Solve on HackerEarth Test Cases
Problem
Given an array
of
integers. Find the number of unordered pairs
,
such that
`
is odd where
represents bitwise XOR operation.
Input format
The first line contains three space-separated integers
.
The next line contains
space-separated integers denoting the array
Output format
Print the number of unordered pairs
which satisfy the above conditions in a new line.
Constraints
1 ≤ N ≤ 10^5
Sample Input
4 2 10
1 2 3 4
Sample Output
4
Time Limit: 1
Memory Limit: 256
Source Limit:
Explanation
Following unordered pairs satisfy the above conditions:
Key Learnings on Paper
My Code
N, L, R = tuple(map(int, input().split()))
A = list(map(int, input().split()))
odd_num = []
even_num = []
for i in A:
if i % 2 == 0:
even_num.append(i)
else:
odd_num.append(i)
from bisect import bisect_left, bisect_right
even_num.sort()
ans = 0
for o in odd_num:
left = bisect_left(even_num, L-o)
right = bisect_right(even_num, R-o)
ans += (right - left)
print(ans)
Help I Took From ChatGPT
Explain the second required condition in this coding puzzle
Let’s focus only on the second condition, explain it in plain language, and build intuition step by step.
๐น The second condition (from the problem)
A[i] ⊕ A[j]is odd, where ⊕ means bitwise XOR
๐น What does “XOR” mean? (very simply)
XOR compares two numbers bit by bit:
-
0 ⊕ 0 = 0 -
1 ⊕ 1 = 0 -
0 ⊕ 1 = 1 -
1 ⊕ 0 = 1
So:
-
Bits that are different → 1
-
Bits that are same → 0
๐น What makes a number odd?
A number is odd if its last bit (LSB) is 1.
Example:
-
5 = 101→ odd -
6 = 110→ even
So for:
๐ the last bit of the XOR must be 1
๐ Crucial Insight (this is the whole trick)
The last bit of A[i] ⊕ A[j] depends only on the last bits of A[i] and A[j].
Let’s check all possibilities:
| A[i] | A[j] | Last bit of A[i] | Last bit of A[j] | XOR last bit | Odd? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| even | even | 0 | 0 | 0 | ❌ |
| odd | odd | 1 | 1 | 0 | ❌ |
| even | odd | 0 | 1 | 1 | ✅ |
| odd | even | 1 | 0 | 1 | ✅ |
✅ Conclusion (VERY IMPORTANT)
A[i] ⊕ A[j]is odd if and only if one number is even and the other is odd.
That’s it.
No need to compute XOR explicitly.
๐น What the condition really means (in plain English)
The problem is secretly saying:
“Only count pairs where one element is odd and the other is even.”
๐งช Example from the sample
Array
| Pair | Values | Odd/Even | XOR | Odd? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1,2) | 1,2 | odd, even | 3 | ✅ |
| (1,3) | 1,3 | odd, odd | 2 | ❌ |
| (1,4) | 1,4 | odd, even | 5 | ✅ |
| (2,3) | 2,3 | even, odd | 1 | ✅ |
| (2,4) | 2,4 | even, even | 6 | ❌ |
| (3,4) | 3,4 | odd, even | 7 | ✅ |
Exactly the pairs listed in the explanation.
๐ง Why problem setters love this condition
Because:
-
It sounds complicated
-
But reduces to a simple parity check
-
It tests whether you understand bitwise logic
๐ One-line takeaway
The XOR of two numbers is odd if and only if they have opposite parity (one odd, one even).
If you want next, I can:
-
Show how this simplifies the full solution
-
Combine this with the sum condition efficiently
-
Write the optimized algorithm
-
Explain why brute force fails
Just tell me ๐
yes, write the complete code and explain in layman terms
Great ๐
Let’s do this step by step, in very simple language, and then I’ll give you the complete working code.
๐ Problem recap (in plain English)
You are given:
-
An array
AofNnumbers -
Two numbers
LandR
You must count how many unordered pairs (i, j) (with i < j) satisfy both conditions:
✅ Condition 1: Sum condition
✅ Condition 2: XOR condition
๐ง Key observations (the tricks)
๐ Trick 1: Understanding the XOR condition
As we discussed earlier:
A[i] ⊕ A[j]is odd
if and only if one number is odd and the other is even
So:
-
Ignore XOR completely
-
Just ensure one odd + one even
๐ Trick 2: Split the array
Separate the array into:
-
odds→ all odd numbers -
evens→ all even numbers
Now:
-
We only form pairs between
oddsandevens -
Never odd–odd or even–even
๐ Trick 3: Efficiently count valid sums
For each odd number:
-
Count how many even numbers form a valid sum in
[L, R]
To do this fast:
-
Sort the
evenslist -
For each
odd, find:-
how many
evenvalues satisfy:
-
-
Use binary search to count that range
⚙️ Why this is fast
-
Sorting:
O(N log N) -
Each search:
O(log N) -
Total:
O(N log N)→ works forN ≤ 10⁵
✅ Complete Python Code
๐งช Example walk-through
Input
Step 1: Split
Step 2: Check pairs
| Odd | Even | Sum | Valid? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ✅ |
| 1 | 4 | 5 | ✅ |
| 3 | 2 | 5 | ✅ |
| 3 | 4 | 7 | ✅ |
Answer = 4
๐ง One-line intuition
“Count how many odd–even pairs have sums in the required range.”
๐ What this problem teaches you
-
XOR parity trick (odd ↔ different parity)
-
Breaking a hard condition into a simple rule
-
Using binary search to avoid brute force
-
Thinking in terms of pair counting
-
Writing scalable solutions for large input
If you want next, I can:
-
Optimize further
-
Add comments line-by-line
-
Show a brute-force version for comparison
-
Convert this to C++ / Java
Just tell me ๐
is bisect a core python package or I would need to do some setup
Good question — this is an important practical detail ๐
✅ Short answer
bisect is a core Python module.
You do NOT need to install anything.
It comes bundled with Python by default.
๐ฆ What is bisect?
bisect is part of Python’s standard library.
You can safely use:
in:
-
Competitive programming
-
Interviews
-
Online judges (Codeforces, LeetCode, HackerEarth, etc.)
-
Local Python installations
๐ง What bisect does (quick reminder)
It performs binary search on a sorted list.
Example:
So the count of 4 is:
❌ When would you need setup?
Only if:
-
You’re using a very restricted runtime (rare)
-
Or a non-standard Python implementation (also rare)
In 99.9% of cases → no setup needed
๐งช If you want to avoid bisect (optional)
You could implement binary search manually — but that’s not necessary and worse for readability.
✅ Final verdict
✔️ bisect is safe
✔️ No installation required
✔️ Standard, accepted, efficient
You’re good to go ๐
what if the sought out number is not in input array then what does bisect do?
Excellent question — this gets to the heart of what bisect actually does ๐
And the answer is exactly why bisect is perfect for this problem.
๐น Short answer
bisect does NOT search for the element.
It finds the position where the element should be inserted to keep the list sorted.
So it works even if the number is not present.
๐น What does bisect_left do?
๐ Returns the index where x should be inserted so that:
-
the list remains sorted
-
xwould go before any equal elements
๐น What does bisect_right do?
๐ Returns the index where x should be inserted:
-
after any equal elements
๐งช Example 1: Number NOT in array
Why?
So the range [2, 2) contains 0 elements → correct.
๐งช Example 2: Count numbers in a range (THIS is the trick)
Numbers in [5, 9] are:
✔️ Correct
๐น Why this is perfect for our problem
We want:
We compute:
And count:
Even if:
-
loworhighdo NOT exist in the array -
OR the array has no valid values
๐ bisect still gives the correct count
๐ง Mental model (easy to remember)
bisect answers: “Where would this number go?”
Not:
“Is this number present?”
๐น One-line takeaway
bisectworks on positions, not on presence — which is exactly why it’s used for range counting.
If you want, I can:
-
Draw a visual diagram
-
Compare with linear scan
-
Show how wrong code behaves without bisect
-
Explain bisect edge cases
Just tell me ๐



No comments:
Post a Comment