EPF Scheme 2026: Modernisation Without Changing Your Core Benefits

See All Articles

5 Key Takeaways

• The EPF Scheme 2026 is a structural modernisation replacing the 1952 scheme, but core benefits (contribution rate, interest rate, withdrawal rules) remain unchanged.
• Digital services like online claims, e-passbooks, and digital inspections are now legally mandated, not just conveniences.
• Stricter governance rules for exempted private provident fund trusts, including trustee composition, electronic accounting, audits, and dematerialised investments.
• The central government gains temporary emergency power to reduce or defer EPF contributions during crises like pandemics, for a maximum of three months.
• The compliance framework is streamlined with clearer employer responsibilities, electronic filing, and stronger penalties for defaulters, while the Universal Account Number (UAN) and tax benefits stay the same.

---

What the New EPF Scheme 2026 Means for Your Provident Fund Savings

A comprehensive guide to understanding the structural overhaul — and why your savings remain secure.

---

If you are one of the millions of salaried employees in India, the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) is likely a cornerstone of your retirement planning. For decades, the rules governing this mandatory savings scheme were rooted in a framework established in 1952. That changed in July 2026, when the government officially notified the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 2026. It replaces the seven-decade-old 1952 version and brings the EPF ecosystem under the broader umbrella of the Code on Social Security, 2020. While the legal architecture has been overhauled, the day-to-day features that matter most to you — your contribution rate, interest rate, and withdrawal rules — remain completely unchanged.

This reform is not about altering the core benefits of your EPF account. Instead, it is a structural shift that codifies the digital transformation already underway at the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) and tightens the oversight of privately managed provident fund trusts. Understanding what has actually changed, and what has emphatically not, is key to navigating the new landscape with confidence.

A New Home Under the Social Security Code

Until now, the EPF scheme operated under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. With the notification of the 2026 scheme, it now derives its statutory power directly from the Code on Social Security, 2020. This codification consolidates multiple labour laws into a single, streamlined framework. For the existing EPF member, this transition is seamless. Your account balance, accumulated benefits, and service history continue without any disruption. There is no need to re-register, re-verify, or take any action. Your money and your records are safe, simply sitting under a more modern legal roof.

The Digital Framework Gets Legal Backbone

If you have filed an EPF claim online, checked your passbook on the UMANG app, or submitted a digital life certificate, you have already experienced the EPFO's digital services. The new scheme formally incorporates these capabilities into the rulebook, giving them statutory recognition. The EPF Scheme, 2026 explicitly mandates online filing of returns, electronic maintenance of records, digital member accounts, online claim submission, electronic annual statements, and even digital inspections. This means the paperless, presence-less experience you may already enjoy is no longer just a convenience offered by the organisation — it is now the legally prescribed standard. The push towards a fully digital ecosystem is expected to reduce processing times further and minimise human interface.

Stricter Governance for Exempted Trusts

One of the most significant substantive changes targets companies that manage their own provident fund trusts instead of depositing contributions directly with the EPFO. These are known as exempted establishments. The EPF Scheme, 2026 introduces a far more detailed governance framework for these trusts. The new rules spell out the eligibility and composition of trustees, mandate regular trustee meetings, and require electronic accounting and annual audits. Investments held by the trusts must be in dematerialised form, and there are now strict norms for investment reporting, online disclosures, and procedures for the renewal of exemptions. Penalties for delayed reporting have been tightened. In essence, the era of loosely governed private trusts is over; they must now operate with the same transparency and rigour expected of a regulated financial entity.

Emergency Powers to Adjust Contributions

A novel provision in the 2026 scheme grants the central government the ability to temporarily reduce or defer EPF contributions during exceptional circumstances. This power is strictly limited to events such as pandemics, epidemics, or national disasters, and can be exercised for a maximum period of three months. The intent is to provide a relief valve during acute crises, offering both employers and employees temporary breathing room without dismantling the permanent contribution structure. It is a targeted flexibility tool, not a backdoor to alter the core 12% contribution framework on a whim.

Compliance Framework Gets Sharper Teeth

Employers will also notice a more detailed compliance rulebook. The new scheme lays down clearer responsibilities for employers, standardises electronic filing timelines, formalises the procedure for the transfer of provident fund balances when an employee changes jobs, and enhances the accountability of exempted trusts. The inspection regime has been digitised as well. Together, these changes are designed to make compliance more straightforward for law-abiding establishments while making it harder for defaulters to slip through the cracks.

What Remains Exactly the Same

With all the talk of a new scheme, it is natural to worry about your money. The government has been explicit: the core financial parameters that define your EPF savings are untouched.

Your Contribution Rate

Employees will continue to contribute 12% of their basic wages towards EPF, and employers will match that with an equal 12%. Establishments that were previously notified for a lower 10% contribution rate continue to enjoy that reduced rate.

Voluntary Provident Fund (VPF)

The voluntary provident fund operates exactly as before. You can contribute more than the mandatory 12% through VPF, and your employer may also contribute more voluntarily, though they are not obligated to match your extra contribution.

Wage Ceiling & UAN

The wage ceiling for mandatory contributions remains the limit notified by the central government. If you are already covered under a valid joint option for contributions on a higher salary, that arrangement continues without disruption. The Universal Account Number (UAN) stays the permanent identification anchor for every EPF member. All services — from checking your balance to filing a transfer claim when you switch jobs — remain linked to this single number.

Interest Rate, Withdrawals & Tax Treatment

Most importantly, the EPF interest rate is not altered by this notification. Withdrawal rules, nomination provisions, the portability of balances across employers, and the favourable tax treatment of EPF contributions and withdrawals remain exactly as they were. The new scheme does not disturb any of these entitlements.

Why This Matters for the Layperson

For the average salaried individual, the takeaway is reassuring. The notification of the EPF Scheme, 2026 is a regulatory modernisation exercise, not a benefits revision. Your monthly statement will look the same, your eligibility to withdraw or take advances will follow the same rules, and the annual interest crediting process will proceed without change. The biggest difference you might notice over time is a smoother, faster digital experience when you interact with EPFO.

The stricter rules for exempted trusts provide a safety net for lakhs of employees whose provident funds are managed by their employers in-house. These employees often work for large, established organisations, but until now the quality of governance of those trusts varied. The new framework reduces the risk of mismanagement and brings those trusts in line with the best practices observed by the EPFO itself.

The emergency contribution adjustment clause, while a powerful tool, is ring-fenced. It can only be triggered by truly extraordinary national crises and for a short period. It is unlikely to affect your long-term retirement corpus, and any temporary deferral would be just that — temporary.

What Happens Next

With the legal foundation now in place, the focus shifts to implementation. The EPFO will likely issue detailed operational guidelines and technological upgrades to bring every process fully in line with the 2026 scheme. Employers, especially those running exempted trusts, must urgently review their governance structures and systems to meet the new standards. For the rest of us, the path forward involves no action at all — simply continuing to build our retirement savings within a framework that, while legally new, remains financially familiar.

In an era when regulatory change often sparks anxiety about reduced benefits or increased complexity, this transition stands out for its clarity. The government has modernised the plumbing of the EPF system without touching the water that flows through it. Your provident fund remains a secure, tax-efficient, and now digitally robust pillar of your long-term financial well-being.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or legal advice. Readers are encouraged to consult the official EPFO notifications and their financial advisors for guidance specific to their circumstances.

Read more

China’s GLM-5.2: The Mini DeepSeek Moment Redrawing the Global AI Map

See All Articles

5 Key Takeaways

• GLM-5.2 matches performance of top Western AI models like Claude and GPT at roughly one-sixth the cost.
• The model is open-weight, plug-and-play, drastically lowering barriers to adoption for developers and businesses.
• Western enterprise adoption faces trust hurdles due to geopolitical concerns and data security, especially in regulated industries.
• Chinese AI models' global market share is growing, particularly in developing nations, reshaping the competitive landscape.
• The emergence of GLM-5.2 pressures U.S. policymakers and AI labs to balance regulation, maintain lead, and justify premium pricing.

---

Analysis

China's Z.ai Unleashes GLM-5.2: The 'Mini DeepSeek Moment' Redrawing the Global AI Map

 July 2025  10 min read

A quiet tremor is rippling through Silicon Valley, and its epicenter is Beijing. A little-known startup called Z.ai has released an artificial intelligence model that not only matches the performance of the West's most advanced systems but does so at a fraction of the price. The model, GLM-5.2, has surged to the top of independent leaderboards, earned praise from industry titans, and ignited a fresh debate over whether the United States is in danger of losing its edge in the technology that will define the coming decade.

It is a storyline that feels eerily familiar. In January 2025, the Chinese lab DeepSeek jolted global markets when it unveiled a reasoning model, R1, that rivaled OpenAI's best work while costing orders of magnitude less to train and run. The episode triggered a massive tech stock selloff and forced a wholesale rethink of the assumption that American AI supremacy was unassailable. Now, 18 months later, Z.ai's GLM-5.2 is provoking what many experts are calling a "mini DeepSeek moment."

A Model That Punches Above Its Weight

Z.ai, officially known as Zhipu AI, launched GLM-5.2 last month with relatively little fanfare. But among developers, the response was swift and electric. The model demonstrated coding and "agentic" capabilities—the ability to carry out complex, multi-step tasks with minimal human hand-holding—that put it within striking distance of Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's GPT series. What made the achievement particularly startling was the economics: GLM-5.2 operates at roughly one-sixth the cost of closed, frontier U.S. models like Claude and the GPT family.

The numbers on third-party platforms tell a clear story. On OpenRouter, a popular hub that lets developers access and compare different AI models, GLM-5.2 rapidly climbed the usage rankings, eventually leapfrogging Anthropic's models. On Artificial Analysis's large language model (LLM) intelligence leaderboard—a composite score that measures reasoning, coding, and general capability—GLM-5.2 sits at fifth place globally. Even more striking is its performance on Code Arena's front-end coding rankings, which test how well models can generate websites and user interfaces. There, it holds the second spot, behind only the most elite closed-source systems.

1/6 Cost vs. Frontier Models

#5 Global LLM Ranking

#2 Code Arena Leaderboard

13% Chinese LLM Market Share

These are not vanity metrics. They reflect real-world developer enthusiasm at a time when many businesses are groaning under the escalating, often unpredictable costs of running advanced AI. Closed-source agentic models, which can autonomously chain together multiple actions, tend to consume enormous numbers of tokens, the basic units by which AI usage is measured and billed. A capable open-weight alternative that costs significantly less to operate is, for many, a financial lifeline.

What the Experts Are Saying

The praise from high-profile corners of the tech world has been effusive. David Sacks, who served as President Donald Trump's artificial intelligence czar, addressed the development during a recent episode of the All-In podcast.

"We now have a Chinese open-weight model that is as good as the currently available models from OpenAI and Anthropic. It is just a tick below Opus 4.8 (from Anthropic) and right up there with GPT 5.5 (from OpenAI). We cannot afford to do things that slow our companies down."

Sacks' concerns were tied to a specific regulatory backdrop. Until this week, Anthropic's latest models, Fable and Mythos, faced export controls that limited their availability. Washington lifted those curbs on Tuesday, but the period of restriction—combined with delays in OpenAI's own public rollout of the much-anticipated GPT-5.6—created a window of opportunity that Z.ai was poised to exploit.

Other influential voices have chimed in. Sridhar Ramaswamy, CEO of the cloud data platform Snowflake, and venture capitalist Marc Andreessen have both publicly lauded GLM-5.2's abilities. Meanwhile, Brian Tse, founder and CEO of Concordia AI, a Beijing-based consultancy specializing in AI safety, framed the shift as a structural warning.

"The international developer community is increasingly aware that relying solely on proprietary, U.S.-based API models carries significant risk."

Diversification, in other words, is no longer a fringe strategy but a matter of resilience.

Why Open-Weight Matters

To understand the excitement, it helps to clarify what "open-weight" means. Traditional proprietary AI models from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are accessed only through paid application programming interfaces (APIs). The underlying parameters—the mathematical guts of the system—are kept secret. Open-weight models, by contrast, release those parameters to the public. Anyone can download, inspect, modify, and run the model on their own hardware or a cloud provider of their choice.

GLM-5.2's particular breakthrough is that it works remarkably well right out of the box. Tiezhen Wang, former Asia-Pacific lead at Hugging Face, a central hub for the open-source AI community, put it this way:

"The shift GLM-5.2 brings is that the open-source model has become a plug-and-play, out-of-the-box product. You just deploy the model and without doing any complex fine-tuning systems, it is in a highly usable, ready-to-use state. This drastically lowers the barrier to entry for open-source adoption."

That barrier has long been the Achilles' heel of open-weight AI. In the past, getting an open model to perform at the level of a polished commercial product required significant technical expertise, custom adjustments, and computing resources. GLM-5.2 appears to have narrowed that gap to almost nothing, at least for a substantial subset of business tasks.

Z.ai has not disclosed how much it spent to develop GLM-5.2. But in a reply to Elon Musk on X last month, the company's founder, Tang Jie, signalled that the startup's ambitions are not stopping here. Tang said Z.ai could produce a model on par with Anthropic's Fable before the first quarter of next year—a timeline that, if met, would represent a dramatic acceleration in Chinese frontier AI capability.

The Trust Hurdle: Can Western Enterprises Embrace It?

For all its technical merit, GLM-5.2 faces a formidable obstacle in cracking the Western enterprise market: trust. In regulated industries such as banking, cybersecurity, healthcare, and government services, data security is a non-negotiable priority. The idea of piping sensitive corporate or customer information through a model built by a Beijing-based company triggers deep institutional caution.

Wei Sun, principal AI analyst at Counterpoint Research, pointed to this cultural and regulatory divide. "In the EU and U.S., some clients, partners and regulated industries may simply be unwilling to accept Chinese models in their AI stack, regardless of technical performance or price," Sun said. The upgrading and migration of enterprise AI systems typically takes months, and risk-averse legal and compliance teams are likely to move slowly, if at all.

Not everyone believes these fears are entirely rational. Some security experts argue that when a Chinese model is deployed on a U.S.-based cloud provider's infrastructure or on a company's own private servers, the data never leaves the organization's controlled environment. From a technical standpoint, they say, the risk profile is comparable to using any third-party software. Still, perception is often reality in the corporate world, and the residue of geopolitical tension colors every decision.

The result is a two-speed adoption curve. Large, heavily regulated corporations are maintaining their reliance on established American vendors. But at the other end, technology startups and small- to medium-sized enterprises are moving much faster. For these smaller players, the calculus is straightforward: if a model delivers comparable performance at a sixth of the cost, the savings can free up budget for other innovations. They are less encumbered by lengthy procurement cycles and more willing to experiment.

A Shifting Global Map of AI Usage

The rise of GLM-5.2 fits into a broader pattern that researchers are only beginning to quantify. A report released earlier this year by the non-profit RAND Corporation, based on website traffic data across 135 countries, found that Chinese large language models' global market share jumped from just 3 percent to 13 percent in the two months following DeepSeek's R1 launch in early 2025. That spike revealed a pent-up demand for alternatives that were both capable and affordable.

Notably, the gains were most pronounced in developing nations and in countries that maintain close political and economic ties with Beijing. This suggests that price sensitivity and geopolitical alignment are jointly shaping the global AI landscape. While the United States and Western Europe remain strongholds for OpenAI and Anthropic, much of the rest of the world is increasingly willing to look eastward.

Poe Zhao, a China tech analyst and founder of the Hello China Tech newsletter, characterized the moment with an important nuance. "Developers tend to care less about where a model comes from than whether it works, how much it costs and whether they can deploy or access it reliably," Zhao said. He predicts that for most organizations, the shift will not be an abrupt "overnight replacement of OpenAI or Anthropic." Instead, we are likely to see "partial routing"—businesses using Chinese models for certain cost-sensitive or latency-insensitive workloads while keeping American models for others.

"So yes, it is a mini DeepSeek moment—but in a narrower, developer-centric sense."

What Happens Next?

The emergence of GLM-5.2 raises consequential questions for policymakers, business leaders, and the AI research community. For Washington, the challenge is to maintain a lead in frontier technology without imposing regulations that inadvertently hamstring domestic companies while foreign competitors race ahead. David Sacks' warning illustrates a growing anxiety that export controls and safety restrictions, however well-intentioned, can have unintended competitive side effects.

For American AI labs, the pressure is on to deliver not just marginally better performance but decisive, tangible value that justifies their premium pricing. If open-weight alternatives can replicate 90 percent of the capabilities at a fraction of the cost, the economic logic of closed-source dominance begins to fray. Expect to see aggressive price cuts, new efficiency-focused architectures, and a stronger push to embed proprietary models into sticky enterprise ecosystems where switching costs remain high.

For the rest of the world, GLM-5.2's reception signals that the AI race is no longer a two-horse affair. The proliferation of high-quality, affordable models from multiple countries is reshaping a market that once looked like a winner-take-all contest. That pluralism is, on balance, healthy for innovation—but it also complicates everything from supply-chain risk to international governance of AI safety standards.

Key Takeaway What makes the GLM-5.2 story so compelling is not simply that a Chinese company built a competitive model. It is the speed at which it ascended the ranks, the efficiency with which it was delivered, and the burgeoning evidence that the global developer community is ready to embrace alternatives when they are good enough. The mini DeepSeek moment may be narrow for now, but the ground it stands on is widening fast.

© 2025 — Analysis published for informational purposes. All trademarks and model names belong to their respective owners.

Read more