Thursday, December 11, 2025

Data Engineer - Mphasis USA - Nov 18, 2025


See All: Miscellaneous Interviews @ FloCareer

  1. RATE CANDIDATE'S SKILLS
    Databricks
    AWS
    PySpark
    Splunk
    
  2. Implementing Machine Learning Models using Databricks and AWS
    Your team needs to deploy a machine learning model in production using Databricks and AWS services. Describe your approach to implement and deploy this model.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To deploy a machine learning model, start by developing and training the model using Databricks' MLlib or another library like TensorFlow or PyTorch. Use Databricks notebooks for collaborative development and experimentation. Leverage AWS SageMaker for model training and hosting if preferred. Store training data in AWS S3, and use Databricks' integration with S3 for seamless data access. Once the model is trained, use MLflow for model management and tracking. Deploy the model as a REST API using AWS Lambda or Databricks REST API for scalable access. Monitor model performance and update the model as needed based on new data or requirements.
  3. Building a Splunk Dashboard for Business Metrics
    Your team requires a Splunk dashboard that displays real-time business metrics for executive stakeholders. These metrics include sales figures, customer acquisition rates, and system uptime. How would you design this dashboard to ensure usability and clarity?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To design a Splunk dashboard for executive stakeholders, I would start by identifying the key metrics and KPIs that need to be displayed. I would use panels to segregate different categories of metrics, such as sales, customer acquisition, and system uptime. For usability, I would design the dashboard with a clean layout using visualizations like line charts for trends, single value panels for KPIs, and heatmaps for real-time data. I would incorporate dynamic filters to allow stakeholders to drill down into specific time periods or regions. Additionally, I would ensure the dashboard is responsive and accessible on various devices by using Splunk's Simple XML and CSS for custom styling.
  4. Handling Data Skew in PySpark
    You are working with a PySpark job that frequently fails due to data skew during a join operation. Explain how you would handle data skew to ensure successful execution.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To handle data skew in PySpark, I would start by identifying skewed keys using `groupBy('key').count().orderBy('count', ascending=False).show()`. For skew mitigation, I would consider techniques such as salting, where I add a random suffix to keys to distribute data more evenly across partitions. This involves modifying the join key as df.withColumn('salted_key', concat(col('key'), lit('_'), rand())). Using skewed key handling functions like skewedJoin() can also help. If the skew is due to a small number of distinct keys, broadcasting a small dataset with broadcast(df) can also improve performance.
  5. Implementing a Data Governance Framework
    Your organization is implementing a data governance framework on Databricks to ensure compliance and data security. Describe the key components you would include in this framework and how you would implement them.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To implement a data governance framework on Databricks, I would include:
    
    Data Cataloging: Use Databricks' Unity Catalog to maintain an inventory of datasets, their metadata, and lineage.
    
    Access Controls: Implement role-based access controls (RBAC) to manage data access permissions.
    
    Data Encryption: Enable encryption at rest and in transit to secure data.
    
    Compliance Monitoring: Use logging and monitoring tools like Splunk to track access and changes to data for compliance auditing.
    
    Data Quality and Stewardship: Assign data stewards for critical datasets and implement data quality checks.
    
    Training and Awareness: Conduct regular training sessions for employees on data governance policies and best practices.
  6. Building a Real-time Analytics Dashboard using PySpark and AWS
    Your team needs to build a real-time analytics dashboard that processes streaming data from AWS Kinesis and displays insights using PySpark on Databricks. What is your approach to design such a system?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    For building a real-time analytics dashboard, start by ingesting data using AWS Kinesis Data Streams to handle high-throughput real-time data. Use AWS Glue to transform raw data and AWS Lambda to trigger additional processing if needed. In Databricks, use PySpark's structured streaming capabilities to process the streamed data. Design the PySpark job to read directly from Kinesis, apply necessary transformations, and write processed data to an optimized storage solution like Delta Lake for real-time queries. Implement visualization tools like AWS QuickSight or integrate with BI tools to create the dashboard. Ensure the system is fault-tolerant by setting up appropriate checkpoints and error handling in Spark.
    
  7. Disaster Recovery Planning for Data Engineering Solutions
    Your company needs a robust disaster recovery plan for its data engineering solutions built on AWS and Databricks. Outline your strategy for implementing disaster recovery.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    For disaster recovery, start by setting up AWS S3 cross-region replication to ensure data redundancy. Use AWS Backup to automate and manage backups of AWS resources. Implement database snapshots and backups for RDS and Redshift. In Databricks, regularly export critical configurations and notebooks. Use Databricks' REST API to automate the export and import of notebooks and clusters for recovery purposes. Test the disaster recovery plan regularly by simulating failures and ensuring that RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) are met. Document the recovery procedures and ensure all team members are trained on the recovery protocols.
  8. Handling Large-scale Data Migrations
    You are tasked with migrating large datasets from on-premises Hadoop clusters to AWS S3 and processing them in Databricks. Describe the approach you would take to ensure a smooth and efficient migration.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To handle large-scale data migrations from Hadoop to AWS S3 for processing in Databricks, I would:
    
    Data Transfer: Use AWS Direct Connect or AWS Snowball for efficient data transfer from on-premises to AWS S3.
    
    Data Format: Convert data to an optimized format like Parquet or ORC to reduce storage and increase processing efficiency.
    
    Security: Ensure data is encrypted during transfer and at rest in S3 using AWS KMS.
    
    Incremental Migration: Implement incremental data transfer to minimize downtime and validate data integrity.
    
    Validation: Use checksums and data validation techniques to ensure data consistency post-migration.
    
    Processing: Set up Databricks clusters to process the migrated data using PySpark and leverage Delta Lake for efficient data handling.
    
  9. Implementing Incremental Data Processing
    You are tasked with creating a PySpark job that processes only the new data added to a large dataset each day to optimize resource usage. Outline your approach for implementing incremental data processing.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    For incremental data processing in PySpark, I would use watermarking and windowing concepts. By leveraging structured streaming, I would set a watermark to handle late data and define a window for processing. For example: 
    df = df.withWatermark('timestamp', '1 day').groupBy(window('timestamp', '1 day')).agg(sum('value'))
    . Additionally, maintaining a 'last_processed' timestamp in persistent storage allows the job to query only new data each run, using filters like df.filter(df['event_time'] > last_processed_time). This ensures efficient and accurate incremental data processing.
  10. Splunk Data Model Acceleration
    You have been asked to accelerate a Splunk data model to improve the performance of Pivot reports. However, you need to ensure that the acceleration does not impact the system's overall performance. How would you approach this task?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To accelerate a Splunk data model, I would start by evaluating the data model's complexity and the frequency of the Pivot reports that rely on it. I would enable data model acceleration selectively, focusing on the most queried datasets. By setting an appropriate acceleration period that balances freshness with performance, I can minimize resource usage. Monitoring resource utilization and adjusting the acceleration settings as needed would help prevent impacts on overall system performance. Additionally, I would use Splunk's monitoring console to ensure the acceleration process is efficient and to identify any potential performance bottlenecks.
    
  11. Using Splunk for Log Correlation and Analysis
    You are tasked with correlating logs from multiple sources (e.g., application logs, database logs, and server logs) to troubleshoot a complex issue impacting application performance. Describe how you would leverage Splunk to perform this task effectively.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To correlate logs from multiple sources in Splunk, I would first ensure all logs are ingested and indexed properly with consistent timestamps across all sources. I would use field extractions to ensure that common identifiers, such as transaction IDs, are correctly parsed. By utilizing Splunk's 'join' command, I can correlate events from different sources based on these identifiers. Additionally, I would leverage the 'transaction' command to group related events into a single transaction. This helps in visualizing the entire lifecycle of a request across different systems, enabling effective troubleshooting. Lastly, I would create dashboards to visualize patterns and identify anomalies across the correlated logs.
  12. PySpark Window Functions
    Write a PySpark code snippet using window functions to calculate a running total of a `sales` column, partitioned by `region` and ordered by `date`. Assume you have a DataFrame with columns `date`, `region`, and `sales`.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
    from pyspark.sql.window import Window
    from pyspark.sql.functions import col, sum
    
    spark = SparkSession.builder.appName("Window Functions").getOrCreate()
    
    # Sample data
    data = [("2023-10-01", "North", 100), ("2023-10-02", "North", 200),
            ("2023-10-01", "South", 150), ("2023-10-02", "South", 250)]
    columns = ["date", "region", "sales"]
    df = spark.createDataFrame(data, columns)
    
    # Define window specification
    window_spec = Window.partitionBy("region").orderBy("date").rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.currentRow)
    
    # Calculate running total
    running_total_df = df.withColumn("running_total", sum(col("sales")).over(window_spec))
    
    # Show the result
    running_total_df.show()
    
  13. Optimizing PySpark Data Pipeline
    You have a PySpark data pipeline that processes large datasets on a nightly basis. Recently, the processing time has increased significantly, impacting downstream applications. Describe how you would identify and resolve the bottlenecks in the pipeline.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To identify and resolve bottlenecks in a PySpark data pipeline, I would start by utilizing Spark's built-in UI to monitor jobs and stages to pinpoint slow tasks. Common areas to check include data skew, improper shuffling, and inefficient transformations. I would ensure that data is partitioned efficiently, possibly using `repartition` or `coalesce`. Additionally, I would leverage caching strategically to avoid recomputation of the same data. Code example: 
    df = df.repartition(10, 'key_column')
    . I would also review the logical plan using `df.explain()`, and optimize joins using broadcast joins with broadcast(df) where applicable.
    
  14. Implementing Data Quality Checks
    You are responsible for ensuring data quality in a Databricks pipeline that processes data from multiple sources. Describe the approach and tools you would use to implement data quality checks.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To ensure data quality in a Databricks pipeline, I would implement the following approach:
    
    Data Validation: Use PySpark to implement validation checks such as schema validation, null checks, and value range checks.
    
    Delta Lake: Utilize Delta Lake's schema enforcement feature to prevent schema mismatches.
    
    Data Profiling: Use tools like Great Expectations integrated with Databricks to profile data and set expectations for quality checks.
    
    Automated Testing: Implement automated tests for data validation as part of the CI/CD pipeline.
    
    Monitoring and Alerts: Integrate with Splunk to monitor data quality metrics and set up alerts for anomalies.

Data Engineer - Mphasis USA - Nov 19, 2025


See All: Miscellaneous Interviews @ FloCareer

  1. Optimizing Spark Jobs in Databricks
    You have a Spark job running in Databricks that processes terabytes of data daily. Recently, the processing time has increased significantly. You need to optimize the job to ensure it runs efficiently. Describe the steps and techniques you would use to diagnose and optimize the job performance.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To optimize the Spark job in Databricks, I would first use the Spark UI to analyze the job's execution plan and identify any bottlenecks. Key steps include:
    
    Data Skewness: Check for data skewness and repartition the data to ensure even distribution.
    
    Shuffle Partitions: Adjust the number of shuffle partitions based on the job's scale and cluster size.
    
    Cache and Persist: Use caching or persisting for intermediate datasets that are reused multiple times.
    
    Optimize Joins: Ensure that joins use the appropriate join strategy, such as broadcast joins for smaller datasets.
    
    Resource Allocation: Adjust the executor memory and cores based on workload requirements.
    
    Code Optimization: Review and refactor the Spark code to optimize transformations and actions, and use DataFrame/Dataset API for better optimization.
    
    Use Delta Lake: If applicable, use Delta Lake for ACID transactions and faster reads/writes.
    
  2. Handling Large-scale Data Migrations
    You are tasked with migrating large datasets from on-premises Hadoop clusters to AWS S3 and processing them in Databricks. Describe the approach you would take to ensure a smooth and efficient migration.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To handle large-scale data migrations from Hadoop to AWS S3 for processing in Databricks, I would:
    
    Data Transfer: Use AWS Direct Connect or AWS Snowball for efficient data transfer from on-premises to AWS S3.
    
    Data Format: Convert data to an optimized format like Parquet or ORC to reduce storage and increase processing efficiency.
    
    Security: Ensure data is encrypted during transfer and at rest in S3 using AWS KMS.
    
    Incremental Migration: Implement incremental data transfer to minimize downtime and validate data integrity.
    
    Validation: Use checksums and data validation techniques to ensure data consistency post-migration.
    
    Processing: Set up Databricks clusters to process the migrated data using PySpark and leverage Delta Lake for efficient data handling.
    
  3. Implementing Data Quality Checks
    You are responsible for ensuring data quality in a Databricks pipeline that processes data from multiple sources. Describe the approach and tools you would use to implement data quality checks.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To ensure data quality in a Databricks pipeline, I would implement the following approach:
    
    Data Validation: Use PySpark to implement validation checks such as schema validation, null checks, and value range checks.
    
    Delta Lake: Utilize Delta Lake's schema enforcement feature to prevent schema mismatches.
    
    Data Profiling: Use tools like Great Expectations integrated with Databricks to profile data and set expectations for quality checks.
    
    Automated Testing: Implement automated tests for data validation as part of the CI/CD pipeline.
    
    Monitoring and Alerts: Integrate with Splunk to monitor data quality metrics and set up alerts for anomalies.
    
  4. Alerting on Anomalies in Data Streams
    As a Data Engineer, you are responsible for setting up alerts in Splunk to detect anomalies in real-time data streams from IoT devices. How would you configure these alerts to minimize false positives while ensuring timely detection of true anomalies?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To configure alerts on IoT device data streams in Splunk, I would first establish a baseline of normal operating parameters using historical data analysis. This involves identifying key metrics and their usual ranges. I would then set up real-time searches with conditionals that trigger alerts when metrics fall outside these ranges. To minimize false positives, I would incorporate thresholds that account for expected variations and implement a machine learning model, such as a clustering algorithm, to dynamically adjust the thresholds. Additionally, I would set up multi-condition alerts that trigger only when multiple indicators of an anomaly are present.
    
  5. Handling Large Joins Efficiently
    You need to perform a join between two large datasets in PySpark. Explain how you would approach this to ensure optimal performance.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To handle large joins efficiently in PySpark, I would start by checking if one of the datasets is small enough to fit in memory and use a broadcast join with broadcast(small_df). If both are large, I would ensure they are partitioned on the join key using df.repartition('join_key'). Additionally, optimizing join strategies through spark.conf.set('spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold', -1) and leveraging sort-merge joins can be beneficial. Using df.explain() to review the physical plan helps in understanding and improving join strategies.
    
  6. Disaster Recovery Planning for Data Engineering Solutions
    Your company needs a robust disaster recovery plan for its data engineering solutions built on AWS and Databricks. Outline your strategy for implementing disaster recovery.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    For disaster recovery, start by setting up AWS S3 cross-region replication to ensure data redundancy. Use AWS Backup to automate and manage backups of AWS resources. Implement database snapshots and backups for RDS and Redshift. In Databricks, regularly export critical configurations and notebooks. Use Databricks' REST API to automate the export and import of notebooks and clusters for recovery purposes. Test the disaster recovery plan regularly by simulating failures and ensuring that RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) are met. Document the recovery procedures and ensure all team members are trained on the recovery protocols.
    
  7. PySpark Window Functions
    Write a PySpark code snippet using window functions to calculate a running total of a `sales` column, partitioned by `region` and ordered by `date`. Assume you have a DataFrame with columns `date`, `region`, and `sales`.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
    from pyspark.sql.window import Window
    from pyspark.sql.functions import col, sum
    
    spark = SparkSession.builder.appName("Window Functions").getOrCreate()
    
    # Sample data
    data = [("2023-10-01", "North", 100), ("2023-10-02", "North", 200),
            ("2023-10-01", "South", 150), ("2023-10-02", "South", 250)]
    columns = ["date", "region", "sales"]
    df = spark.createDataFrame(data, columns)
    
    # Define window specification
    window_spec = Window.partitionBy("region").orderBy("date").rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.currentRow)
    
    # Calculate running total
    running_total_df = df.withColumn("running_total", sum(col("sales")).over(window_spec))
    
    # Show the result
    running_total_df.show()
    
  8. Integrating Splunk for Monitoring AWS and Databricks Infrastructure
    Your company wants to leverage Splunk to monitor AWS and Databricks infrastructure. Describe how you would set up and configure Splunk for this purpose.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To integrate Splunk for monitoring, first deploy the Splunk Universal Forwarder on AWS EC2 instances to collect logs and metrics. Configure log forwarding from AWS CloudWatch to Splunk using AWS Lambda and Kinesis Firehose. Set up Splunk apps for AWS and Databricks to provide dashboards and analytics for infrastructure monitoring. Use Splunk's Machine Learning Toolkit to analyze trends and anomalies in real-time. Ensure proper access controls and encryption are set up for data sent to Splunk. Regularly update dashboards and alerts to reflect infrastructure changes and track key performance indicators (KPIs).
  9. Handling Data Ingestion Spikes in Splunk
    Your organization experiences occasional spikes in data ingestion due to seasonal events. These spikes sometimes lead to delayed indexing and processing in Splunk. How would you manage these spikes to maintain performance and data availability?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To handle data ingestion spikes in Splunk, I would first ensure that the indexing and search head clusters are appropriately scaled to accommodate peak loads. Implementing load balancing across indexers can help distribute the load more evenly. I'd configure indexer acknowledgment to ensure data persistence and prevent data loss during spikes. Using data retention policies, I can manage storage effectively without impacting performance. Additionally, I would consider implementing a queueing system to manage data bursts and prioritize critical data streams. Monitoring and alerting on queue lengths can also help in preemptively addressing potential bottlenecks.
  10. Partitioning Strategies in PySpark
    You have a large dataset that you need to store in a distributed file system, and you want to optimize it for future queries. Explain your approach to partitioning the data using PySpark.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To optimize a large dataset for future queries using partitioning in PySpark, I would partition the data based on frequently queried columns, using df.write.partitionBy('column_name').parquet('path/to/save'). This technique reduces data scan during query execution. Choosing the right partition column typically involves domain knowledge and query patterns analysis. Additionally, ensuring that partition keys have a balanced distribution of data helps avoid partition skew. The data can also be bucketed with bucketBy(numBuckets, 'column_name') if needed for more efficient joins.
  11. Handling Data Security in AWS and Databricks
    Your organization is dealing with sensitive data, and you need to ensure its security across AWS services and Databricks. What are the best practices you would implement to secure data?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To secure sensitive data, implement encryption at rest and in transit using AWS Key Management Service (KMS) for S3 and other AWS services. Use AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to enforce strict access controls, implementing least privilege principles. Enable logging and monitoring with AWS CloudTrail and CloudWatch to track access and modifications to data. In Databricks, use table access controls and secure cluster configurations to restrict data access. Regularly audit permissions and access logs to ensure compliance with security policies. Implement network security best practices like VPCs, security groups, and endpoint policies.
  12. Data Cleaning and Transformation
    You are provided with a dataset that contains several missing values and inconsistent data formats. Describe how you would clean and transform this dataset using PySpark.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To clean and transform a dataset with missing values and inconsistent formats in PySpark, I would first identify null values using df.select([count(when(col(c).isNull(), c)).alias(c) for c in df.columns]). For missing data, I might use df.fillna() for imputation or df.dropna() to remove rows. For inconsistent formats, such as dates, I would use to_date(df['date_column'], 'MM-dd-yyyy') to standardize. Additionally, using regexp_replace() can help clean strings. Finally, I would apply transformations like withColumn() to derive new columns or selectExpr() for SQL-like transformations.
  13. Optimizing Splunk Search Performance
    Your team has been experiencing slow search performance in Splunk, especially during peak hours. You are tasked with optimizing the search queries to improve performance without reducing data granularity or the volume of data being processed. What steps would you take to achieve this?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To optimize Splunk search performance, I would first review the existing search queries for inefficiencies. I would ensure that they are using search time modifiers like 'earliest' and 'latest' to limit the time range being queried. I would also evaluate the use of 'where' versus 'search' commands, as 'search' is generally more efficient. Additionally, I would implement summary indexing for frequently accessed datasets to reduce the need for full data scans. Evaluating and potentially increasing hardware resources during peak hours could also be considered. Finally, I would use Splunk's job inspector to identify slow search components and optimize them accordingly.
  14. RATE CANDIDATE'S SKILLS
    Databricks
    AWS
    PySpark
    Splunk
    

Python FASTAPI - Impetus - 4 yoe - Nov 19, 2025


See All: Miscellaneous Interviews @ FloCareer

  1. Data Validation with Pydantic
    How does FastAPI leverage Pydantic for data validation, and why is it beneficial?
    
    FastAPI uses Pydantic models for data validation and serialization. Pydantic allows defining data schemas with Python type annotations, and it performs runtime data validation and parsing. For example, you can define a Pydantic model as follows:
    from pydantic import BaseModel
    
    class Item(BaseModel):
        name: str
        price: float
        is_offer: bool = None
    When a request is made, FastAPI automatically validates the request data against this model. This ensures that only correctly structured data reaches your application logic, reducing errors and improving reliability.
            
  2. Implementing Workflow Rules in FastAPI
    How would you implement workflow rules in a FastAPI application using a rules engine or library?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    Implementing workflow rules in FastAPI can be done using libraries like Temporal or Azure Logic Apps. Temporal provides a framework for defining complex workflows in code with features like retries and timers. In FastAPI, you can define a workflow as a series of tasks executed in a specific order:
    from temporalio import workflow
    
    @workflow.defn(name='my_workflow')
    class MyWorkflow:
        @workflow.run
        async def run(self, param: str) -> str:
            result = await some_async_task(param)
            return result
    Using a rules engine allows for separation of business logic from application code, improving maintainability and scalability.
            
  3. Understanding Python Decorators
    Explain how decorators work in Python. Provide an example of a custom decorator that logs the execution time of a function.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    Python decorators are a powerful tool that allows you to modify the behavior of a function or class method. A decorator is a function that takes another function as an argument and extends or alters its behavior. Decorators are often used for logging, enforcing access control and authentication, instrumentation, and caching.
    
    Here is an example of a custom decorator that logs the execution time of a function:
    
    ```python
    import time
    
    def execution_time_logger(func):
        def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
            start_time = time.time()
            result = func(*args, **kwargs)
            end_time = time.time()
            print(f"Execution time of {func.__name__}: {end_time - start_time} seconds")
            return result
        return wrapper
    
    @execution_time_logger
    def sample_function():
        time.sleep(2)
        return "Function executed"
    
    sample_function()
    ```
    
    In this example, `execution_time_logger` is a decorator that prints the time taken by `sample_function` to execute. The `wrapper` function inside the decorator captures the start and end times and calculates the execution time, printing the result.
            
  4. Designing REST APIs with FastAPI
    How would you design a REST API using FastAPI for a simple online bookstore application? Describe the main components and endpoints you would create.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    To design a REST API for an online bookstore using FastAPI, you would start by identifying the main resources: books, authors, and orders. Each resource would have its own endpoint. For example, '/books' would handle book-related operations. You would use FastAPI's path operation decorators to define routes like GET '/books' to retrieve all books, POST '/books' to add a new book, GET '/books/{id}' to get a specific book, PUT '/books/{id}' to update a book, and DELETE '/books/{id}' to remove a book. FastAPI's automatic data validation using Pydantic models ensures that the request and response bodies are correctly formatted.
            
  5. Problem Solving in Software Development
    Discuss a challenging problem you encountered in a Python FastAPI project and how you resolved it. What was your thought process and which tools or techniques did you use?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    In a recent FastAPI project, I encountered a performance bottleneck due to synchronous database queries in a high-traffic endpoint. The solution involved refactoring the code to use asynchronous database operations with `asyncpg` and `SQLAlchemy`. My thought process was to first identify the problematic areas using profiling tools like cProfile and Py-Spy to pinpoint the slowest parts of the application. Once identified, I researched best practices for async programming in Python and implemented changes. I also set up load testing with tools like Locust to verify the improvements. This approach not only resolved the performance issue but also increased the overall responsiveness of the application.
            
  6. 
    Testing REST APIs
    Explain how you would test a REST API developed with FastAPI. What tools and strategies would you use?
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    Testing a REST API developed with FastAPI involves writing unit and integration tests to ensure the correctness and reliability of the API. You can use the 'pytest' framework for writing tests and 'httpx' for making HTTP requests in the test environment. FastAPI's 'TestClient' allows you to simulate requests to your API endpoints without running a live server. You should test various scenarios, including valid and invalid inputs, to ensure that your API behaves as expected. Mocking external services and databases can help isolate the API logic during testing.
            
  7. Asynchronous Background Tasks
    In FastAPI, implement an endpoint that triggers a background task to send an email. Assume the email sending is a mock function that prints to the console.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    from fastapi import FastAPI, BackgroundTasks
    
    app = FastAPI()
    
    def send_email(email: str, message: str):
        print(f"Sending email to {email}: {message}")
    
    @app.post("/send-email/")
    async def send_email_endpoint(email: str, message: str, background_tasks: BackgroundTasks):
        background_tasks.add_task(send_email, email, message)
        return {"message": "Email sending in progress"}
    
  8. File Upload Endpoint
    Create an endpoint in FastAPI that allows users to upload files. The files should be saved to a directory on the server.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    from fastapi import FastAPI, File, UploadFile
    import os
    
    app = FastAPI()
    UPLOAD_DIRECTORY = './uploads/'
    os.makedirs(UPLOAD_DIRECTORY, exist_ok=True)
    
    @app.post("/uploadfile/")
    async def create_upload_file(file: UploadFile = File(...)):
        file_location = os.path.join(UPLOAD_DIRECTORY, file.filename)
        with open(file_location, "wb") as f:
            f.write(await file.read())
        return {"info": f"file '{file.filename}' saved at '{UPLOAD_DIRECTORY}'"}
    
  9. Asynchronous Programming in FastAPI
    Discuss how FastAPI supports asynchronous programming and the advantages it provides.
    Ideal Answer (5 Star)
    FastAPI supports asynchronous programming natively, utilizing Python's async and await keywords. This allows the server to handle multiple requests simultaneously, making it highly efficient and capable of supporting a large number of concurrent users. Asynchronous programming is especially beneficial for I/O-bound operations, such as database queries and external API calls. For instance, an async function in FastAPI might look like this:
    @app.get('/async-endpoint')
    async def async_endpoint():
        await some_async_io_operation()
        return {"message": "Async operation complete"}
    This non-blocking nature can significantly improve the throughput of web applications.
    
  10. RATE CANDIDATE'S SKILLS
    Python
    FAST API
    REST API
    

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Corruption and Greed


My Meditations

Well, everyone on face agrees that “corruption” and “greed” two are bad. And actually “Everyone” is an overstatement, so let's say “most of us”.

Let's be controversial for a moment and allow me present to you two people who view “corruption” and “greed” positively. 

Dhruv Agarwal and Rohit Sud.

Dhruv Agarwal was my Tech Lead at Mobileum (something like 2015-2018).
Dhruv was doing a distance-education degree in MBA (Strategic Leadership) from IIM Lucknow. He used to board the office cab from Saket till Sector 48, Gurugram. That was about an hour long ride.

One point I remember he used to make was his stand for corruption as a positive driver of economics and society.   

He used to say “if everything was priced fairly, there would no incentive for anyone to make extra efforts in accomplishing anything. The money that's passed under the table is an opportunity for people to make something extra”.

Secondly, he used to say that “if society was fare and just, and there were equal opportunities, then what does that translate to in a country with over a billion strong population. So basically, corruption is the tool by which you can expedite your case ahead of others in this pool of people for some extra bucks.”

~~~

Rohit is my old friend, know him since my school days. He would sometimes call me to cheer me up and to give me some gyaan on whatever problems I would be facing at the moment. 

On one such calls, he advocated for “Greed and Corruption”. 

So he told me this story: He visits a neighborhood barber's shop for getting a hair cut or hair do. And there after the service person (among 2-3 young men who work there) finishes his job, Rohit pays him 20 Rupees tip apart from the service charge. And next time when Rohit goes there, at first, there would be a race and excitement in those young men to serve Rohit. The service person would ask Rohit for tea or coffee, and make Rohit feel like a king (for the moment). All that for just 20 Rupees.

On the contrary, when I (till now) used to take any service, I would not pay any tip. On top of that, I would be bargaining for a lower price. And now here was my friend giving me gyaan on how to use greed, corruption and poverty of this country to our advantage.

~~~

The reason I am writing about 'Corruption and Greed' today is because I encountered how Uber drivers were trying to make a couple extra bucks out of Uber users by fooling them in one way or the other.

Way 1: The Uber driver would refuse to pay tolls out of his pocket and would ask you to pay for tolls. And let me tell you – sometimes the drivers seek for this toll money and other times they don't. Simple meaning – this ask for toll money from a bad bunch of drivers is illegitimate. 
FYI: I travel between Inderlok, Delhi and Sector 79, Gurugram often.

Way 2: At the end of the ride, before the driver would close the ride, he would ask you how much money was the Uber app was showing when you booked the ride, and would ask you pay that much.
“Not closing the ride” on the spot is an important step for them, because otherwise actual amount would reflect on his and your screen. 
Note: The predicted amount that shows in Uber app at the time of booking a ride is higher than the actual amount at the end of the ride.

Way 3: This happened to me to once around 10-14 days back. And then I also learned it's fix.
At the end of the ride, the driver showed me an invoice for a trip that was booked for some 65 Rupees. And the invoice said something like 130 (with all the tax calculation).

The way out of it is ask the driver to close the ride and then open the “Activities” section in the Uber app, it would show all the past ride details and how much you were supposed to pay for that ride.

Way 4: The driver might take an extra longer (in terms of miles) route and would make extra money for the extra distance.

~~~

Now, I don't want to leave you hanging there but I will draw a conclusion to this debate some other day. Right now, it is getting late and I need to go to sleep.

PS: I am reading (60% done) a great Chetan Bhagat book “Revolution 2020: Love, Corruption, And Ambition”

Monday, December 8, 2025

AI’s Next Phase -- Specialization, Scaling, and the Coming Agent Platform Wars -- Mistral 3 vs DeepSeek 3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5


See All Articles on AI

As 2025 comes to a close, the AI world is doing the opposite of slowing down. In just a few weeks, we’ve seen three major model launches from different labs:

  • Mistral 3

  • DeepSeek 3.2

  • Claude Opus 4.5

All three are strong. None are obviously “bad.” That alone is a big shift from just a couple of years ago, when only a handful of labs could credibly claim frontier-level models.

But the interesting story isn’t just that everything is good now.

The real story is this:

AI is entering a phase where differentiation comes from specialization and control over platforms, not just raw model quality.

We can see this in three places:

  1. How Mistral, DeepSeek, and Anthropic are carving out different strengths.

  2. How “scaling laws” are quietly becoming “experimentation laws.”

  3. How Amazon’s move against ChatGPT’s shopping agent signals an emerging platform war around agents.

Let’s unpack each.


1. Mistral vs. DeepSeek vs. Claude: When Everyone Is Good, What Makes You Different?

On paper, the new Mistral and DeepSeek releases look like they’re playing the same game: open models, strong benchmarks, competitive quality.

Under the hood, they’re leaning into very different philosophies.

DeepSeek 3.2: Reasoning and Sparse Attention for Agents

DeepSeek has become synonymous with novel attention mechanisms and high-efficiency large models. The 3.2 release extends that trend with:

  • Sparse attention techniques that help big models run more efficiently.

  • A strong emphasis on reasoning-first performance, especially around:

    • Tool use

    • Multi-step “agentic” workflows

    • Math and code-heavy tasks

If you squint, DeepSeek is trying to be “the reasoning lab”:

If your workload is complex multi-step thinking with tools, we want to be your default.

Mistral 3: Simple Transformer, Strong Multimodality, Open Weights

Mistral takes almost the opposite architectural route.

  • No flashy linear attention.

  • No wild new topology.

  • Just a dense, relatively “plain” transformer — tuned very well.

The innovation is in how they’ve packaged the lineup:

  • Multimodal by default across the range, including small models.

  • You can run something like Mistral 3B locally and still get solid vision + text capabilities.

  • That makes small, on-device, multimodal workflows actually practical.

The message from Mistral is:

You don’t need a giant proprietary model to do serious multimodal work. You can self-host it, and it’s Apache 2.0 again, not a bespoke “research-only” license.

Claude Opus 4.5: From Assistant to Digital Worker

Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.5 sits more on the closed, frontier side of the spectrum. Its differentiation isn’t just capabilities, but how it behaves as a collaborator.

A few emerging themes:

  • Strong focus on software engineering, deep code understanding, and long-context reasoning.

  • A growing sense of “personality continuity”:

    • Users report the model doing natural “callbacks” to earlier parts of the conversation.

    • It feels less like a stateless chat and more like an ongoing working relationship.

  • Framed by Anthropic as more of a “digital worker” than a simple assistant:

    • Read the 200-page spec.

    • Propose changes.

    • Keep state across a long chain of tasks.

If DeepSeek is leaning into reasoning, and Mistral into open multimodal foundations, Claude is leaning into:

“Give us your workflows and we’ll embed a digital engineer into them.”

The Big Shift: Differentiation by Domain, Not Just Quality

A few years ago, the question was: “Which model is the best overall?”

Now the better question is:

“Best for what?”

  • Best for local multimodal tinkering? Mistral is making a strong case.

  • Best for tool-heavy reasoning and math/code? DeepSeek is aiming at that.

  • Best for enterprise-grade digital teammates? Claude wants that slot.

This is how the “no moat” moment is resolving:
When everyone can make a good general model, you specialize by domain and workflow, not just by raw benchmark scores.


2. Are Scaling Laws Still a Thing? Or Are We Just Scaling Experimentation?

A recent blog post from VC Tomas Tunguz reignited debate about scaling laws. His claim, paraphrased: Gemini 3 shows that the old scaling laws are still working—with enough compute, we still get big capability jumps.

There’s probably some truth there, but the nuance matters.

Scaling Laws, the Myth Version

The “myth” version of scaling laws goes something like:

“Make the model bigger. Feed it more data. Profit.”

If that were the full story, only the labs with the most GPUs (or TPUs) would ever meaningfully advance the frontier. Google, with deep TPU integration, is the clearest example: it has “the most computers that ever computed” and the tightest hardware–software stack.

But that’s not quite what seems to be happening.

What’s Really Scaling: Our Ability to Experiment

With Gemini 3, Google didn’t massively increase parameters relative to Gemini 1.5. The improvements likely came from:

  • Better training methods

  • Smarter data curation and filtering

  • Different mixtures of synthetic vs human data

  • Improved training schedules and hyperparameters

In other words, the action is shifting from:

“Make it bigger” → to → “Train it smarter.”

The catch?
Training smarter still requires a lot of room to experiment. When:

  • One full-scale training run costs millions of dollars, and

  • Takes weeks or months,

…you can’t explore the space of training strategies very fully. There’s a huge hyperparameter and design space we’ve barely touched, simply because it’s too expensive to try things.

That leads to a more realistic interpretation:

Scaling laws are quietly turning into experimentation laws.

The more compute you have, the more experiments you can run on:

  • architecture

  • training data

  • curricula

  • optimization tricks
    …and that’s what gives you better models.

From this angle, Google’s big advantage isn’t just size—it’s iteration speed at massive scale. As hardware gets faster, what really scales is how quickly we can search for better training strategies.


3. Agents vs Platforms: Amazon, ChatGPT, and the New Walled Gardens

While models are getting better, a different battle is playing out at the application layer: agents.

OpenAI’s Shopping Research agent is a clear example of the agent vision:

“Tell the agent what you need. It goes out into the world, compares products, and comes back with recommendations.”

If you think “online shopping,” you think Amazon. But Amazon recently took a decisive step:
It began blocking ChatGPT’s shopping agent from accessing product detail pages, review data, and deals.

Why Would Amazon Block It?

You don’t need a conspiracy theory to answer this. A few obvious reasons:

  • Control over the funnel
    Amazon doesn’t want a third-party agent sitting between users and its marketplace.

  • Protection of ad and search economics
    Product discovery is where Amazon makes a lot of money.

  • They’re building their own AI layers
    With things like Alexa+ and Rufus, Amazon wants its own assistants to be the way you shop.

In effect, Amazon is saying:

“If you want to shop here, you’ll use our agent, not someone else’s.”

The Deeper Problem: Agents Need an Open Internet, but the Internet Is Not Open

Large-language-model agents rely on a simple assumption:

“They can go out and interact with whatever site or platform is needed on your behalf.”

But the reality is:

  • Cloudflare has started blocking AI agents by default.

  • Amazon is blocking shopping agents.

  • Many platforms are exploring paywalls or tollbooths for automated access.

So before we hit technical limits on what agents can do, we’re hitting business limits on where they’re allowed to go.

It raises an uncomfortable question:

Can we really have a “universal agent” if every major platform wants to be its own closed ecosystem?

Likely Outcome: Agents Become the New Apps

The original dream:

  • One personal agent

  • Talks to every service

  • Does everything for you across the web

The likely reality:

  • You’ll have a personal meta-agent, but it will:

    • Call Amazon’s agent for shopping

    • Call your bank’s agent for finance

    • Call your airline’s agent for travel

  • Behind the scenes, this will look less like a single unified agent and more like:

    “A multi-agent OS for your life, glued together by your personal orchestrator.”

In other words, we may not be escaping the “app world” so much as rebuilding it with agents instead of apps.


The Big Picture: What Phase Are We Entering?

If you zoom out, these threads are connected:

  1. Models are converging on “good enough,” so labs specialize by domain and workflow.

  2. Scaling is shifting from “make it bigger” to “let us run more experiments on architectures, data, and training.”

  3. Agents are bumping into platform economics and control, not just technical feasibility.

Put together, it suggests we’re entering a new phase:

From the Open Frontier Phase → to the Specialization and Platform Phase.

  • Labs will succeed by owning specific domains and developer workflows.

  • The biggest performance jumps may come from training strategy innovation, not parameter count.

  • Agent ecosystems will reflect platform power struggles as much as technical imagination.

The excitement isn’t going away. But the rules of the game are changing—from who can train the biggest model to who can:

  • Specialize intelligently

  • Experiment fast

  • Control key platforms

  • And still give users something that feels like a single, coherent AI experience.

That’s the next frontier.

Tags: Artificial Intelligence,Technology,

Where We Stand on AGI: Latest Developments, Numbers, and Open Questions


See All Articles on AI

Executive summary (one line)

Top models have made rapid, measurable gains (e.g., GPT‑5 reported around 50–70% on several AGI-oriented benchmarks), but persistent, hard-to-solve gaps — especially durable continual learning, robust multimodal world models, and reliable truthfulness — mean credible AGI timelines still range from a few years (for narrow definitions) to several decades (for robust human‑level generality). Numbers below are reported by labs and studies; where results come from internal tests or single groups I flag them as provisional.

Quick snapshot of major recent headlines

  • OpenAI released GPT‑5 (announced Aug 7, 2025) — presented as a notable step up in reasoning, coding and multimodal support (press release and model paper reported improvements).
  • Benchmarks and expert studies place current top models roughly “halfway” to some formal AGI definitions: a ten‑ability AGI framework reported GPT‑4 at 27% and GPT‑5 at 57% toward its chosen AGI threshold (framework authors’ reported scores).
  • Some industry/academic reports and panels (for example, an MIT/Arm deep dive) warn AGI‑like systems might appear as early as 2026; other expert surveys keep median predictions later (many 50%‑probability dates clustered around 2040–2060).
  • Policy and geopolitics matter: RAND (modeling reported Dec 1, 2025) frames the US–China AGI race as a prisoner’s dilemma — incentives favor speed absent stronger international coordination and verification.

Methods and definitions (short)

What “AGI score” means here: the draft uses several benchmarking frameworks that combine multiple task categories (reasoning, planning, perception, memory, tool use). Each framework weights abilities differently and maps aggregate performance to a 0–100% scale relative to an internal "AGI threshold" chosen by its authors. These mappings are normative — not universally agreed — so percentages should be read as framework‑specific progress indicators, not absolute measures of human‑level general intelligence.

Provenance notes: I flag results as (a) published/peer‑reviewed, (b) public benchmark results, or (c) reported/internal tests by labs. Where items are internal or single‑lab reports they are provisional and should be independently verified before being used as firm evidence.

Benchmarks and headline numbers (compact table)

BenchmarkWhat it measuresModel / ScoreHuman baseline / NotesSource type
Ten‑ability AGI framework Aggregate across ~10 cognitive abilities GPT‑4: 27% · GPT‑5: 57% Framework‑specific AGI threshold (authors' mapping) Reported framework scores (authors)
SPACE (visual reasoning subset) Visual reasoning tasks (subset) GPT‑4o: 43.8% · GPT‑5 (Aug 2025): 70.8% Human average: 88.9% Internal/public benchmark reports (reported)
MindCube Spatial / working‑memory tests GPT‑4o: 38.8% · GPT‑5: 59.7% Still below typical human average Benchmark reports (reported)
SimpleQA Hallucination / factual accuracy GPT‑5: hallucinations in >30% of questions (reported) Some other models (e.g., Anthropic Claude variants) report lower hallucination rates Reported / model vendor comparisons
METR endurance test Sustained autonomous task performance GPT‑5.1‑Codex‑Max: ~2 hours 42 minutes · GPT‑4: few minutes Measures autonomous chaining and robustness over time Internal lab test (provisional)
IMO 2025 (DeepMind Gemini, "Deep Think" mode) Formal math problem solving under contest constraints Solved 5 of 6 problems within 4.5 hours (gold‑level performance reported) Shows strong formal reasoning in a constrained task Reported by DeepMind (lab result)

Where models still struggle (the real bottlenecks)

  • Continual learning / long‑term memory: Most models remain effectively "frozen" after training; reliably updating and storing durable knowledge over weeks/months remains unsolved and is widely cited as a high‑uncertainty obstacle.
  • Multimodal perception (vision & world models): Text and math abilities have improved faster than visual induction and physical‑world modeling; visual working memory and physical plausibility judgments still lag humans.
  • Hallucinations and reliable retrieval: High‑confidence errors persist (SimpleQA >30% hallucination reported for GPT‑5 in one test); different model families show substantial variance.
  • Low‑latency tool use & situated action: Language is fast; perception‑action loops and real‑world tool use (robotics) remain harder and slower.

How researchers think we’ll get from here to AGI

Two broad routes dominate discussion:

  1. Scale current methods: Proponents argue more parameters, compute and better data will continue yielding returns. Historical training‑compute growth averaged ~4–5×/year (with earlier bursts up to ~9×/year until mid‑2020).
  2. New architectures / breakthroughs: Others (e.g., prominent ML researchers) argue scaling alone won’t close key gaps and that innovations (robust world models, persistent memory systems, tighter robotics integration) are needed.

Compute projections vary: one analysis (Epoch AI) suggested training budgets up to ~2×10^29 FLOPs could be feasible by 2030 under optimistic assumptions; other reports place upper bounds near ~3×10^31 FLOPs depending on power and chip production assumptions.

Timelines: why predictions disagree

Different metrics, definitions and confidence levels drive wide disagreement. Aggregated expert surveys show medians often in the 2040–2060 range, while some narrow frameworks and industry estimates give earlier dates (one internal framework estimated 50% by end‑2028 and 80% by end‑2030 under its assumptions). A minority of experts and some industry reports have suggested AGI‑like capabilities could appear as early as 2026. When using these numbers, note the underlying definition of AGI, which benchmark(s) are weighted most heavily, and whether the estimate is conditional on continued scaling or a specific breakthrough.

Risks, governance and geopolitics

  • Geopolitics: RAND models (Dec 1, 2025 reporting) show a prisoner’s dilemma: nations face incentives to accelerate unless international verification and shared risk assessments improve.
  • Security risks: Reports warn of misuse (e.g., advances in bio‑expertise outputs), espionage, and supply‑chain chokepoints (chip export controls and debates around GPU access matter for pace of progress).
  • Safety strategies: Proposals range from technical assurance and transparency to verification regimes and deterrence ideas; all face verification and observability challenges.
  • Ethics and law: Active debates continue over openness, liability, and model access control (paywalls vs open releases).

Bottom line for students (and what to watch)

Progress is real and measurable: top models now match or beat humans on many narrow tasks, have larger context windows, and can sustain autonomous code writing for hours in some internal tests. But key human‑like capacities — durable continual learning, reliable multimodal world models, and trustworthy factuality — remain outstanding. Timelines hinge on whether these gaps are closed by continued scaling, a single breakthrough (e.g., workable continual learning), or new architectures. Policy and safety research must accelerate in parallel.

Watch these signals: AGI‑score framework updates, SPACE / IntPhys / MindCube / SimpleQA benchmark results, compute growth analyses (e.g., Epoch AI), major model releases (GPT‑5 and successors), METR endurance reports, and policy studies like RAND’s — and when possible, prioritize independently reproducible benchmark results over single‑lab internal tests.

References and sources (brief)

  • OpenAI GPT‑5 announcement — Aug 7, 2025 (model release/press materials; reported performance claims).
  • Ten‑ability AGI framework — authors’ reported scores for GPT‑4 (27%) and GPT‑5 (57%) (framework paper/report; framework‑specific mapping to AGI threshold).
  • SPACE visual reasoning subset results — reported GPT‑4o 43.8%, GPT‑5 (Aug 2025) 70.8%, human avg 88.9% (benchmark report / lab release; flagged as reported/internal where applicable).
  • MindCube spatial/working‑memory benchmark — reported GPT‑4o 38.8%, GPT‑5 59.7% (benchmark report).
  • SimpleQA factuality/hallucination comparison — GPT‑5 reported >30% hallucination rate; other models (Anthropic Claude variants) report lower rates (vendor/benchmark reports).
  • METR endurance test — reported GPT‑5.1‑Codex‑Max sustained autonomous performance ~2 hours 42 minutes vs GPT‑4 few minutes (internal lab test; provisional).
  • DeepMind Gemini (’Deep Think’ mode) — reported solving 5 of 6 IMO 2025 problems within 4.5 hours (DeepMind report; task‑constrained result).
  • Epoch AI compute projection — suggested ~2×10^29 FLOPs feasible by 2030 under some assumptions; other reports give upper bounds up to ~3×10^31 FLOPs (compute projection studies).
  • RAND modeling of US–China race — reported Dec 1, 2025 (prisoner’s dilemma framing; policy analysis report).
  • Expert surveys and timeline aggregates — multiple surveys report medians often in 2040–2060 with notable variance (survey meta‑analyses / aggregated studies).

Notes: Where a result was described in the original draft as coming from “internal tests” or a single lab, I preserved the claim but flagged it above as provisional and recommended independent verification. For any use beyond classroom discussion, consult the original reports and benchmark datasets to confirm methodology, sample sizes, dates and reproducibility.

Tags: Artificial Intelligence,Technology,