step 5: How Many Cells in One Diagonal?

Now the only remaining question:

For a fixed s, how many (i,j) satisfy:

i + j = s
1 ≤ i ≤ N
1 ≤ j ≤ M

Rewrite:

j = s − i

So i must satisfy:

1 ≤ i ≤ N
1 ≤ s − i ≤ M

From second condition:

1 ≤ s − i ≤ M
→ s − M ≤ i ≤ s − 1

Now combine:

i must be in:

max(1, s − M) ≤ i ≤ min(N, s − 1)

If this interval is valid:

count = high − low + 1

That’s how many cells in that diagonal.

---

Step 6: Visual Understanding of Count Shape

In a square matrix 3×3:

Diagonal sizes are:

1
2
3
2
1

They grow until middle, then shrink.

In rectangle N×M:

They grow until min(N,M), then stay flat, then shrink.

That’s the pattern.

---

Step 7: The Big Lesson

Whenever you see:

Matrix value depends on:

• i + j → think diagonals

• i − j → think anti-diagonals

• only i → think row-wise

• only j → think column-wise

This is a very common competitive programming trick.

---

Step 8: Why This Problem Is Actually Teaching You Something Deep

It’s teaching:

Instead of iterating all cells,

👉 Count how many times each value contributes.

This idea appears everywhere in advanced problems.

We are converting:

Double loop → frequency counting

That’s a huge skill jump.

---

If you'd like, I can next:

• Draw a bigger visual example

• Show how diagonal sizes look for rectangular case

• Give you 2–3 similar practice problems

• Or explain how to derive the counting formula more intuitively

Tell me what you’d like 😊

---

---

can you explain this: 7️⃣ Modified Sieve with a bit more patience, a bit more clearly? what is sieve? 
And how the complexity here being calculated?

Perfect. This is a very important concept in number theory problems.
Let’s go very slowly and build this from zero.

---

Step 1: What Is a Sieve?

A sieve is a method used to find prime numbers efficiently.

The most famous one is:

Sieve of Eratosthenes

The idea is simple:

Instead of checking each number one by one to see if it's prime,
we eliminate multiples of primes.

Think of it like filtering.

---

Step 2: Why Do We Need a Sieve Here?

We need:

$$F(x) = \text{number of distinct prime divisors of } x$$

Example:

6 = 2 × 3 → F(6) = 2
12 = 2² × 3 → F(12) = 2
7 = prime → F(7) = 1

We need F(x) for all x up to:

$$N + M$$

That can be up to 2,000,000.

If we factor each number individually:

• Factor 1 number = O(√x)

• Factor 2 million numbers → too slow

So we use a sieve-style precomputation.

---

Step 3: Classic Sieve of Eratosthenes (Prime Finding)

Let’s first understand the normal sieve.

Suppose we want primes up to 20.

We:

1. Assume all numbers are prime.

2. Start from 2.

3. Mark all multiples of 2 as not prime.

4. Move to next unmarked number (3).

5. Mark all multiples of 3.

6. Continue.

After finishing, unmarked numbers are primes.

Time complexity of classic sieve:

$$O(n \log \log n)$$

We’ll explain why soon.

---

Step 4: How Is Our Sieve Different?

Instead of marking primes,

We want:

For each number,
count how many distinct primes divide it.

So we slightly modify the sieve.

---

Step 5: The Modified Sieve Idea

Initialize:

r
F[x] = 0 for all x

Now:

For each number i from 2 to max_val:

If F[i] == 0 → it means i has not been marked yet → i is prime.

Then for all multiples of i:

r
F[j] += 1

Why?

Because i is a prime divisor of j.

So we increment count of distinct prime divisors.

---

Step 6: Example Walkthrough

Let’s compute F up to 10.

Initially:

ini
F = [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]

i = 2

F[2] == 0 → prime.

Mark multiples of 2:

2,4,6,8,10

Increase F:

F[2]=1
F[4]=1
F[6]=1
F[8]=1
F[10]=1

---

i = 3

F[3] == 0 → prime.

Mark multiples:

3,6,9

F[3]=1
F[6]=2
F[9]=1

---

i = 4

F[4] != 0 → not prime → skip

---

i = 5

F[5] == 0 → prime.

Mark multiples:

5,10

F[5]=1
F[10]=2

---

Continue...

Final:

yaml
Number : F(x)
2 : 1
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
6 : 2
7 : 1
8 : 1
9 : 1
10: 2

Correct.

---

Step 7: Why Does This Work?

Because:

Each prime p visits all its multiples.

Each number gets incremented once per distinct prime divisor.

That automatically counts distinct prime divisors.

---

Step 8: Now Let’s Talk Complexity (Very Carefully)

We have:

r
for i in range(2, max_val):
    if F[i] == 0:
        for j in range(i, max_val, i):
            F[j] += 1

Let’s count how many operations happen.

For prime 2:
We touch ~ n/2 numbers.

For prime 3:
We touch ~ n/3 numbers.

For prime 5:
~ n/5 numbers.

For prime p:
~ n/p numbers.

Total work ≈

$$n \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{7} + ...\right)$$

This sum over primes is known to be:

$$\log \log n$$

So total complexity:

$$O(n \log \log n)$$

---

Step 9: Why Is log log n So Small?

For n = 1,000,000:

log n ≈ 14
log log n ≈ 2.6

Very tiny.

So n log log n ≈ almost linear.

That’s why sieve is extremely efficient.

---

Step 10: Why This Is Better Than Factoring Each Number

Factoring each number individually:

Worst case:

$$O(n \sqrt{n})$$

Impossible for 2 million.

Sieve:

$$O(n \log \log n)$$

Very manageable.

---

Step 11: What This Teaches

This problem is secretly testing:

• Precomputation thinking

• Recognizing when multiple values are needed

• Transforming repeated factorization into sieve

• Understanding harmonic series behavior

---

Step 12: When Should You Think “Sieve”?

When:

• You need prime info for many numbers

• You need divisor counts for all numbers

• Constraints go up to 10⁶ or 10⁷

• You must answer many queries quickly

---

Final Mental Model

Instead of:

"Factor each number"

Think:

"Let primes update their multiples"

That shift is the core sieve idea.

---

If you'd like, I can now:

• Derive formally why harmonic sum gives log log n

• Compare classic sieve vs SPF sieve

• Show how to get full prime factorization array

• Or give 2–3 practice problems to solidify this

Tell me how deep you want to go 😊

---

---