Jobs for the Connected? Haryana's Legal Appointments Spark Controversy
Imagine a government job that pays well and holds significant power. Now imagine that job going to someone facing serious charges, or someone whose only qualification seems to be their family name. That's exactly what's stirring up a storm in Haryana.
Recently, the Haryana government appointed 97 new legal advisors – people who represent the state in court and guide its legal decisions. One name on that list immediately raised eyebrows: Vikas Barala, son of a prominent BJP Rajya Sabha MP. Barala is currently out on bail and facing trial in a high-profile stalking and attempted abduction case.
But an investigation by The Indian Express revealed a startling fact: it's not just Barala. At least 23 of these 97 new appointees have direct links to powerful politicians, senior government officials (IAS/IPS), or even judges. We're talking about sons, daughters, and close relatives of VIPs filling these crucial roles.
This isn't just a minor issue. These are important positions, with some earning up to Rs 1.8 lakh per month, tasked with defending the state's interests. Back in 2016, India's Supreme Court actually warned against such appointments, stressing that these jobs should be given based on merit and ability, not political favors or personal connections. The court even urged states like Haryana to create transparent selection processes. Haryana did pass a law in 2016 to ensure this, but it seems the spirit of that law is being ignored.
Haryana's top lawyer, the Advocate General, insists all appointees are competent and earned their spots on merit, not their surnames. Some new appointees also claim they've been practicing law for decades. However, the sheer number of 'VIP' connections raises serious questions about fairness and transparency.
The most poignant reaction came from Varnika Kundu, the woman who accused Vikas Barala of stalking and attempted abduction. In a powerful social media post, she expressed her disappointment, stating that while she still believes in the judiciary, her "faith has wavered" when seeing such appointments.
This situation highlights a critical concern: are important government jobs going to the most qualified, or just the best connected? When public positions appear to be handed out based on who you know, rather than what you know, it erodes public trust and undermines the very principles of good governance. It's a reminder that citizens deserve transparency and accountability in how their governments operate and who they choose to represent them.
No comments:
Post a Comment