See All Articles

The Day the Bazaar Wept: When Trump Spoke of War and Iran Answered with a Coffin

It was around noon when the news broke. America had declared an end to the ceasefire with Iran. No more talks, Trump announced. The message had barely landed in Mumbai when the market began its freefall. By the end of the day, Sensex had plunged 1,677 points, Nifty 50 shed 516 points, and over 8 lakh crore rupees of investor wealth evaporated into thin air. The immediate trigger? Trump had revoked the temporary waiver that allowed Iran to sell oil, and with that, crude prices started their familiar, violent surge. The world, once again, tumbled into a vortex of economic anxiety.

But away from the bourses, a different kind of procession was underway. On July 4—America’s 250th Independence Day—Iran began the funeral rites of its Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. His body was being moved through city after city, and millions poured onto the streets, not just in Iran but across the border in Iraq, where a national holiday had been declared for July 8. The images coming out of the region were staggering: a sea of mourners, defiant and unafraid, even as American bombs and talk of war filled the airwaves.

The Hangover of a Ceasefire

The Trumpian approach to diplomacy is, at best, a capricious pendulum. One day it is “the deal of the century,” the next it is “no more talk.” On this occasion, the pendulum swung violently, and the Indian market, perpetually drunk on FII inflows and global sentiment, felt the hangover immediately. Consider the numbers:

Index	Point Drop	% Change
BSE Sensex	1,677	-2.8%
Nifty 50	516	-2.9%
Investor Wealth Lost	Over ₹8 lakh crore

Crude oil climbed back above $85 a barrel, as the Strait of Hormuz once again became a geopolitical flashpoint. The American withdrawal of the oil sales waiver was intended to bleed Iran dry. But the Indian economy, so deeply tethered to imported crude, bled alongside it. This is the cost of a foreign policy that has, for years, prioritized photo-ops and strategic alignments over strategic autonomy.

A Funeral That United Enemies

July 9 was to be the day Khamenei would be laid to rest in Mashhad. But the days preceding it rewrote the map of loyalty. Iraq and Iran fought a brutal eight-year war in the 1980s. Hundreds of thousands died. Khamenei, then Iran’s President, was a face of that war. And yet, on his death, millions of Iraqis crossed bridges of memory and pain to carry his coffin on their shoulders. Iraq’s Prime Minister and top officials joined the mourners in Najaf. The commander of the IRGC’s Quds Force, designated a terrorist by the U.S., was seen accompanying the funeral procession on Iraqi soil. The war of the past had been rendered meaningless by a shared grief.

It was exactly on this day that Trump chose to speak of war. The irony is too thick to ignore. A man who thinks he can redraw the map with tariffs and threats failed to read the room. Sometimes, dates consume all the power you think you possess. The millions who walked with the corpse were not running towards bunkers; they were walking towards a shrine, towards history, and in that act, they were telling the superpower: drop your bombs, we are already home.

The Strait of Tensions

Central to the renewed confrontation is the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has never relinquished its claim of authority over the chokepoint, and America’s insistence that tankers need not coordinate with Tehran has become a recipe for perpetual friction. Reports surfaced that Iranian authorities had begun turning back ships through the Omani corridor, instructing them to sail exclusively through Iranian waters. The New York Times reported that Iran and Oman were considering a joint plan to levy tolls on vessels passing through—a voluntary system, initially, with potential concessions for China and friendly nations.

Just a week earlier, Trump had balked at any such proposal, even threatening Oman with consequences. Yet the two countries persisted. America’s revocation of the oil waiver was meant to isolate Iran economically. But Iran, this time, was not sitting with its accounts book open in despair. Instead, missiles were being readied on the very same shoulders that carried the Supreme Leader’s body.

Bombs and Bullets: The Military Dance

Between July 7 and 8, the military tit-for-tat escalated sharply. US Central Command claimed that in response to Iranian attacks on three oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman—two Saudi, one Qatari—American forces struck multiple targets in southern Iran. Over 80 sites were hit: air defense systems, coastal radar installations, fast-attack craft. One Iranian soldier was reported dead.

The very next day, Iran retaliated by targeting American positions in Bahrain and Kuwait. NATO’s chief swiftly endorsed the US action, stating that Iran had been violating the ceasefire and that the strikes were justified. Iran’s Parliament Speaker, Qalibaf, tweeted that the US had violated the Memorandum of Understanding and that the “reality of the Strait of Hormuz cannot be tampered with.” The cycle of threats, bombings, and sanctions had locked itself into a grotesque rhythm.

The Karbala Resonance

To understand the imagery of these days, one must understand the Shiite consciousness. Khamenei’s coffin was not merely a box of bones. It was a re-enactment of Karbala, a grief that is relived every Muharram by millions beating their chests. The martyrdom of Imam Hussain is a narrative that defies geography. When the funeral entered the shrine of Hazrat Ali, it was a moment of profound symbolic condensation. A leader, vilified by the West, was being absorbed into the very legend that has sustained a civilization through centuries of tyranny.

Can you recall any other instance in modern history where the funeral of a nation’s supreme leader was invited, welcomed, and shouldered by millions in a once-enemy country? It hasn’t happened. The popular legitimacy that could not be manufactured by elections was being written in the streets of Basra and Karbala. Netanyahu and Trump, watching from their respective dens, must have seen their own tactical calculus dissolve into that crowd. The more bombs they threatened, the larger the procession grew. The fear was mocked into boredom.

When Markets Tremble, Who Pays?

Back in India, the Sensex graph had turned into a downward dagger. But what about the larger architecture that makes such a crash possible? The Indian government’s relentless pursuit of a strategic embrace with the United States and Israel has led to a situation where energy security is outsourced to American whims. After Trump’s first withdrawal from the JCPOA in 2018, India quietly reduced its Iranian oil imports to zero by 2019, bowing to the threat of secondary sanctions. The Chabahar port project, once a proud counterweight to Gwadar, has been slowed down by the fear of American displeasure.

Now, on July 4, when America celebrated its 250th year of independence with parades and fireworks, India’s market was busy collapsing because a foreign president uttered a few words. The same India that celebrates US Independence Day with curated enthusiasm from Lutyens’ Delhi could not protect its own investors from the whims of that very ally. The Prime Minister’s much-photographed hugs with Trump and the “Howdy Modi” spectacles have yielded no strategic cushion. Instead, they have exposed the economy’s soft underbelly. Every time the American president wakes up on the wrong side of the bed, Indian retail investors are handed a collective loss of 8 lakh crore rupees. This is not sovereignty; it is surrender.

The Hypocrisy of War Merchants

The contrast between the methods of war cannot be starker. Israel, under Netanyahu, has perfected the art of assassination by innovation: pagers that explode, drone strikes on sleeping leaders, missiles that flatten apartment blocks in Gaza, killing the homeless and the unarmed. It is a form of warfare that operates in the shadows of plausible deniability, deriving its power from technology and treachery. Iran, on the other hand, announces its presence. Its missiles are not hidden in pockets. They are launched from the same shoulders that bear coffins. There is a brutal honesty in that—a directness that does not pretend to be anything other than what it is.

Netanyahu, who has spent years lecturing the world about existential threats, must have watched the crowds in Karbala and felt a deep despair. Those millions were not hiding. They were not pleading for a ceasefire. They were walking, and in their walking, they were telling the profiteers of war: you have no monopoly on fear.

Criticisms

• - The Indian government's foreign policy is criticized for sacrificing energy security at the altar of strategic posturing.
• - Economic sovereignty is undermined by an overdependence on volatile global oil markets, a vulnerability left unaddressed by years of missed reforms.
• - The alignment with American and Israeli interests is seen to have failed in protecting domestic markets from the fallout of distant conflicts.
• - The reduction of Iranian oil imports under external pressure is considered a betrayal of long-standing bilateral ties and national interest.
• - The Chabahar port project's stagnation is attributed to a lack of political will in the face of American sanctions, weakening India's connectivity ambitions.
• - The US administration's frequent and sudden reversals on ceasefires and waivers are condemned for destabilizing the global economy and increasing the price of essential commodities for developing nations.
• - The unilateral use of military force without exhausted diplomatic avenues is deplored, particularly when launched on days of significant cultural or religious observance.
• - Israel's tactics of targeted killings and the deployment of explosive devices in civilian spaces are denounced as violations of international humanitarian law.
• - NATO's uncritical endorsement of US strikes is seen as a failure of multilateral institutions to act as honest brokers for peace.
• - Mainstream media's selective outrage is noted for amplifying war rhetoric while neglecting the human cost of sanctions and bombings on ordinary people.
• - The stock market's knee-jerk reactions are considered a symptom of an unregulated financial ecosystem that punishes small investors while speculators profit from geopolitical chaos.

At this moment, the world is suspended between the threat of war and the hope of a peace that nobody seems to know how to build. Trump will continue to mutter about power. Netanyahu will fume in his office. But the images from the streets of Iran and Iraq have already delivered their verdict: the age of fear is over. The bombs may fall, but the coffin will keep moving. America’s 250th Independence Day will be remembered not for the fireworks over the Potomac, but for the processions that taught the world what independence truly looks like.

Operation Hard Ball: When the FBI Does What India’s Police Cannot

See All Articles

Operation Hard Ball: When the FBI Does What India’s Police Cannot

There is a particular kind of silence that engulfs the Indian establishment when an external agency rips open the festering wound of our collapsed policing. That silence — heavy, complicit — was palpable this week after the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, in coordination with law enforcement from Canada and multiple European nations, concluded the first phase of Operation Hard Ball. Across three continents, 24 operatives of three transnational criminal gangs were arrested. Eleven of those arrests happened on American soil. And yet, the gang leaders — Lawrence Bishnoi, Jaggu Bhagwanpuria, and Ravinder Dhand — were not roaming free in some distant safe haven; they were, and are, lodged inside Indian prisons. Prisons run by governments of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

The FBI’s action is not a routine counter‑gang operation. It is, in effect, a global indictment of India’s law‑enforcement machinery, a machinery that has so thoroughly rotted that the job of protecting Indian lives and the security of friendly nations had to be outsourced to Washington, Ottawa, and European capitals. The questions that arise from this operation must travel directly to the desk of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. Because what the FBI has laid bare is not merely a crime story — it is a story of the Indian state’s abdication.

The Architects of Terror from Inside Prison Walls

Three names define this transcontinental network of murder and extortion. Lawrence Bishnoi, lodged in the Sabarmati Central Jail in Gujarat. Jaggu Bhagwanpuria, confined in the Silchar Central Jail of Assam. And Ravinder Dhand, a Canadian national, arrested now in Vancouver. All three belong to gangs that, according to the FBI, operate with the precision of well‑funded corporations — carrying out targeted killings, political assassinations, abductions, and extortion rackets across the United States, Canada, and Europe.

Bishnoi and Bhagwanpuria have not seen a free dawn in years. Yet the FBI affidavit states that Lawrence Bishnoi was continuously supplied with mobile phones and internet devices inside the Sabarmati jail. From his cell, he gave orders for political murders. From his cell, he directed hit jobs, collected protection money, and expanded his empire. Jaggu Bhagwanpuria, the primary accused in the murder of Punjabi singer Sidhu Moosewala, controls—according to the FBI—over 1,000 operatives worldwide. At least a hundred of them are active in the United States alone. The sheer scale mocks every claim of “zero‑tolerance” toward crime that the Indian establishment has made.

This is the map the investigation has drawn:

Gang Leader	Indian Jail (State)	Ruling Party	International Footprint (Reported)	Key Cases Linked
Lawrence Bishnoi	Sabarmati Central Jail, Gujarat	Bharatiya Janata Party	USA, Canada, Europe	Hardeep Singh Nijjar murder (Canada), plot to kill Gurpatwant Singh Pannun (USA)
Jaggu Bhagwanpuria	Silchar Central Jail, Assam	Bharatiya Janata Party	Over 1,000 operatives; 100+ in USA, large network in Europe, UK, Australia, NZ	Sidhu Moosewala murder, extortion rackets in North America
Ravinder Dhand	— (Canadian citizen, arrested in Vancouver)	—	Canada, USA	International drug trafficking, targeted killings

The figure of a thousand operatives is not a typographical error. The FBI’s disclosure is precise: Jaggu Bhagwanpuria’s gang has over a thousand men deployed across continents. When a single incarcerated criminal from Gurdaspur can command a private army larger than the police forces of several Union territories, we are forced to ask: what exactly has the government been doing?

The Pannun-Nijjar Connection: America’s Unforgiving Memory

The arrests under Operation Hard Ball are deeply intertwined with two of the most damaging international scandals that have befallen the Modi government in recent years: the assassination of Canadian Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in British Columbia, and the foiled plot to murder Khalistan separatist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun in New York. The United States is not a country that forgets an attempt on its soil. The FBI’s investigation has now openly linked these gangs to both cases. Moreover, the US has formally sought the custody of Lawrence Bishnoi in connection with these crimes.

There was a time when apologists for the administration tried to spin the extra‑territorial killing capacity as a mark of an emerging “superpower.” Respected strategic analysts described it as a “new boldness.” But Operation Hard Ball shatters that fantasy. The killings were not the work of a finely‑tuned state apparatus; they were the messy, reckless outpourings of jailed gangsters who had been allowed to operate with impunity. The “superpower” narrative has been replaced by the reality of a state that cannot even control its own prisons, let alone project power responsibly.

For the Indian diaspora — millions of citizens of Indian origin who live, work, and raise families in the West — this is a moment of deep hurt and humiliation. Their adopted homelands now see India as an exporter of criminality. Canada’s government designated Lawrence Bishnoi as a terrorist in September 2025. The United States is holding press conferences to announce the capture of Indian‑connected gangsters that India itself could not catch. What does that say about the nation’s credibility?

When a Police Officer Becomes an Extortionist: The Nagra Affair

Among the 24 persons arrested or identified in Operation Hard Ball, one name stands out with the force of a moral detonation: Gurinder Jeet Singh Nagra, an Assistant Sub‑Inspector of the Punjab Police, posted at Tanda police station in Hoshiarpur district. The FBI’s complaint details how Nagra, acting at the behest of the Jaggu Bhagwanpuria gang, targeted a family residing in Los Angeles. The allegation is staggering: Nagra threatened to frame the family’s relatives in Punjab in a murder case unless they paid USD 400,000 — roughly Rs. 4 crore.

The murder in question was the January 2026 killing of Nita Balwinder Singh Satkartar, a hardware store owner and member of the Aam Aadmi Party, who was shot dead by three unidentified assailants in Tanda. ASI Nagra was one of the investigating officers. The FBI report states that in April 2026, the gang operative Gurral Singh instructed Nagra to put pressure on a specific individual, referred to as the victim. Nagra met the father of that individual, threatened the entire family, and warned that they would all be arrested in the murder case if the money was not transferred. Soon after, a press conference was held in Tanda where the family was publicly named as accused — all the while the extortion demand continued.

An American Attorney has now announced that the extradition of ASI Nagra will be sought. “He will soon be in our custody,” the press release stated. The Punjab Police, belatedly, removed Nagra from his post, but the damage is done. An Indian policeman, while in uniform, tried to extort a foreign resident by abusing a murder investigation. This is not a case of a rogue officer; it is a snapshot of a system where the line between law‑keeper and law‑breaker has been completely dissolved.

How many such Nagras are there? How many police stations in Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh — states with porous gang‑politics‑police nexuses — are run by officers who moonlight as agents of incarcerated criminals? The FBI has answered that question in part: the trawl net of Operation Hard Ball has caught not just 24 foot soldiers but evidence of police complicity embedded deep within India’s security fabric.

The Silence of the Home Minister and the ’Tough on Crime’ Farce

The BJP has built its electoral dominance on a platform of muscular nationalism and zero‑tolerance to crime. Union Home Minister Amit Shah is projected as the iron man who cleans up the mess. Yet, what we witness in Gujarat and Assam — both BJP‑ruled states — is the systematic VIP treatment given to the very gangsters who spread terror across continents. Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann had directly accused the Union Home Ministry of allowing VIP privileges to Lawrence Bishnoi inside the Sabarmati jail. That allegation demands an answer. Not a denial in a press conference, but an answer with facts: who allowed the phones inside? Which officer turned a blind eye? Was there a higher political patron?

Similarly, the question must be posed to Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. Under his government’s nose, inside the Silchar Central Jail, Jaggu Bhagwanpuria built a kingdom of a thousand henchmen. The Assam Police, supposedly one of the most efficient forces in the country, failed to notice that an inmate was running an international extortion racket. Did the intelligence machinery not pick up a single call? Did no whistle‑blower come forward? Or is the truth far more sinister — that such empires are allowed to exist because they serve certain interests?

The External Affairs Ministry’s response, through High Commissioner Dinesh Patnaik in Canada, was to “welcome the arrests” and state that India has been asking its friends to act against transnational gangs. That is a baffling piece of diplomatic doublespeak. India’s plea to friendly nations is essentially a confession: “Please do the policing that we are unable to do, even though the criminals are lodged in our own jails.” There is no escape from this shame. The US did not need India’s request; it conducted Operation Hard Ball because its own citizens were at risk. The Indian state, meanwhile, stood by as a passive, shamed spectator.

A Collapsed System and a Tarnished Image

For decades, the Indian police system has been a subject of lament, but the revelations now push it beyond lament into a full‑blown existential crisis. When a country’s prisons become the headquarters of international crime, when its police officers act as agents of extortion for jailed dons, and when the entire national security architecture fails to detect this for years, the state must be declared comatose. The reputation of a nation is built not on slogans but on the efficiency, integrity, and courage of its institutions. If those institutions are hollowed out, all the “Vishwaguru” posturing becomes a cruel joke.

The FBI has demonstrated that it has the will and the capacity to reach into other jurisdictions and gather evidence. It has laid bare what the National Investigation Agency, the Enforcement Directorate, and countless state police forces could not. The US system did not wait for a political master’s permission; it acted on the rule of law. In contrast, the Indian system waited until the scandal was delivered to its doorstep wrapped in an American indictment.

Consider the timeline: Gurral Singh of the Bhagwanpuria gang instructed ASI Nagra to extort money in April 2026. The FBI built its case, coordinated with multiple agencies, and executed arrests. And what did India do? It removed one ASI from his post after the American Attorney spoke. No investigation of the jail administrations, no crackdown on the systemic collusion, no accountability for the jail ministers. The only action taken was under foreign pressure. That is what a collapsed sovereignty looks like.

Criticisms

The following criticisms are drawn directly from the events detailed above and are presented in the passive voice, as reflections on the conduct of public figures, governments, and institutions:

• The Government of India is accused of fostering an environment in which internationally designated gangsters operate freely from Indian prisons.
• VIP treatment is alleged to have been provided to Lawrence Bishnoi inside the Sabarmati Central Jail under the watch of the Gujarat administration.
• The Union Home Ministry is severely criticized for failing to prevent the supply of mobile phones and internet devices to high‑risk inmates.
• The Assam government led by Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma is blamed for the unchecked growth of Jaggu Bhagwanpuria’s global extortion network from Silchar Central Jail.
• Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ‘strong leader’ image is questioned for the unprecedented international embarrassment caused by the revelation of state‑embedded criminal syndicates.
• The National Security Advisor and the intelligence apparatus are faulted for their inability to detect or disrupt the transnational operations of jailed gangsters.
• The Punjab Police is condemned for the criminal conduct of ASI Gurinder Jeet Singh Nagra, who is now sought for extradition by the United States.
• The External Affairs Ministry’s response is considered a diversionary tactic that sidesteps the government’s own responsibility for the collapse of internal security.
• A failure to act on repeated warnings from the Canadian government about the Bishnoi‑Nijjar link is noted, leading to a further deterioration of diplomatic relations.
• The Indian state’s credibility is seen as having been gravely damaged among its diaspora and global partners, with the reputation of its police and prison systems in tatters.

Operation Hard Ball is more than an international policing success. It is a mirror held up to India, and in that mirror, the image is not of a confident, rising power but of a state that has lost control over its own coercive instruments. The 24 arrests made by the FBI are a glaring reminder that while we were busy polishing headlines, the foundations of our republic were being hollowed out from within — one phone call from a jail cell at a time.

See All Articles on Investing by Ankur Warikoo    Download Retirement Planner

The 40 Crore Retirement Bomb: Is Sandeep Jethwani’s Math Right or Are We All Doomed?

A few days ago, a clip from a podcast featuring wealth management veteran Sandeep Jethwani went viral for all the wrong reasons. The host, Sonia Shenoy, asked a simple question that haunts every middle-class professional: “I am 40 years old, my monthly expenses are roughly 2 lakh rupees. What retirement corpus do I need if I retire at 60?” Sandeep thought for a moment and dropped a bombshell — 40 crore rupees. Sonia, visibly stunned, clarified: “This is excluding my own house, car, everything. Just liquid corpus.” He doubled down. The internet erupted. Memes flooded social media. “South Bombay elites are so out of touch,” people cried. “Forty crore suna hai? Chillar hai kya?”

But here’s the thing. Sandeep Jethwani is no Instagram finfluencer chasing clicks. He has spent decades in wealth management, much of it at IIFL Wealth, a reputable firm. He co-founded Deserve, a SEBI-registered portfolio management company that today oversees assets worth approximately 16,000 crore rupees. He sits on SEBI working groups and is widely regarded as an authority on wealth management in India. So if he says 40 crore, he isn’t shooting from the hip. There is a mathematical spine behind that terrifying number, and it deserves a closer look — not to scare us into giving up, but to understand what it really takes to retire comfortably in India.

Why 9% Inflation Is Not a Conspiracy

The first pillar of Sandeep’s calculation is an inflation rate of 9%. Many of us instinctively scoff because the government’s official Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation hovers around 5-6%. But CPI is a blunt instrument. Its basket gives heavy weightage to food grains — something urban households spend a shrinking portion of their income on. Meanwhile, expenses that dominate an urban professional’s life — healthcare, education, travel, and lifestyle — are racing ahead at brutal speeds.

Consider healthcare. The cost of a routine surgery or even a diagnostic test has been inflating at 12-14% annually. That single grey hair you spot can double your health-related spending every five to six years. Education, especially in private institutions, has become a bottomless pit. Even government-school seats are scarcer as aspirants multiply. Travel costs, dining out, utilities — all are marching upward. Independent lifestyle inflation easily touches 9-10% per year. So while the official number might soothe us, the lived reality of an urban earner is much harsher. Sandeep’s 9% is not alarmist; it is painfully grounded.

The Brutal Arithmetic of 40 Crore

Let’s crunch the numbers that Sandeep likely ran in his head. Monthly expense today: 2 lakh rupees. Inflate this by 9% per year for 20 years. By the time this 40-year-old person reaches 60, their monthly expense will balloon to roughly 11.2 lakh rupees per month — that’s over 1.34 crore rupees annually. Now assume a lifespan of 90 years (urban life expectancy is climbing), giving a retirement period of 30 years. Multiply 1.34 crore by 30, and you get 40.2 crore. Simple, terrifying, done.

But that calculation assumes two very rigid things. First, that you withdraw the entire 30-year corpus on day one of retirement and stash it under the mattress earning zero returns. Second, that your expenses will remain perfectly indexed to 9% inflation forever, with no flexibility. Both are absurd. No sensible retirement plan works that way. To find out whether 40 crore is the absolute truth or a deeply exaggerated warning, we need to build a real-world model that mirrors how people actually save and invest.

What a Retirement Plan Actually Looks Like

When you design a retirement strategy, three elements interlock: accumulation, taxation, and decumulation.

Accumulation: You don’t just plonk all savings into a single fixed deposit. A working professional’s portfolio spans fixed-income instruments, large-cap funds, mid-cap, and small-cap stocks. The mix changes with age and risk appetite.

Taxation: The government’s hand is always present. Long-term capital gains on equity are taxed at 12.5% today, but may climb. FD interest still attracts slab-rate tax. A prudent plan factors these outflows.

Decumulation: The most underrated piece. When you retire, you don’t sell every investment. You keep the bulk of your corpus invested, drawing only what you need each year — say a year’s worth of expenses — while the rest continues to compound. This arbitrage is the magic that keeps many a retirement from collapsing prematurely.

Modeling a Real Retirement: The 25-Year-Old Starting Fresh

Let’s simulate a 25-year-old with no existing savings, investing Rs 10,000 a month, stepping up the SIP by 5% each year until retirement at 60. The asset allocation during the working years: 10% in fixed-income (assuming 7% pre-tax returns), 40% in large-cap mutual funds (12%), 30% in mid-cap (15%), and 20% in small-cap (18%). We’ll apply a 30% tax on fixed-income gains and 20% on equity gains — deliberately conservative to future-proof the math.

Post-retirement, the allocation shifts toward safety: 50% fixed-income, 50% large-cap equity. The assumed inflation stays at 9%. The goal is to fund a monthly expense of Rs 1 lakh in today’s terms (which inflates accordingly) until age 85.

With the Rs 10,000 monthly SIP, the corpus at age 60 lands around 11.33 crore. Sounds massive. But the first year’s withdrawal — about 92 lakh rupees — quickly eats into it. Because the younger you had stopped contributing, the corpus peaks at withdrawal and then starts declining. At age 77, the money runs out completely. Not good.

Now, nudge the SIP to Rs 15,000 a month. The retirement corpus jumps. And because the remaining amount keeps growing even as you withdraw, the money never hits zero. At age 85, you still have about 26.6 crore left. That’s the power of a slightly higher saving rate and continued compounding during retirement.

What if the 25-year-old takes more risk? Change the working-age allocation to 30% each in large, mid, and small-cap, with 10% fixed-income. Returns improve over the long haul, pushing the corpus higher and making the decumulation even smoother. Same conclusion: small tweaks in saving rate or asset mix drastically alter the outcome.

So What About the 40-Year-Old with 2 Lakh Expenses?

Now, let’s apply the same logic to the original question. The 40-year-old has monthly expenses of Rs 2 lakh today. We’ll assume they’ve been investing Rs 50,000 a month (a 25% savings rate on a Rs 2 lakh income) and will continue doing so, stepping up annually by 5%, until 60. With the aggressive 9% inflation, their required first-year withdrawal at retirement would be about 1.34 crore (monthly expense of 11.2 lakh).

Running the numbers, this person would retire with roughly 28.5 crore. But here’s the kicker — that corpus gets exhausted around age 84-85. Not 90. The 40 crore that Sandeep mentioned was for a 30-year retirement funded entirely upfront; our more realistic model shows a deficit even at 28.5 crore.

Now, amp up the monthly investment to Rs 2 lakh. Perhaps the person’s income has grown, or they’ve cut flab from expenses. At that saving rate, the retirement corpus touches about 35 crore. And because the decumulation phase keeps the remainder invested, the plan survives comfortably past age 90, leaving roughly 14 crore behind. That’s a fully funded, no-sweat retirement. Notice, the gap between 35 crore and 40 crore is not massive. Sandeep’s ballpark, while blunt, isn’t from a different galaxy.

So, Do We All Just Give Up and Head to the Himalayas?

Not yet. The exercise reveals a deeper truth: the single most powerful lever to secure a comfortable retirement is not just timely SIPs or picking the next multibagger stock. It is income growth. If you earn less than Rs 50,000 a month, no investment wizardry can catapult you out of your current orbit. You must focus relentlessly on upskilling, moving into high-growth areas like technology, AI, or entrepreneurship. A salaried professional has a ceiling; a business owner, if successful, has none. The 40 crore figure is not a stick to beat yourself with — it’s a mirror that reflects both the power of inflation and the necessity of earning more.

For those already in the Rs 1 lakh to Rs 2 lakh monthly club, the math says: try to invest at least 20% of your income now. But as your income rises — and it likely will — lock in a higher percentage. If you’re earning Rs 4 lakh a month, a 25% saving rate pumps Rs 1 lakh into your portfolio each month. That’s the difference between scraping through and flourishing. The rule of thumb isn’t a fixed rupee figure; it’s about stretching your savings rate when you can, knowing that lifestyle inflation is your silent enemy. Fight the urge to let your expenses gallop at 9% while your savings trot at 5%.

Citations and References

• Sandeep Jethwani’s background: Co-founder of Deserve, ex-IIFL Wealth; SEBI working group member; assets under management approximately 16,000 crore. (Publicly available through SEBI filings and media interviews.)
• Inflation data: Official CPI figures from Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, India, consistently hover around 5-6% in recent years. However, sectoral inflation — healthcare at 12-14% and education at 10-12% — is documented in various RBI reports and industry white papers.
• Long-term asset class returns: Fixed-income returns taken as 7% based on historical FD and PPF rates; large-cap equity at 12%, mid-cap at 15%, small-cap at 18% approximate long-term Nifty indices data (Nifty 50 TRI, Nifty Midcap 150 TRI, Nifty Smallcap 250 TRI) over 15-20 year periods.
• Tax assumptions: Long-term capital gains tax on equity currently 12.5% (as per Finance Act 2024); conservative 20% used for forward projection. Fixed-income gains taxed at slab rate, assumed 30% for high earners.

Conclusion: What Should You Do Now?

• The 40 crore number is not a hoax; it’s a worst-case scenario if you ignore post-retirement compounding and assume rigid 9% inflation forever. In reality, a well-managed portfolio needs less — but still a formidable sum.
• Inflation is personal. Track your own lifestyle inflation honestly. For urban professionals, 9% is more real than CPI’s 6%.
• Start early, and if you haven’t, start now. A 25-year-old with a modest SIP can build a retirement fortress. A 40-year-old can still reach it with higher savings or income growth.
• Asset allocation matters. A diversified mix of equity and debt, adjusted as you age, with a systematic withdrawal strategy, dramatically stretches your corpus.
• Your earning capacity is your greatest asset. Invest in skills, side hustles, or business ventures that can break the ceiling on your monthly income.
• Don’t obsess over the absolute rupee target. Focus on the percentage of income you save. As earnings rise, let the savings rate rise too.
• Use the spreadsheet linked in resources to play out your own scenario. Numbers change lives when they become personal.

Forty crore may sound like a cruel joke, but it’s a wake-up call wrapped in shock value. The path to retirement security isn’t about hitting a magic number; it’s about understanding the math and taking action today — with whatever you have, wherever you are.

See All Articles

Satluj: The Film That Was Pulled, The Politics That Was Born

It vanished without a trace. On a quiet weekend, ZEE5 quietly dropped the Punjabi film Satluj on its OTT platform, and within hours, it was gone. No official order, no public reasoning—just the silent erasure of a cinematic work that had already waited four years to see the light of day. This is the story of a film, of course, but also of a state that is being relentlessly pushed to remember its wounds, while those who govern calculate how to turn memory into a vote bank. Once again, a film is not just a film. It is a matchstick thrown into a tinderbox called Punjab.

The Vanishing Act

The title itself carries a tortured history. Initially named Gallu Gara (Punjabi for “genocide”), it was forced to change to Punjab 95 and then, finally, to Satluj. The film revolves around Jaswant Singh Khalra, a human rights activist who exposed the extrajudicial killings carried out by the Punjab Police during the dark days of the militancy era. He was abducted and murdered in 1995. His wife, Paramjit Kaur Khalra, has alleged that the officers involved were rewarded with promotions under subsequent Akali governments. The film did not seek to incite; it sought to document. Yet, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) had ordered 127 cuts, and when the producers refused to bow, the film was denied a theatrical certificate. They finally released it directly on ZEE5 under the new name. On 10 August 2025, it appeared. By 11 August, it had been pulled. Government sources told ANI that the film did not have the requisite certificate, and the ministry concerned asked ZEE5 to take it down. The document of that instruction, however, remains as invisible as the film itself.

The Bittu-Dosanjh Conundrum

To understand the stakes, one must first observe the bewildering flip-flop surrounding Diljit Dosanjh, the actor who plays Khalra in the film. In January 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Diljit, posted a photograph, and described him as “a confluence of talent and tradition.” Flash forward to the film’s release, and suddenly Union Minister of State for Railways and Food Processing, Ravneet Singh Bittu, calls Diljit an “imposter” who “bats in Los Angeles to make money” and makes films on “vulgar songs.” Bittu, who lost the 2024 Lok Sabha election from Ludhiana and was then rewarded with a Rajya Sabha seat from Rajasthan and a ministerial berth, seems to have forgotten that when Diljit’s Sardar 3 released in June 2025, the BJP’s national spokesperson R.P. Singh hailed him as a “national asset.” The same Diljit is now a fraud. The same meeting that was the government’s public relations coup is now an inconvenient memory.

What caused this about-turn? Bittu is the grandson of former Punjab Chief Minister Beant Singh, who was assassinated in a bomb blast in 1995. Beant Singh’s tenure saw the elevation of K.P.S. Gill as Punjab’s police chief—a figure whose role remains deeply contested, with one section calling him a hero and another a villain, while a third simply demands that the full truth of police excesses be recorded and discussed. Bittu, once a Congressman close to Rahul Gandhi, is now said to enjoy the patronage of Union Home Minister Amit Shah. His sudden attack on the film suggests a political script being written from Delhi, not Chandigarh.

The Political Chessboard: Who Gains from the Chaos?

The film’s removal did not silence it; it amplified it. In villages across Punjab, gurdwaras have begun screening Satluj. Sukhbir Singh Badal’s Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) has instructed its cadre to organise screenings so that “the current generation learns how the barbaric Congress governments suppressed Khalra and thousands of innocent Sikh youth.” The Akalis, desperate to reclaim relevance after their split with the BJP and the rise of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), are riding the wave. But there are cross-currents. Paramjit Kaur Khalra herself contested elections in 1999 on the ticket of the Sarv Hind Shiromani Akali Dal, a breakaway faction, and in 2019 on the Punjab Ekta Party ticket. The political players are numerous and tangled.

Meanwhile, Ravneet Singh Bittu’s newfound aggression coincides with murmurs in Punjab’s political circles that the BJP is preparing to use the film’s controversy to wedge open the Sikh community’s faultlines. The memory of the Amritpal Singh phenomenon still smoulders. Amritpal, the radical preacher currently lodged in Dibrugarh jail under the Assam government (a BJP-ruled state), won the 2024 Lok Sabha polls as an independent from Khadoor Sahib, along with another independent, Sarabjit Singh, son of Indira Gandhi’s assassin Beant Singh. Amritpal’s supporters call him “Bhindranwale 2.0,” and his lawyer is Rajdev Singh Khalsa, a former MP linked to the Rashtriya Sikh Sangat—often described as the RSS’s Sikh wing. In 2023, Amritpal’s mob stormed Ajnala police station to free his associates. The deep state’s shadow players do not retire; they change disguises.

Even Deep Sidhu, the actor-activist who founded Waris Punjab De, died in 2022, but his political imprint remains. His supporters hoisted the Nishan Sahib at the Red Fort during the farmers’ protest, and his organisation later allied with the Akali Dal. The film’s controversy seems designed to fracture the moderate Sikh voter base, creating a churn that benefits those who thrive on polarization. The BJP’s earlier demand for the film’s release—remember R.P. Singh’s statement that blocking it was “continuing the suppression of Sardars”?—has now been replaced by Bittu’s full-throated opposition. This is not inconsistency; it is strategy.

A Pattern of Cinematic Politics

Let there be no confusion: the Modi government knows how to deploy cinema as an electoral instrument. The pattern is now unmistakable.

Film	Timing of Release / Controversy	Government’s Role	Outcome
The Kashmir Files	March 2022, months before UP elections	Screened in Parliament; PM Modi, ministers endorsed it; BJP cadres mobilized	Fanned communal polarization, contributed to BJP’s UP victory
The Kerala Story	May 2023, ahead of Karnataka elections	PM Modi cited it in rallies; state governments made it tax-free; BJP leaders hosted screenings	Became a campaign tool, though BJP lost Karnataka; communal atmosphere heightened
The Bengal Files	2023, before West Bengal panchayat polls	BJP leaders promoted; party used it to target Mamata Banerjee	Sharpened Hindu-minority narrative in Bengal
Satluj (formerly Punjab 95)	August 2025, ahead of Punjab assembly polls (2026)	Pulled from OTT; minister attacks actor; BJP earlier demanded release, now opposes	Film goes viral in villages; Akali Dal and others exploit; Sigh community polarization deepens
The Sabarmati Report	2025, produced with BJP backing	Screened in Parliament with full cabinet present	Continues the narrative of Hindu victimhood, justifies 2002 riots

Each of these films was promoted with the full machinery of the ruling party. WhatsApp groups hummed with “must watch” messages. Chief ministers and ministers flocked to theatres. The PM himself used them as rhetorical ammunition. The Sabarmati Report, which rewrites the Godhra carnage as a premeditated terror conspiracy, was even shown in Parliament. But when a film dares to document the state’s own violence against Sikhs—a community the BJP has long wooed—it is abruptly pulled, its certificate questioned, its actor insulted.

The Ghosts of Punjab’s Past: Khalra, KPS Gill, and Unhealed Wounds

Jaswant Singh Khalra’s investigation into custodial deaths shook the establishment. He filed writ petitions, gathered cremation records, and demonstrated that hundreds of young Sikhs were being cremated as “unidentified” by the police. He was killed. His wife Paramjit Kaur has repeatedly stated that the officers responsible were later promoted by Parkash Singh Badal’s Akali government. This is not a tale of one-party villainy; it is a bipartisan saga of brutality covered by political convenience. K.P.S. Gill, the celebrated “supercop,” is both deified and demonized. The film does not glorify militancy; it simply holds up a mirror to the state’s violence. Yet the CBFC’s 127 cuts suggest that the state still cannot bear that reflection.

The official reason for pulling the film from OTT is that it lacked a censor certificate for online release. But the film had already been scheduled for the Toronto International Film Festival in 2023 and was withdrawn after the Indian government objected. No uproar then. The uproar now is not about certification; it is about the electoral season. Punjab votes for a new assembly in 2026. The memories of 1984, of the anti-Sikh pogrom, of the Khalistan militancy, of the police excesses of the 1990s—these are not just history; they are combustible material waiting for a spark. The film is the spark, but the arsonist is in Delhi.

The Hypocrisy of Selective Censorship

Ask any filmmaker: the censor board’s scissors are flexible. A film that paints Muslims as terrorists and Hindus as victims gets a red-carpet rollout, tax exemptions, and prime ministerial endorsements. A film that shows a Sikh human rights activist uncovering state-sanctioned murder gets 127 cuts and is forced into a bureaucratic limbo. When the producers bypass the board and release it digitally, it is dragged back into the shadows. The Information and Broadcasting Ministry has now formed a high-level inter-departmental committee to examine the matter—but the official order to take down the film has still not been produced publicly. Everything is sourced from unnamed officials, a classic technique to avoid accountability.

The government’s supporters will argue that Satluj could revive separatist sentiments. Yet the film has been seen in villages and gurdwaras across Punjab, and not a single incident of violence has been reported. The real fear, it seems, is not of violence but of votes. The Sikh voter, bruised by decades of trauma, might finally see the grand narrative of Hindu-Sikh unity as a transactional myth. The BJP, which has struggled to make inroads in Punjab without the Akali crutch, needs a fractured electorate. A polarizing film controversy could split the moderate Sikh vote, weaken the Akali Dal, and create space for radical alternatives—some of which, like Waris Punjab De, have RSS-linked legal defence. The fire is lit not to burn down a house, but to clear the ground for a new one.

A State in Distress: The Real Issues Ignored

While politicians and news anchors obsess over a film, Punjab is gasping. The state has an unemployment rate that regularly tops national charts. Agriculture, the backbone of Punjab, is in perpetual crisis, with farmers crushed by debt and the collapse of the MSP regime. Drug addiction has hollowed out entire villages; youth are fleeing to Canada, the UK, Australia, and the US, often through dangerous illegal routes. Just a day before the Satluj controversy erupted, news broke that two Punjab-origin gangsters, operating from Indian jails, were running extortion rackets targeting Punjabi diaspora families in America. The US is deporting young Punjabi men in handcuffs and leg chains. These are the stories that should dominate political discourse. Instead, the state’s ruling class chooses to exhume the ghosts of the 1990s, not to heal but to harvest.

Professor Harminder Singh Bhatti, speaking on a Punjabi YouTube channel, lamented that the repeated “pin pricks” of such controversies are meant to emotionally blackmail the community, to keep old wounds open so that political operators can pick at them. He asked, “Why this time? Why this song?” The answer is the election cycle. The targeting of Diljit Dosanjh—a global icon who has never been associated with extremism—is a message: even the most beloved cultural figures will be attacked if they refuse to be instruments of the state’s narrative.

The Smoke Before the Fire

On 17 July, Prime Minister Modi is scheduled to visit Punjab. The signals he sends—or withholds—will be crucial. Will he acknowledge the film? Will he reprimand Bittu’s outburst? Or will his silence be the loudest signal of all? The controversy has already achieved one thing: it has drawn a line under the present and forced Punjab to look back. Back at the Bittu grandfather’s tenure, back at the Badal government’s complicity, back at the Congress’s role in Operation Blue Star and the 1984 massacres, back at the Akali-BJP alliance’s expedient politics. Everyone has blood on their hands, and everyone now sees a chance to wash theirs by pointing at someone else’s.

The film’s removal from an OTT platform did not suppress it; it distributed it. Diljit, in an Instagram live, said he had not even promoted the release because he feared it would be blocked. Now he urged people, “Share the film link, please! Whoever has my movie link, share it.” And they are sharing it. In gurdwaras, in village squares, on encrypted groups, Satluj is now being watched by those who would have never gone to a multiplex. The government’s heavy-handedness has turned a small digital release into a mass movement of memory.

There is a cynical brilliance in this. A film that may have gone unnoticed becomes a political weapon the moment it is banned. The BJP, which is already out of power in Punjab and discredited after the farmers’ protest, does not need to win the next election; it only needs to ensure that the Akali Dal does not recover and that the Sikh vote splits further. The film controversy helps create exactly such a schism. Even if the BJP is blamed for censorship, the bigger game is the communal polarization it triggers. A section of the Sikh community, feeling embattled, may gravitate toward more radical politics, and that radical fringe, when nurtured in the laboratory of a ruling party’s intelligence agencies, can be used as a permanent bogey to justify central dominance. It is the oldest story in the subcontinent: wound a community, then offer to bandage it. Only this time, the wound has a name: Satluj.

Punjab’s rivers are in spate, as they were last year when a devastating flood swept away homes and fields. But the real deluge is of a different kind—a flood of memories, deliberately released. Who will survive this flood? The answer lies not in a film, but in the voting booth. And those who are orchestrating this tragedy know it better than anyone.

Criticisms

The following criticisms are expressed directly, in passive voice, addressing the actions of public figures, governments, and political entities.

• The Modi government is criticized for its strategic exploitation of cinema as a tool of communal polarization and electoral manipulation.
• The BJP is accused of a glaring double standard, promoting films that vilify Muslims while suppressing a documentary-like narrative of state atrocities against Sikhs.
• Union Minister Ravneet Singh Bittu is condemned for his sudden virulent attack on Diljit Dosanjh, described earlier by his own party as a national asset.
• The Central Board of Film Certification is faulted for imposing 127 cuts on a historically significant film, effectively blocking its release and then blaming the producers for bypassing the process.
• The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is criticized for pulling the film from OTT without a public, written order, relying instead on anonymous sources to justify censorship.
• The Akali Dal is criticized for attempting to exploit the film’s controversy for political rehabilitation, despite a documented history of rewarding officers implicated in extrajudicial killings during the militancy era.
• All major parties, including Congress and AAP, are faulted for remaining silent on the deeper questions of police brutality and human rights violations that the film raises, preferring to indulge in competitive victimhood.
• The media is criticized for amplifying the film’s removal as a spectacle while ignoring Punjab’s grinding crises of unemployment, farmer distress, drug abuse, mass migration, and extortion rackets.
• Political leaders are criticized for reopening the wounds of the 1980s and 1990s not to seek truth or reconciliation, but to carve vote banks from a traumatized population.
• The Prime Minister’s silence on his own minister’s inflammatory remarks is criticized as a tacit endorsement of the politics of hate and division.
• The security establishment is criticized for consistently blocking films that scrutinize state violence while facilitating the screening of politically convenient narratives within Parliament itself.

---

See All Articles

Drowning in Delusion: Why Our Cities Compare Themselves to Venice When They Can’t Even Drain Water

The moment the first monsoon cloud rumble over the Gangetic plains, an old, tired ritual begins. Water invades our streets, our homes, our parking lots. And with equal predictability, social media lights up with a peculiar comparison: “Look, Ghaziabad has become Venice!” or “Welcome to the Venice of Noida.” As if a drowned underpass and a submerged scooter were evidence of a metamorphosis into a romantic lagoon city. But pause. Is this praise for Ghaziabad, or a casual, unthinking insult to a city that has survived fourteen centuries with engineering that still holds? This annual metaphor is not just lazy journalism—it is a symptom of a deep civic decay that our rulers have normalised, and we have compliantly accepted. Every monsoon, our leaders return to their pre‑rain promises of turning cities into Paris, London, or Singapore. Yet by the first downpour, we are forced to gaze at a dirty puddle and call it Venice. The gap between rhetoric and reality is not just a failure of drainage; it is a monument to systemic corruption, voter apathy, and an administrative class that has perfected the art of pretending.

The Venice Mirage: A Medieval City That Outlives Our Flyovers

Venice has a network of canals that function like highways. Its iconic Rialto Bridge has stood since the 14th century, watched by millions of tourists who cross it without fear of collapse. Now imagine, for a moment, if Venice were located in India. Every single one of those canal bridges would have been torn down and rebuilt at least three times by now, each reconstruction giving birth to a fresh scam. The buildings beside the Grand Canal would have been bulldozed for a “central vista” project. The gondolas would have been outsourced to a crony contractor who would deliver fibreglass tubs that sink. Venice, as a living city, would not have survived even a single term of our municipal governance. Yet here, after every rainstorm, we drag its name into our mess as a punchline. We never bother to learn what actually happens in Venice during acqua alta—the high tides that flood St. Mark’s Square. The Venetians have elevated walkways, real‑time tide alerts, and a billion‑euro flood barrier system called MOSE. They don’t post WhatsApp forwards saying “Venice turned into Ghaziabad.” They just get on with resilient, expensive, and publicly‑audited infrastructure—something our elected representatives have no intention of delivering.

“Venice, if it were in India, would have its canals encroached, its bridges auctioned, and its name used to shield incompetence. It survives because it was built before our breed of contractors was born.”

The Propaganda of Paris: How Our Cities Were Sold a Dream They Never Bought

The pre‑election stump speech is a genre of its own. Every neta, from municipal corporator to Prime Minister, promises that your city will soon rival Paris. Beautiful footpaths, gleaming metro stations, world‑class sewerage. The reality, however, is a Paris that exists only in PowerPoints submitted to the Smart City Mission. According to a 2022 CAG audit, of the 100 cities chosen under the Smart City Mission, barely 45% of the funds had been utilised by the extended deadline, and even completed projects often existed only on dashboards. The Parisian dream quickly curdles when the first monsoon hits. The smart poles become electrocution hazards. The command‑and‑control centres turn into rooms where officials watch live feeds of citizens wading through chest‑deep water, helpless. Yet the same politicians who inaugurated those smart poles stand for re‑election, and the same voters who dodged potholes on the way to the booth press the button again. It is a cycle so perfect that the corruption‑industrial complex has no reason to break it.

The Missing Link and Other Monuments to Corruption

Take the Mumbai‑Pune “missing link” project—a crucial expressway segment meant to reduce travel time between two of India’s economic powerhouses. The design came from Canada. The cables were sourced from Malaysia. Cable testing was done in Austria. Wind tunnel tests in Denmark. Nations lent their expertise, and Indian contractors executed the work. The result? A single monsoon was enough to trigger a landslide on the tunnel, leak water like a sieve, and shut down the link. As reported in The Indian Express, the very first heavy rain of 2023 caused a landslip and water seepage that betrayed the international collaboration. When you assemble a multinational engineering dream and it fails like a mud house, the problem is not materials—it is what happens between the sanction letter and the cement mixer. Bribes, substandard inputs, and the complete absence of accountability. This is not an aberration. It is the template for every flyover, every subway, every revived riverfront project. We import technology from the best, and then sprinkle a generous dose of Indian jugaad—which, in official parlance, means cutting costs by making kickbacks invisible.

Mumbai’s Silent Drowning: The Arrogance of Not Comparing

There is one peculiar, and almost admirable, trait about Mumbai during the monsoon. The city that drowns year after year, that loses lives to open manholes, that watches its lifeline local trains stop for hours—this city never compares itself to Venice or Ghaziabad. It does not joke about becoming Atlantis. Mumbai, in its waterlogged arrogance, refuses to be lumped with other drowning cities. Maybe it’s the self‑image of a maximum city that believes its water is somehow different, more tragic, more cinematic. Or maybe it’s a survival tactic: if you don’t compare, you don’t have to demand. The city simply goes silent, endures, and then waits for the next season. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, one of the richest urban bodies in Asia, collects thousands of crores in property tax yet cannot ensure that a receding tide doesn’t turn a street into a swimming pool. And the citizenry, trained by decades of this routine, has internalised that silence is the price of living in the dream metropolis.

This silence is a political gift to the administration. When the people stop making noise, the scandal becomes ambient. No one holds a press conference to ask why the Mithi river, after so many clean‑up drives, still overflows. No one questions why a new coastal road is built on reclaimed land while the existing drainage collapses. The city’s elite complain only about the resale value of their sea‑facing flats, not about the slums that get washed away. So, the monsoon becomes an event to be filmed, not fought. That is the real tragedy: not water on the roads, but a people who have stopped expecting dry roads.

Data Table: The Smart City Scam – Promises vs. Reality

Sources: CAG Report No. 6 of 2022; Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs portals (as of March 2023)

Parameter	Promise / Vision	Reality
Number of cities	100 Smart Cities with world‑class infrastructure by 2023	Mission extended multiple times; only 5,924 projects completed of 7,934 planned, many only on paper.
Budget utilisation	Rs 2,05,018 crore total outlay, fully utilised with impact	Actual expenditure around 45% of funds; significant sums parked in bank accounts earning interest.
Storm water drainage	24x7 storm water pumping, zero waterlogging	In 2022 and 2023, almost all Smart Cities faced severe waterlogging; no city had functional integrated drainage.
Iconic infrastructure	Landmark bridges, smart roads, command centres	Multiple bridge collapses (e.g., Mumbai‑Pune missing link, flyovers in Varanasi, FOB in Mumbai); command centres mainly used for photo ops.
Citizen participation	Active citizen engagement through digital platforms	App‑based complaints often auto‑closed without resolution; no real grievance redressal mechanism.

The Media’s Role: How Venice Became a Comedic Crutch

A significant part of the problem lies in the newsrooms. Every monsoon, television channels rush to find the most viral visuals of waterlogged streets and then anchor their packages with a smirk: “Ghaziabad is now Venice!” This is not clever; it is a betrayal of journalism. Calling a toxic, sewage‑laced pool of water “Venice” trivialises the misery of those who have to wade through it to reach a hospital, an exam hall, or a daily wage job. It reduces a systemic failure to a comedy reel. Venice is a city that has fought for its survival against water with architecture, science, and civic will. Our cities drown because of a complete absence of the same. The media, instead of exposing the nexus between corrupt contractors and municipal engineers, chooses to play with words. It is easier to do a cutaway to a guy rowing a makeshift boat and laugh than to ask the mayor why the drain cleaning budget vanished. The news anchors who perform this ritual are not just lazy; they are co‑conspirators in normalising a disaster.

Public Complicity: The Voters Who Forgive Everything

And then, there is us. The people who wake up to a flooded living room, curse for five minutes, and then upload a video with a laughing emoji. The same people who will, months later, vote for the very same municipal councillor because he “got the street lights fixed”—never mind that the street lights were installed only after the previous ones were stolen. The power of the vote is immense, and in India, it is consistently misused. We have normalised potholes, waterlogging, and collapsing infrastructure as acts of nature, not acts of criminal negligence. We have accepted that every monsoon will bring the same photographs, the same struggles, the same promises. By doing so, we have given a lifetime licence to the corrupt system. The leaders know that roads will wash away, and people will still reach the polling booth through knee‑deep water—the indelible ink will mark their fingers even if their shoes are ruined. There is a certain sadomasochism in this relationship. As long as the water recedes eventually, the forgiveness is immediate. And so, the cycle perpetuates, more vicious with every monsoon.

The River at Your Doorstep: A Dark Gift of the Rain

Perhaps the only honest thing the monsoon does is bring the river to your doorstep. We have systematically murdered our rivers—encroached, filled with trash, turned into drains. The monsoon, in its own way, forces us to remember that a river once flowed here. The water that accumulates on the road is a distilled sample of the river we buried under concrete. So the next time you see a “river” outside your gate, don’t call it Venice. Call it the ghost of the river we killed. Let it remind you that you paid taxes for a city that respects neither water nor its citizens. Stand in that puddle and feel what a river must have felt before we choked it. Maybe then you’ll find the anger to ask a difficult question. Or maybe you’ll just book a cab, pull up your trousers, and walk on—because that’s what smart city dwellers do.

Direct Criticisms

• To the Prime Minister and your government: You promised “Acche Din” and delivered only acche potholes. Your Smart City Mission was a smart scheme to funnel public money into private hands. Every collapsed bridge is a personal indictment of your administration’s corruption.
• To the Union Urban Development Ministry: Your dashboards are filled with photoshopped before‑after images, not real drainage. You celebrate token projects while millions wade through filth. Stop calling it a mission when it’s a racket.
• To the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and every municipal commissioner: You collect some of the highest property taxes in the country. Your silence during the floods is a confession. You are not helpless; you are complicit in trading lives for contracts.
• To the media anchors who use the “Venice of Ghaziabad” line: You are insulting a World Heritage city and trivialising human suffering. Your metaphors mask the rot. Do your job—investigate the tendering process, not the whimsical comparisons.
• To the voters of India: You have become so used to broken roads that you share memes while your neighbour loses a home. You re‑elect the same corrupt netas because they gave you a few freebies. Your vote is a weapon you keep handing to the people who hurt you. Stop complaining and start voting for accountability, not for a waterlogged selfie.
• To the contractor‑politician nexus: You have turned infrastructure into a death warrant. Your substandard materials kill people. Yet you walk free because you have perfected the art of the cut‑money. The blood on your hands is now mixed with rainwater.
• To everyone who thinks Venice is a funny reference: It is a city that built flood barriers., while we couldn’t build a single storm‑water drain. Show some shame. Don’t drag a 1,600‑year‑old city into the sewer we’ve created.

— this much.