Decision Tree (Using Gini Impurity) - With Video and Interview Questions

To See All ML Articles: Index of Machine Learning

Interview Questions
Inspired from the video.

Q1: Have you worked with a Decision Tree?

Q2: Can you name some Tree based Machine Learning models?

Tree-based machine learning models are a class of models that use decision trees as the primary building blocks for making predictions. Here are some common tree-based models:
Decision Trees: These are the simplest form of tree-based models, where each internal node represents a test on an attribute, each branch represents the outcome of the test, and each leaf node represents a class label or regression value.
Random Forest: An ensemble method that builds multiple decision trees and merges their results to improve accuracy and control overfitting.
Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM): An ensemble technique that builds trees sequentially, where each new tree corrects the errors of the previous ones.
XGBoost: An optimized version of gradient boosting that includes features like tree pruning, parallel processing, and handling missing values.
LightGBM: A gradient boosting framework that uses a histogram-based learning algorithm, designed for high performance and efficiency.
CatBoost: A gradient boosting library that handles categorical features automatically and is known for its ease of use and accuracy.
Extra Trees (Extremely Randomized Trees): Similar to random forests but with a random selection of split points, which increases variance reduction through randomization.
Histogram-based Gradient Boosting: A variant of gradient boosting that uses histograms to speed up the learning process by discretizing continuous features.
These models are widely used in various applications, including classification and regression tasks, and are popular for their ability to capture complex patterns and interactions in the data.

Q3: How about Isolation Forest?

Isolation Forest is a tree-based machine learning algorithm specifically designed for anomaly detection. Here’s a bit more about it:
Isolation Forest
Purpose: The Isolation Forest algorithm is used to identify anomalies or outliers in a dataset. It is particularly useful when you need to detect rare events or unusual observations.
Mechanism: Unlike other tree-based models that focus on accurate prediction of a target variable, Isolation Forest works by isolating anomalies. It constructs decision trees by randomly selecting a feature and then randomly selecting a split value between the minimum and maximum values of that feature.
Isolation Path: The primary idea is that anomalies are "few and different," meaning that they are more likely to be isolated closer to the root of the tree, while normal observations require more splits to be isolated. The path length from the root to a leaf node (the depth of isolation) is shorter for anomalies.
Ensemble Method: Like Random Forests, Isolation Forest is an ensemble method that builds multiple trees and combines their results. The average path length from the root to the leaf across all trees is used to determine the anomaly score of an observation.
Efficiency: Isolation Forest is computationally efficient and can handle high-dimensional datasets effectively, making it suitable for large-scale anomaly detection tasks.
Key Characteristics
No Assumptions About Data Distribution: Isolation Forest does not assume any specific data distribution, which makes it versatile in detecting anomalies in various types of data.
Scalability: It scales well to large datasets and is faster than many other anomaly detection techniques.
Interpretability: The concept of isolating anomalies based on path lengths provides an intuitive understanding of why certain observations are considered outliers.
Isolation Forest is widely used in applications such as fraud detection, network intrusion detection, and other areas where identifying rare and unusual events is critical.

Q4: Decision Tree is parametric or non-parametric?

Non-parameteric

Q5: What are the differences between parametric learning models and non-parametric learning models?

Parametric and non-parametric learning models are two broad categories of machine learning models, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Here's a detailed comparison of the two:
Parametric Learning Models
Definition: Parametric models are those that summarize data with a set of parameters of fixed size, regardless of the number of training examples.
Characteristics:
Fixed Number of Parameters: The model has a predetermined number of parameters, which do not increase with the size of the training dataset.
Assumptions About Data: These models often assume a specific form for the underlying data distribution (e.g., linear, Gaussian).
Simpler and Faster: They are generally easier to understand and faster to train because they have a fixed, often smaller, set of parameters.
Less Flexible: Due to the assumptions made, they may not capture complex patterns in the data as well as non-parametric models.
Examples:
Linear Regression
Logistic Regression
Naive Bayes
Support Vector Machines (with a fixed kernel)
Neural Networks (with a fixed architecture)
Advantages:
Efficient with small data sets
Easier to interpret
Faster computation due to fewer parameters
Disadvantages:
Limited flexibility and capacity to model complex data
Performance may degrade with wrong assumptions about data distribution
Non-Parametric Learning Models
Definition: Non-parametric models are those that do not assume a fixed form for the model. The complexity of the model grows with the data.
Characteristics:
Flexible Structure: The number of parameters can grow with the size of the dataset, allowing the model to become more complex as more data is added.
No Strong Assumptions: They make fewer assumptions about the data distribution, allowing them to model complex patterns more effectively.
Require More Data: These models typically require a larger amount of data to make accurate predictions.
Examples:
Decision Trees
k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN)
Support Vector Machines (with a non-linear kernel)
Random Forests
Kernel Density Estimation
Advantages:
High flexibility and ability to model complex data patterns
Better performance on large datasets with complex relationships
Disadvantages:
Can be computationally expensive with large datasets
Risk of overfitting, especially with small datasets
Harder to interpret
Summary
Parametric models are more suitable when you have a small dataset and a well-understood problem where the assumptions about data distribution hold true. They provide simpler and faster solutions but might not capture complex relationships well.
Non-parametric models are preferable when dealing with large datasets and complex data patterns, where making fewer assumptions about the data is advantageous. They offer greater flexibility at the cost of increased computational requirements and potential overfitting.
Choosing between parametric and non-parametric models often depends on the specific characteristics of the data and the problem being solved.

Q6: kMeans is parametric or non-parametric?

k-Means is generally considered a parametric clustering algorithm. Here's why:
Characteristics of k-Means as a Parametric Model
Fixed Number of Parameters: The primary parameter in k-Means is the number of clusters, $k$, which is specified before the algorithm is run. This makes the model's complexity fixed regardless of the size of the dataset.
Centroids as Parameters: The model is characterized by the centroids of the clusters, which are the parameters that define the clusters.
Assumptions: k-Means makes specific assumptions about the data, such as that the clusters are spherical and have similar sizes. This can be seen as a kind of parametric assumption about the data structure.
Not Adaptive: The number of clusters, $k$, does not change with more data, unlike non-parametric models where model complexity can grow with the data.
Comparison with Non-Parametric Models
Non-Parametric Models: These models, like hierarchical clustering or DBSCAN, do not require a predefined number of clusters and can adapt their complexity as more data is available.
k-Means: Since it requires the number of clusters to be specified a priori and relies on a fixed set of parameters (centroids), it aligns more closely with parametric models.
Conclusion
While k-Means is more flexible than some traditional parametric models because it doesn't assume a distributional form of the data, its reliance on a fixed parameter ($k$) and a fixed number of centroids places it in the parametric category. However, it's worth noting that in the context of clustering, the distinction between parametric and non-parametric is not always as clear-cut as it is in supervised learning tasks.

Q7: Why is kNN nonparametric?

The k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) algorithm is considered a non-parametric model for several reasons:
Characteristics of k-NN as a Non-Parametric Model
No Fixed Number of Parameters: k-NN does not involve training a model with a fixed set of parameters. Instead, it relies on the entire training dataset to make predictions, and the model's complexity can grow with the size of the dataset.
No Assumptions About Data Distribution: Unlike parametric models, k-NN does not make assumptions about the underlying distribution of the data. It operates purely based on the proximity of data points in the feature space.
Model Complexity: The complexity of the k-NN model is directly related to the amount of data available. As more data is added, the model's ability to learn from complex patterns increases, which is a key characteristic of non-parametric models.
Instance-Based Learning: k-NN is an instance-based or lazy learning algorithm, meaning it does not explicitly learn a model or parameters during training. Instead, it memorizes the training data and makes predictions based on the closest examples in the dataset.
Adaptive Capacity: The decision boundary in k-NN can be very complex and adapts to the data. It is capable of forming intricate shapes in the feature space as it directly considers the data points around a query point.
Advantages of Being Non-Parametric
Flexibility: k-NN can model complex decision boundaries without the need for predefined assumptions about the data structure.
Simple and Intuitive: The algorithm is straightforward and easy to implement, as it only involves calculating distances between data points.
Disadvantages
Computational Cost: Since k-NN uses the entire training dataset to make predictions, it can be computationally expensive, especially with large datasets.
Sensitivity to Noise: k-NN can be sensitive to noise in the data and the choice of the distance metric, which can affect its performance.
In summary, k-NN is non-parametric because it does not involve a fixed set of parameters and can grow in complexity with the data, making it adaptable to various data distributions and capable of capturing intricate patterns.

Q8: What are the differences between Supervised Learning Algorithms and Unsupervised Learning Algorithms?

Q9: What is pruning? And what it's advantages and disadvantages?

Pruning is a technique used in decision tree algorithms to reduce the size of a tree by removing parts that are not necessary for classifying instances. The primary goal of pruning is to improve the model's generalization to unseen data by reducing overfitting, which occurs when a model learns noise and details from the training data that do not generalize to new data.
Types of Pruning
Pre-Pruning (Early Stopping):
Definition: Stops the growth of the tree early by setting conditions for halting the splitting process. Conditions can include a maximum depth, a minimum number of samples required to split a node, or a minimum impurity decrease.
Advantages: Reduces computational cost and complexity of the tree.
Disadvantages: May halt growth too early, leading to underfitting if the stopping criteria are too strict.
Post-Pruning (Pruning After Training):
Definition: First grows a full tree and then removes nodes that provide little predictive power. This can be done by evaluating the effect of removing a node and its descendants on the model’s performance.
Methods:
Cost Complexity Pruning: Uses a penalty term based on the size of the tree and the error rate.
Reduced Error Pruning: Removes nodes if the tree’s accuracy on a validation set does not decrease after removal.
Advantages of Pruning
Reduces Overfitting: By removing nodes that do not contribute significantly to model performance, pruning helps in generalizing the model better to unseen data.
Simplifies the Model: Pruning results in a smaller, more interpretable model, making it easier to understand and visualize.
Improves Performance: Pruned trees can be faster to evaluate and often perform better on new data due to reduced complexity.
Efficient Use of Resources: Reducing the size of the tree means less memory and computational resources are required during inference.
Disadvantages of Pruning
Risk of Underfitting: If pruning is too aggressive, important nodes might be removed, leading to a model that is too simplistic and unable to capture important patterns in the data.
Dependence on Pruning Criteria: The effectiveness of pruning depends heavily on the criteria and methods used, which can be challenging to tune correctly.
Potential Loss of Information: Pruning involves the removal of nodes, which may occasionally result in the loss of subtle, yet significant patterns.
Complexity in Implementation: Implementing post-pruning techniques can be complex, requiring careful selection of parameters and evaluation metrics.
Summary
Pruning is a valuable technique for enhancing decision trees by balancing complexity and performance. When applied correctly, it can lead to models that are both efficient and accurate, although careful consideration of the pruning strategy is necessary to avoid underfitting and ensure optimal results.

Q10: What is information gain?

Information gain is a concept from information theory used to measure the effectiveness of an attribute in classifying data. It is a key criterion used in decision tree algorithms like ID3, C4.5, and others to select the best attribute for splitting the data at each node of the tree.
Key Concepts
Entropy:
Entropy is a measure of the uncertainty or impurity in a dataset. It quantifies the amount of randomness or disorder in the data.
For a binary classification problem, the entropy $H$ of a dataset $D$ is defined as:
$$H(D) = -p_+ \log_2(p_+) - p_- \log_2(p_-)$$
where $p_+$ is the proportion of positive examples and $p_-$ is the proportion of negative examples in the dataset.
Information Gain:
Information gain measures the reduction in entropy or uncertainty about the target variable after partitioning the data based on an attribute.
It quantifies how well a given attribute separates the data into classes.
The information gain $IG$ for an attribute $A$ with respect to dataset $D$ is calculated as:
$$IG(D, A) = H(D) - \sum_{v \in \text{Values}(A)} \frac{|D_v|}{|D|} H(D_v)$$
where:
$\text{Values}(A)$ are the possible values of attribute $A$.
$D_v$ is the subset of $D$ where attribute $A$ has value $v$.
$\frac{|D_v|}{|D|}$ is the proportion of the dataset that falls into subset $D_v$.
Example
Consider a dataset of weather conditions with the target variable "Play Tennis" (Yes or No). Suppose we have an attribute "Outlook" with possible values "Sunny," "Overcast," and "Rain." To calculate the information gain of "Outlook," we would:
Calculate the entropy of the entire dataset.
Calculate the entropy of each subset created by splitting on "Outlook."
Compute the weighted average of these entropies.
Subtract the weighted entropy from the original entropy to get the information gain.
Importance in Decision Trees
Attribute Selection: In decision trees, information gain is used to choose the attribute that provides the highest information gain (i.e., the most informative attribute) for splitting the data at each node. This helps in building a tree that is efficient and accurate.
Decision Making: By selecting attributes that maximize information gain, decision trees can create a structure that minimizes uncertainty at each level, leading to clearer decision paths.
Advantages and Limitations
Advantages:
Provides a clear metric for attribute selection.
Helps in constructing efficient decision trees.
Limitations:
Can be biased towards attributes with more levels or unique values (a problem addressed by using gain ratio in algorithms like C4.5).
Requires calculating probabilities, which may be computationally expensive for large datasets with many attributes.
In summary, information gain is a crucial concept for constructing decision trees, helping to select the best attributes for splitting and thus contributing to the model's accuracy and interpretability.

Q11: Compare Information gain and Gini gain?

Information gain and Gini impurity are both metrics used to evaluate the quality of a split in decision trees, but they are derived from different theoretical bases and have slightly different interpretations. Here's how they compare and how information gain is calculated with respect to Gini impurity:
Information Gain
Definition: Information gain is based on the concept of entropy, which measures the amount of uncertainty or impurity in a dataset. It quantifies the reduction in entropy after splitting a dataset based on an attribute.
Calculation Using Entropy:
Entropy of Dataset $D$:
$$H(D) = -\sum_{i=1}^{c} p_i \log_2(p_i)$$
where $p_i$ is the proportion of class $i$ in the dataset, and $c$ is the number of classes.
Information Gain for Attribute $A$:
$$IG(D, A) = H(D) - \sum_{v \in \text{Values}(A)} \frac{|D_v|}{|D|} H(D_v)$$
where $D_v$ is the subset of $D$ where attribute $A$ has value $v$.
Gini Impurity
Definition: Gini impurity is another measure of impurity or disorder within a dataset, often used in classification trees like CART (Classification and Regression Trees). It represents the probability of incorrectly classifying a randomly chosen element if it was randomly labeled according to the distribution of labels in the dataset.
Calculation:
Gini Impurity of Dataset $D$:
$$G(D) = 1 - \sum_{i=1}^{c} p_i^2$$
where $p_i$ is the proportion of class $i$ in the dataset.
Gini Impurity for Attribute $A$:
$$\Delta G(D, A) = G(D) - \sum_{v \in \text{Values}(A)} \frac{|D_v|}{|D|} G(D_v)$$
Information Gain with Respect to Gini Impurity
While information gain is traditionally calculated using entropy, a similar concept can be applied using Gini impurity to assess the quality of a split:
Gini Gain: This is analogous to information gain but uses Gini impurity instead of entropy:
$$GG(D, A) = G(D) - \sum_{v \in \text{Values}(A)} \frac{|D_v|}{|D|} G(D_v)$$
Comparison of Entropy and Gini Impurity
Entropy vs. Gini:
Both metrics aim to find the best attribute to split the data by reducing impurity.
Entropy uses a logarithmic function to measure impurity, whereas Gini impurity uses a quadratic function.
Gini impurity tends to favor splits that maximize class purity more aggressively than entropy, leading to faster convergence in practice.
Computational Efficiency: Gini impurity is often preferred in practice because it is slightly easier to compute than entropy, especially in large datasets.
Bias Towards Many Classes: Entropy is more sensitive to changes in class probabilities and can be biased towards attributes with more classes (a problem sometimes mitigated by using the gain ratio).
Conclusion
While information gain and Gini impurity are derived from different principles, they serve a similar purpose in decision tree algorithms: to evaluate and select the most informative splits in the data. Each metric has its advantages and can be chosen based on the specific characteristics of the problem and dataset.

Q12: What is range of Gini impurity?

The range of Gini impurity is from 0 to 0.5. This measure is used to quantify the impurity or disorder within a dataset, especially in the context of decision trees.
Explanation
Gini Impurity Formula:
$$G(D) = 1 - \sum_{i=1}^{c} p_i^2$$
where $p_i$ is the proportion of observations belonging to class $i$ in the dataset, and $c$ is the total number of classes.
Range:
0: The Gini impurity is 0 when all instances in the dataset belong to a single class. In this case, there is no uncertainty or impurity in the dataset, as it is perfectly pure.
0.5: The Gini impurity reaches its maximum value when the classes are uniformly distributed. In a binary classification problem, this occurs when $p_1 = p_2 = 0.5$. For multiple classes, the impurity is highest when all classes have equal probability, leading to a more balanced distribution.
Examples
Pure Dataset: Consider a dataset where all instances belong to one class, say all positive (100% positive, 0% negative):
$$G = 1 - (1^2 + 0^2) = 0$$
Balanced Binary Dataset: In a binary dataset with 50% positive and 50% negative instances:
$$G = 1 - (0.5^2 + 0.5^2) = 1 - (0.25 + 0.25) = 0.5$$
Multi-Class Dataset: For a dataset with three classes, each having equal proportions ($p_1 = p_2 = p_3 = \frac{1}{3}$):
$$G = 1 - \left(\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^2\right) = 1 - \left(\frac{1}{9} + \frac{1}{9} + \frac{1}{9}\right) = 1 - \frac{1}{3} = 0.6667$$
Here, the maximum Gini impurity exceeds 0.5 because there are more than two classes, and the distribution is perfectly balanced.
Interpretation
Gini Impurity Near 0: Indicates high purity, with most instances concentrated in a single class.
Gini Impurity Near 0.5 (or more for multi-class): Indicates high impurity, with instances more evenly distributed among the classes.
In summary, the Gini impurity provides a measure of the "impurity" or "diversity" of a dataset, with values closer to 0 indicating a purer dataset, and values closer to 0.5 (or higher for multi-class) indicating a more mixed or diverse dataset.

Note: Maximum Value that Gini Impurity can take is 0.5 for dataset with two classes (true-false, positive-negative, 0-1, yes-no). And this maximum value increases to 0.667 when number of classes becomes 3 as shown above.

Q13: What limitations of a Decision Tree does Random Forest model overcome?

Random Forest is an ensemble learning method that addresses several limitations of individual decision trees. Here's a detailed look at how Random Forest overcomes these limitations:
Limitations of Decision Trees and How Random Forest Overcomes Them
Overfitting:
Decision Trees: A single decision tree can easily overfit the training data, especially if it is allowed to grow very deep without constraints. This results in a model that captures noise along with the actual data patterns, leading to poor generalization on unseen data.
Random Forest: By constructing a large number of decision trees and aggregating their predictions, Random Forest reduces the risk of overfitting. Each tree in the forest is trained on a different subset of the data (using bootstrapping) and a random subset of features, which helps in capturing diverse patterns without relying too heavily on specific data points.
High Variance:
Decision Trees: They are sensitive to variations in the training data. Small changes in the dataset can lead to a completely different tree structure, making them unstable.
Random Forest: Aggregating predictions from multiple trees stabilizes the model and reduces variance. The ensemble method averages out the errors from individual trees, resulting in a more robust model.
Bias in Feature Selection:
Decision Trees: They can be biased towards features with more levels or unique values when selecting the best split, often leading to less informative splits.
Random Forest: By using random subsets of features for each split (feature bagging), Random Forest reduces the bias toward any particular feature, promoting a more balanced consideration of features.
Complexity and Interpretability:
Decision Trees: A deep decision tree can become complex and difficult to interpret. While Random Forest models are inherently more complex and less interpretable as they involve many trees, the trade-off is that they provide more accurate predictions.
Random Forest: While the ensemble model is complex, it can provide feature importance scores that offer insights into which features are most influential in the predictions, aiding interpretability to some extent.
Sensitivity to Noise:
Decision Trees: A single decision tree can be quite sensitive to noise in the data, capturing these fluctuations as part of the decision rules.
Random Forest: By averaging over many trees, the impact of noisy data is minimized. This helps in making more stable and accurate predictions.
Lack of Robustness:
Decision Trees: They can be fragile in the presence of outliers or mislabelled data.
Random Forest: Due to the ensemble approach, Random Forest is more robust against outliers and errors in the dataset, as individual anomalies are less likely to influence the overall model.
Summary
Random Forest enhances the performance and reliability of decision trees by utilizing an ensemble approach. This technique leverages multiple trees to improve accuracy, robustness, and generalization, making it a powerful model for many practical applications. The randomness in data and feature selection ensures diversity among the trees, leading to a more balanced and comprehensive model.

Q14: What is Feature bagging?

Feature bagging, also known as feature randomization or random subspace method, is a technique used to improve the performance of machine learning models, particularly ensemble methods like Random Forests. It involves selecting a random subset of features for each individual model or tree in an ensemble. Here’s a detailed explanation of feature bagging:
Key Concepts of Feature Bagging
Random Subsets of Features:
Instead of using all features for splitting nodes in decision trees, feature bagging randomly selects a subset of features at each split.
This process introduces diversity among the trees in an ensemble by ensuring that each tree is trained on different features, which helps in reducing overfitting and improving generalization.
Combination with Bagging:
Feature bagging is often used in combination with bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating), where each tree in the ensemble is trained on a different random subset of the training data (with replacement).
The combination of feature bagging and bagging creates a more robust and diverse ensemble, as it reduces both variance and bias.
Implementation in Random Forest:
In Random Forest, feature bagging is a core component. For each decision tree, a random subset of features is selected at each node to determine the best split.
This method ensures that the trees in the forest do not become too similar to each other and are therefore less prone to overfitting.
Advantages of Feature Bagging
Reduces Overfitting:
By limiting the features available for splitting at each node, feature bagging helps prevent any single feature from dominating the splits, which reduces overfitting to the training data.
Increases Model Diversity:
Different subsets of features lead to different decision trees, increasing the diversity among the trees in the ensemble. This diversity is crucial for the ensemble method’s performance, as it allows the combination of various perspectives on the data.
Improves Generalization:
The aggregation of predictions from trees built on different feature subsets improves the generalization of the model to unseen data, as the model captures a wider range of patterns.
Mitigates Bias:
By using a random subset of features, feature bagging helps to mitigate bias associated with certain features that may otherwise have a disproportionate influence on the model.
Disadvantages of Feature Bagging
Increased Complexity:
Feature bagging increases the complexity of the model by introducing randomness in feature selection, which can make the model more challenging to interpret.
Computational Cost:
Training multiple trees with different subsets of features can be computationally expensive, especially with large datasets and many features.
Summary
Feature bagging is a powerful technique used to enhance the performance of ensemble methods like Random Forests by introducing randomness in the feature selection process. This helps in reducing overfitting, increasing model diversity, and improving generalization, ultimately leading to more robust and accurate models.

Tags: Technology,Machine Learning,Classification,

Getting the Geometric Intuition Behind Logistic Regression

To See All ML Articles: Index of Machine Learning

One of the first things to know about Logistic Regression is that:
• It is a Linear Model.

That means output of this model depends on the linear combination of it's features.

Having said that:

As a first step, let's create a linear combination of the features of the dataset with features :

$\beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \ldots + \beta_n x_n = 0$

where $\beta_0$ is the intercept, and $\beta_1, \beta_2, \ldots, \beta_n$ are the coefficients of the features $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$.

Geometric Intuition

This equation of linear combination of features resembles the equation of a plane.

The equation of a plane in three-dimensional space is a linear equation that represents all the points $(x, y, z)$ that lie on the plane. The general form of the equation of a plane is:

$$ax + by + cz = d$$

Formula for Distance from a Point to a Plane

For a point $P(x_0, y_0, z_0)$, the distance $D$ from the point to the plane is given by:

$$D = \frac{|ax_0 + by_0 + cz_0 - d|}{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2}}$$


Second thing to remember about Logistic Regression is that:
• It is a Binary classification model.

But how does that matter?

Being a linear model: we can say that decision boundary for Logistic Regression would be line in 2D, plane in 3D and hyperplane in nD.

Being a binary classification model: we can say that points will lie on either side of the decision boundary.

This means that distance of a point on the decision boundary will have the following expression set to 0:

$$D = \frac{|ax_0 + by_0 + cz_0 - d|}{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2}}$$

So: D = 0 for points on the decision boundary.

Equivalently, we can say:

$$***$$

Or For Our Logistic Regression Model:

$\beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \ldots + \beta_n x_n = 0$

So the way to decide the class of a point is:

$\beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \ldots + \beta_n x_n = 0$

If this Beta expression > 0: point lies above the plane (on the one side of the plane)
And if this expression < 0: point lies below the plane (on the other side of the plane)

Logistic (or Sigmoid) Comes Into Picture

Now, statisticians knew that the range of $\beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \ldots + \beta_n x_n = 0$ $y \in (-\infty, \infty)$

To convert the Beta expression into a range of Probability and to also follow the properties of a Probability, we can pass it through a Logistic (or Sigmoid) expression:

Logistic function is:

$$\sigma(x) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-x}}$$

For Logistic Regression, we write:

$$\sigma(x) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-\left(\beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \cdots + \beta_n x_n\right)}}$$


Very Important Point :: This expression: $\sigma (\mathbf{<b>\beta </b>},\mathbf{<b>x</b>})$ is the probability that data point in consideration lies in class Y=1.

Bonus Video:

Logistic Regression Indepth Intuition - Part 1



Logistic Regression Indepth Intuition - Part 2

Tags: Technology,Machine Learning,Mathematical Foundations for Data Science,

Questions on: If __name__ == '__main__' ( A Python Lesson )

To See All Python Articles: Python Course (Index)

Question 1: Which of these is not a module?

A. libraries
B. functions
C. classes
D. files
E. None of the above.


Answer:

All of these are modules: libraries, functions, classes and files.
Correct answer: E

~~~

Question 2: 

What will this print:


import pandas
df = pandas.DataFrame([1, 2])
print(__name__)


~~~

Q3:

What will this print:


import pandas
df = pandas.DataFrame([1, 2])
print(pandas.__name__)


~~~

Q4:

What will this print:


import pandas as pd
df = pandas.DataFrame([1, 2])
print(pd.__name__)


Q5:

What will this print:


from pandas import DataFrame
print(DataFrame.__name__)


Q6: What will this print:

from pandas import DataFrame
print(pandas.__name__)


Answer: NameError: name 'pandas' is not defined


Rules of Thumb

For libraries:
Remove the .py filename extension to get the __name__ of any library.

For Classes and Functions:

The __name__ is the same as the name of the class.

~~~

Q7: What will this print:


++++ File: import_me.py ++++

def call_me():
    print("Hello!!!")

call_me()

++++ File: run_me.py ++++

from import_me import call_me

call_me()
print(5+5) 

Output:


Hello!!!
Hello!!!
10

~~~


Ratings


    
Harshitha
4

Tags: Python,Technology,

The Musk, The Monk, And the Circle of Control.

So this is coming directly from my pen…
I've been reading a couple of books recently that have sparked some deep reflections on life, ambition, and presence. Among these books are Elon Musk by Walter Isaacson, When Things Fall Apart by Pema Chodron, and The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen Covey. Each of these works offers unique insights into different ways of approaching life and the challenges it presents.

The reason I'm writing this post is to share my thoughts on how I digested the seemingly opposite and contradictory personalities of Elon Musk and a Buddhist monk. On one hand, we have Elon Musk, a visionary entrepreneur with boundless thoughts and ambitions. He's constantly thinking about "what's coming next," pushing the boundaries of technology and innovation. Musk is someone who thrives on challenges and disruption, perpetually in pursuit of a future that's bigger and brighter than the present.

On the other hand, there are Buddhist monks, as described by Pema Chodron, who focus on living in the present moment. They embrace the "here and now," finding peace and contentment in the simple act of being. For them, the journey inward is as significant as any outward achievement, if not more so. Their practice emphasizes mindfulness, acceptance, and letting go of the need to control everything around them.

These contrasting approaches to life got me thinking about Stephen Covey's concept of the "Circle of Control," which I find deeply relevant to both Musk's and the monk's philosophies. Covey's idea is that we should focus our energy on things within our control, rather than worrying about what's beyond our reach. This concept forms the foundation of personal effectiveness, enabling us to manage stress and maintain a sense of balance in our lives. 
[See the notes from Stephen Covey's book below]

Musk's relentless drive embodies a certain mastery over his Circle of Control. He leverages his skills, resources, and influence to effect change and create groundbreaking innovations. However, his approach can sometimes lead to stress and burnout, as it involves constant striving and little room for pause.

In contrast, the Buddhist monk operates from a place of acceptance and surrender. By focusing on what they can control—namely, their thoughts and reactions—they find peace amidst chaos. This doesn't mean they are passive; rather, they choose to engage with the world from a place of calm and clarity.

What I've realized through these readings is the importance of balancing these perspectives. We can learn from Musk's visionary thinking and relentless pursuit of goals, while also embracing the monk's practice of mindfulness and presence. By understanding and navigating our own Circle of Control, we can harness the best of both worlds—driving toward our dreams while remaining grounded in the present moment.

In conclusion, the key lies in finding harmony between ambition and mindfulness. By integrating the lessons from Elon Musk, Pema Chodron, and Stephen Covey, we can cultivate a life that's both fulfilling and centered. Let's embrace the challenges ahead with clarity and intention, as we navigate the dynamic dance between the future and the now.

Notes from Stephen Covey's book

CIRCLE OF CONCERN/CIRCLE OF INFLUENCE

Another excellent way to become more self-aware regarding our own degree of proactivity is to look at where we focus our time and energy. We each have a wide range of concerns---our health, our children, problems at work, the national debt, nuclear war. We could separate those from things in which we have no particular mental or emotional involvement by creating a "Circle of Concern."



As we look at those things within our Circle of Concern, it becomes apparent that there are some things over which we have no real control and others that we can do something about. We could identify those concerns in the latter group by circumscribing them within a smaller Circle of Influence.

By determining which of these two circles is the focus of most of our time and energy, we can discover much about the degree of our proactivity.






Proactive people focus their efforts in the Circle of Influence. They work on the things they can do something about. The nature of their energy is positive, enlarging and magnifying, causing their Circle of Influence to increase.

For both Elon Musk and Pema Chodron, there circle of concern and circle of influece is in proportion with each other.

Tags: Book Summary,Buddhism,Behavioral Science,Management,