Kejriwal Backs Wangchuk’s Hunger Strike, Amplifying Ladakh’s Sixth Schedule Fight

See All Articles    « Previously

5 Key Takeaways

• Arvind Kejriwal extended support to Sonam Wangchuk's hunger strike and urged him to end it, planning a visit to Jantar Mantar.
• Ladakh's agitation demands inclusion under the Sixth Schedule, full statehood, dedicated parliamentary seats, and a Public Service Commission.
• Sonam Wangchuk, an education reformer and innovator, became the face of the movement after previous hunger strikes and government inaction.
• The protest stems from post-2019 revocation of Article 370, which left Ladakh as a Union Territory without a legislature, leading to fears of cultural and ecological erosion.
• Kejriwal's intervention highlights growing opposition solidarity and raises national questions about federalism, regional autonomy, and constitutional protections for distinct communities.

---

National Politics • Constitutional Rights

Kejriwal Backs Wangchuk's Ladakh Hunger Strike, Vows to Visit Jantar Mantar in Show of Solidarity

The AAP national convener urges the climate activist to end his fast unto death as the agitation for Sixth Schedule protections, statehood, and parliamentary representation for Ladakh enters a critical phase.

14 July 2026 New Delhi 12 min read

In a significant political development that underscores the growing national attention on the Ladakh agitation, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener and former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has extended his support to climate activist and education reformer Sonam Wangchuk. Kejriwal also issued an urgent appeal to Wangchuk to end his hunger strike, and announced that he would personally visit the protest site at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on Thursday at 5 p.m. to stand in solidarity with Wangchuk and the demonstrators.

The announcement brings yet another prominent opposition voice into a movement that has been steadily amplifying its call for constitutional safeguards for the Union Territory of Ladakh. Wangchuk, who has been on a fast unto death for several days, has become the human face of a long-simmering demand for the extension of the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution to the region, along with full statehood and dedicated parliamentary representation. Kejriwal's decision to publicly back the protest and his call for the hunger strike to be withdrawn signal both solidarity and a strategic effort to translate street-level dissent into actionable political dialogue.

The Roots of the Ladakh Agitation

To fully grasp the weight of this moment, one must trace the origins of the unrest that has brought Wangchuk and thousands of Ladakhis to the nation's capital. For decades, the people of Ladakh have harboured apprehensions about the preservation of their unique cultural identity, fragile ecology, and control over local resources. Those anxieties were dramatically sharpened on 5 August 2019, when the central government revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which had granted special autonomy to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. In the same sweep, the state was bifurcated into the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.

"The demand for Union Territory status had been a long-standing one, precisely to escape what many Ladakhis viewed as political marginalisation by a Kashmir-centric administration. However, the form in which that status was granted—a Union Territory without a legislative assembly—left the local population effectively without an elected platform to voice its concerns."

Ladakh, unlike its western neighbour, was carved out without a legislature of its own. For a region that had long felt neglected within the former Jammu and Kashmir state, this was a profoundly mixed outcome. The demand for Union Territory status had been a long-standing one, precisely to escape what many Ladakhis viewed as political marginalisation by a Kashmir-centric administration. However, the form in which that status was granted—a Union Territory without a legislative assembly—left the local population effectively without an elected platform to voice its concerns, make laws on local matters, or exercise democratic oversight over the administration. Every decision, from land use to employment policies, now rested with a Lieutenant Governor appointed by New Delhi.

In the immediate aftermath, a broad coalition of political, social, and religious organisations in Ladakh formed the Leh Apex Body (LAB) and the Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA), representing the Buddhist-majority Leh district and the Shia Muslim-majority Kargil district respectively. Despite their distinct demographic compositions, these groups came together with a unified charter of demands. They sought the inclusion of Ladakh under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, full statehood, the establishment of a Public Service Commission for local recruitment, and separate Lok Sabha seats for Leh and Kargil. The Sixth Schedule, currently applicable to tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram, provides for Autonomous District Councils with substantial legislative, executive, and judicial powers over land, forests, and local governance. For Ladakhis, it represented the strongest constitutional shield against demographic change, unregulated development, and the erosion of tribal customs.

When the demands were not met through negotiations, the agitation entered a new, more urgent phase. Mass protests, economic blockades, and symbolic marches became regular features of life in Ladakh. It is against this backdrop that Sonam Wangchuk, an internationally celebrated innovator and Magsaysay Award laureate, stepped into a leadership role, bringing his moral authority and non-violent philosophy to the movement.

Sonam Wangchuk: From Classroom to Protest Tent

Sonam Wangchuk is not a career politician. He is an engineer and educationist who founded the Students' Educational and Cultural Movement of Ladakh (SECMOL), an institution that revolutionised learning in the high-altitude desert by embracing local culture and practical problem-solving. His work inspired the character of Phunsukh Wangdu in the Bollywood blockbuster 3 Idiots, and he gained global recognition for inventing the Ice Stupa, an artificial glacier that helps farmers combat water scarcity in the cold desert. For many Indians, Wangchuk is a symbol of grassroots innovation and Gandhian simplicity.

His pivot to full-time activism came when he concluded that no amount of technical ingenuity could protect Ladakh's future if its people lacked the legal and political instruments to decide their own destiny. Wangchuk articulated a vision of a carbon-neutral, culturally vibrant Ladakh that could serve as a model of sustainable living for the world. But that vision, he argued, was incompatible with a governance structure in which outsiders could buy land, mega-corporations could extract resources, and local voices were systematically ignored.

In early 2023, Wangchuk embarked on a 66-day hunger strike, demanding that Ladakh be brought under the Sixth Schedule. The fast drew nationwide attention and ended only after the Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a high-powered committee to examine the demand. However, the committee's subsequent report and the government's response failed to convince the protest leaders that their core concerns would be addressed. Wangchuk and his supporters alleged that the process was a stalling tactic, and that the fundamental question of constitutional protection remained unanswered.

By the summer of 2026, the patience of the agitators wore thin. Wangchuk launched his latest indefinite hunger strike at Jantar Mantar, the iconic space for peaceful protest in the heart of the capital. His demands were unchanged: the immediate extension of the Sixth Schedule to Ladakh, statehood, and two parliamentary seats. The fast, undertaken in the sweltering heat of a Delhi July, rapidly became a focal point for civil society, drawing visits from students, activists, and now a prominent chief minister.

Kejriwal's Intervention

Arvind Kejriwal's announcement on 14 July marks a calculated and compassionate intervention. The AAP leader is no stranger to the power of a hunger strike as a political instrument. His own career was forged in the crucible of anti-corruption protests, and his administration in Delhi pioneered a model of governance centred on education, health, and citizen engagement. By urging Wangchuk to end his fast, Kejriwal is drawing on a shared vocabulary of peaceful protest while advocating for a transition from physical sacrifice to sustained political pressure.

In his statement, Kejriwal said he would visit Jantar Mantar on Thursday at 5 p.m. to extend his support to Wangchuk and the Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) protest. The CJP, a civil rights organisation, has been actively facilitating the Ladakh protest, providing a platform for the agitators and amplifying their constitutional demands. Kejriwal's choice to align himself with both Wangchuk and the CJP underscores a broader message: that the grievances of Ladakh cannot be dismissed as regional discontent but must be understood as a national concern touching the democratic fabric of India.

Crucially, Kejriwal's support does not come in isolation. It is part of a growing chorus of opposition leaders who have visited the protest site or issued statements of solidarity. While the central government has maintained that the high-powered committee's recommendations are being processed and that Ladakh's development is a priority, the prolonged hunger strike and the visible deterioration of Wangchuk's health have placed the Bharatiya Janata Party-led dispensation in a politically delicate spot. Ladakh, as a Union Territory without a legislature, is administered directly by the Centre, making the central government the sole point of accountability.

The Anatomy of the Demands

To appreciate why the Sixth Schedule looms so large in this confrontation, a brief legal primer is necessary. The Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, under Article 244(2), was originally designed to protect the tribal populations of the north-eastern states. It empowers the formation of Autonomous District and Regional Councils that can enact laws on matters such as land allotment, management of forests, regulation of shifting cultivation, inheritance of property, and marriage and divorce. These councils also have the authority to levy taxes, collect revenue, and run schools and hospitals. Crucially, they require the approval of the governor for certain legislative actions, but they remain a formidable layer of self-governance.

The Four Core Demands of the Ladakh Agitation

• Sixth Schedule Extension: Constitutional protection granting Autonomous District Councils legislative, executive, and judicial powers over land, forests, and local governance.
• Full Statehood: An elected legislature and chief minister answerable to the people of Ladakh, replacing direct rule by a Lieutenant Governor appointed from New Delhi.
• Separate Parliamentary Seats: Two dedicated Lok Sabha constituencies—one for Leh and one for Kargil—to ensure granular democratic representation for the region's diverse communities.
• Public Service Commission: A dedicated recruitment body for government jobs in Ladakh, addressing chronic youth unemployment and ensuring fair opportunities for local candidates.

For the people of Ladakh, the Sixth Schedule is seen as a bulwark against what they perceive as existential threats. The region's tribal population, including the Buddhist Bhoti-speaking communities of Leh and the Shia Muslim communities of Kargil, fears that without such safeguards, large-scale land acquisition by non-locals and aggressive commercial exploitation—particularly in mining, tourism, and infrastructure—will destroy the ecological balance and culture of the cold desert. The memory of the 2010 cloudburst and subsequent flash floods that devastated Leh, killing hundreds, remains a grim reminder of environmental vulnerability. A governance model that prioritises fast-tracked development over ecological sensitivity is, in their view, a recipe for disaster.

Statehood, the second major demand, is intrinsically linked to democratic representation. A full-fledged state would have its own elected legislature and chief minister, answerable to the people. Currently, Ladakh sends exactly one member to the Lok Sabha, a situation that protest leaders argue is insufficient for a region that spans nearly 60,000 square kilometres and is home to diverse ethnic and religious communities. The demand for two seats—one for Leh and one for Kargil—is a plea for more granular representation and for a political architecture that reflects the region's internal diversity.

The establishment of a Public Service Commission for Ladakh, another key demand, addresses the chronic unemployment that plagues educated Ladakhi youth. For years, there have been complaints that out-of-state candidates secure government jobs in Ladakh to which locals have had little opportunity to apply or compete for fairly. A dedicated commission would not only streamline the recruitment process but also strengthen the sense of ownership and administrative participation among the native population.

§ § §

Political Ramifications and the Road Ahead

Kejriwal's visit to Jantar Mantar, and his explicit call for Wangchuk to call off his fast, is likely to energise the protest while simultaneously opening a new channel of political negotiation. The AAP has a significant presence in Delhi and Punjab, but it has not been a major player in Ladakh's domestic politics. By taking a stand, Kejriwal is positioning his party as a champion of federalism and regional autonomy, a theme that resonates with his party's broader ideological pitch against what it describes as an over-centralised administration.

Whether the Centre will respond to this heightened political pressure remains an open question. In the past, the government has expressed its willingness to examine the demands, with the Ministry of Home Affairs holding multiple rounds of talks with the Leh Apex Body and the Kargil Democratic Alliance. The high-powered committee, chaired by Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai, submitted its recommendations, but the details were never fully disclosed to the satisfaction of the protest leaders. They have consistently maintained that only a legally enforceable constitutional amendment applying the Sixth Schedule will suffice, and that mere administrative assurances or executive orders are not adequate shields against the pressures of majoritarian democracy.

There is also the delicate matter of Kargil, which has historically maintained a distinct set of concerns from Leh, even as the two districts stand united in this protest. The Kargil Democratic Alliance has backed the same core demands, but some voices within the Shia Muslim community have sought additional safeguards for religious and linguistic minorities. The unity of the LAB and KDA has been a powerful symbol of inter-communal harmony, a rare sight in a country often fragmented along religious lines. Kejriwal's public support will be interpreted as an endorsement of that harmony and of the principle that India's multicultural fabric requires deliberate constitutional protection.

"If Ladakh, with its compelling ecological and cultural arguments, cannot secure Sixth Schedule protections, what hope remains for other tribal and distinct communities that fear being subsumed by the homogenising forces of majoritarian politics?"

From a humanitarian perspective, the most pressing immediate concern is the health of Sonam Wangchuk. A hunger strike, particularly one undertaken by a 59-year-old in the punishing Delhi summer, carries serious medical risks. Kejriwal's appeal to end the strike is therefore not just political; it is a recognition that the physical toll on an individual of Wangchuk's stature would be a profound loss for the nation. Wangchuk's response to that appeal will be closely watched. In the past, he has refused to call off his fast without a concrete written commitment from the government. His supporters say the ball is squarely in the Centre's court.

The broader implications extend far beyond Ladakh. The agitation has become a test case for how the Indian republic accommodates regions with small populations, fragile ecologies, and distinct cultural identities. It raises stark questions about the architecture of Union Territories in an era where centralisation is increasingly the norm. If Ladakh, with its compelling ecological and cultural arguments, cannot secure Sixth Schedule protections, what hope remains for other tribal and distinct communities that fear being subsumed by the homogenising forces of majoritarian politics? Kejriwal's intervention, echoed by other regional parties, signals that the federal question is back on the national agenda. The coming days at Jantar Mantar will reveal whether this moral and political pressure can translate into a concrete breakthrough—or whether the impasse will only deepen, with a peaceful warrior's hunger for justice becoming an indelible stain on the democratic conscience.

Read more

See All Articles    « Previously

See All Articles

The Great Ayodhya Heist: Faith, Loot, and the Complicit Silence of the Powerful

The Ram Temple in Ayodhya was supposed to be the crowning glory of a cultural renaissance, a symbol of Hindu pride and unity. Instead, it has become the stage for one of the most brazen spiritual swindles in modern Indian history. What began as whispers of financial mismanagement has, in recent weeks, erupted into a full-blown scandal involving cash, gold, diamonds, silver, land frauds, and an audacious cover-up that reaches the highest echelons of power. This is not just a story about a few rogue officials skimming donations; it is a devastating indictment of a system where faith is monetised, and those who dare question the plunder are silenced or ignored.

The outrage is visceral. When Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal visited Ayodhya on June 25 to offer prayers, it triggered a cascade of revelations that had long been suppressed. Hours after his visit, a hurried FIR was lodged against a handful of low-level operatives — eight small-time players who are clearly scapegoats. But the real question, the one that haunts millions of devotees, is this: where did the hundreds of crores in cash, the tonnes of silver, the ornaments, the diamonds, and the sheer avalanche of donations actually go? And why is the government, which built its entire political identity around Lord Ram, doing everything it can to shield the masterminds?

The Shock That Shattered a Nation’s Faith

For decades, devout Hindus across India and the diaspora poured their life savings into the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. They sold land, jewellery, and household goods, believing they were contributing to a sacred cause. The trust built to oversee the temple’s construction was handed to a coterie of ideologues and bureaucrats handpicked by the ruling dispensation. And for years, that trust operated in absolute opacity — no audits, no receipts, no accountability.

Consider the case of the Sindhi Association, which donated 200 kilograms of silver on January 26, 2021. They never received a receipt, and they never pushed for one. Like countless others, they placed their trust in the divine. Now that reports of monstrous fraud surface, that trust has shattered. They are not alone. Everyday worshipers who once contributed an average of Rs 12–14 lakh daily to the temple’s donation boxes have been withdrawing their faith in the form of currency: daily collections have plummeted to less than Rs 1 lakh since the scandal broke. The message is unmistakable — if the keepers of the temple cannot respect the sanctity of offerings, the offerings will stop.

The Anatomy of a Donation Scam

Reportedly, the thefts were not limited to cash boxes. According to multiple testimonies and media investigations, Lord Ram’s jewelry — necklaces, crowns, and even the holy sandals — were pilfered. Silver, gold, diamonds, and precious gems donated by millions vanished without a trace. The sheer scale suggests a systematic, top-down operation. One does not simply walk out of a heavily guarded temple complex with truckloads of precious metals unless there is complicity at the highest level.

But the fraud extends far beyond the temple’s sanctum. The land acquisition process for the temple and its associated projects reveals a pattern of breathtaking corruption. Take the case of Harish Pathak, a local landowner. On March 18, 2021, he sold 1.25 hectares of land for Rs 2 crore to two individuals connected to the party that controls the trust. Within ten minutes — literally ten minutes — the same land was purchased by the temple trust for Rs 18 crore. A clean profit of Rs 16 crore was siphoned off in a single transaction. This is not an isolated incident. Similar land deals have been reported where properties were bought at absurdly inflated prices, with the difference flowing into private pockets. The trust acted as a money-laundering laundromat for party loyalists.

Construction: A Bonanza of Kickbacks

If the land scams were the appetizer, the main course was the temple construction itself. Whistleblowers and opposition leaders allege that every tender awarded for building the Ram Temple carried a hefty commission. What should have cost Rs 2 was billed at Rs 20; what could have been built for Rs 10 was contracted at exorbitant sums. The temple’s magnificence was built on a foundation of inflated contracts and backroom deals. The beneficiaries are not obscure contractors — they are individuals with deep political connections who have long enjoyed the patronage of the ruling establishment.

The Astonishing Cover-Up

When the scale of the loot began dribbling into the public domain, the reaction from those responsible was not to investigate but to destruct evidence. Eight months of CCTV footage from the temple complex — recordings that would have shown who entered, who carried what, and when — were mysteriously deleted. In any normal theft case, preserving CCTV data is the first step. Here, the disappearance of the footage is itself a confession. It demonstrates that the crime goes all the way to the top, and those at the top are desperate to ensure no trail leads back to them.

The hurriedly constituted Special Investigation Team (SIT) and the subsequent FIR are a farce. The accused are low-level functionaries — small fry who will be sacrificed to appease public anger. No big names, no trustees, no political heavyweights. The message is clear: the system will protect its own. When the Prime Minister’s Office itself reportedly sought financial records from Champat Rai, the powerful general secretary of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, Rai flatly refused. And the PMO backed off without a reminder. This is unprecedented. In a democracy, when a trust defies the Prime Minister and nothing happens, who is actually running the country? What does Champat Rai possess that makes even Modi helpless? The silence screams of a deep, mutual hostage-taking — a nexus of secrets that binds the most powerful figures in the land.

Political Complicity: The Modi-Yogi Paradox

The Bharatiya Janata Party, which rode to power on the Ram wave and has weaponised Hindu identity for three decades, now finds itself in an acute moral crisis. Despite the mountain of evidence and public rage, not a single senior leader of the party has condemned the donation theft. Not one word of criticism from the Prime Minister, the Home Minister, or the UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. The party that claims to be the custodian of Hindu honour has chosen to protect donation thieves over the sentiments of the very devotees who voted them into power.

Yogi Adityanath’s position is particularly damning. As the Chief Minister, he controls the state machinery that could order a real investigation. Instead, he is reportedly facing pressure from the same corrupt network that is now plotting to remove him. His silence is a betrayal of the saintly image he projects. The sages and sadhus who have managed Hanuman Garhi for centuries without a whisper of corruption stand in stark contrast. The Ram Temple should have been handed over to genuine religious leaders, not to politicians and bureaucrats who treat it as a personal fiefdom.

There is a deeper political message here. The scam reveals that for the BJP, Ram is not a deity but a vote-gathering mascot. When the party needed power, it shouted “Ram Lalla hum aayenge, mandir wahi banayenge.” Now that the temple is built, it has become a trough for the party’s cronies. If you can loot the abode of the god you claim to revere, what won’t you loot? As a wise surgeon from Bihar quipped after visiting Ayodhya, “Those who did not spare Ram, will they spare the nation?”

The Destination of Plundered Wealth

The most unsettling question remains unanswered: where did the hundreds of crores go? The cash, the gold, the diamonds did not end up in the pockets of eight small-time accused. They were merely instruments. The trail inexorably leads out of Ayodhya, into the labyrinths of political funding and black money. Investigative journalists have hinted at links to shell companies, offshore accounts, and election war chests. The donation scam is not just about personal greed; it is a mechanism for syphoning unaccounted wealth to sustain a political machine.

This is not merely a law-and-order problem; it is a wound on the collective Hindu psyche. Millions feel violated. The demand across the community is unambiguous: the real perpetrators, the “rakshasas” who orchestrated this heist, must be brought to justice and punished with the harshest possible sentence. But the administration, from the Prime Minister down, is acting as a shield. The SIT is not an investigation; it is a burial of truth.

What Does Justice Look Like?

The only way to restore faith is radical transparency and institutional cleansing. The current trust, packed with politicians and retired bureaucrats, must be dissolved. The temple’s management should be transferred to a body of authentic dharmacharyas, sadhus, and saintly figures — people whose lives are dedicated to spiritual service, not political patronage. Every land deal, tender, and donation since the trust’s inception must be independently audited by a Supreme Court-monitored panel. The missing CCTV footage must be forensically retrieved; if it cannot be, that itself must become grounds for a criminal conspiracy charge against the trustees.

Until then, the devotees who have been robbed both materially and spiritually will continue to demand: hang the thieves, and their political patrons, on the banks of the Sarayu. Lord Ram, after all, is known for upholding maryada. Those who have defiled his temple have forsaken all maryada. The faithful will not rest until justice is served.

Facts

• The Sindhi Association donated 200 kg of silver in January 2021 and never received a receipt; they now feel betrayed.
• Daily temple donations averaged Rs 12–14 lakh; after the scandal broke, they dropped below Rs 1 lakh.
• On March 18, 2021, Harish Pathak sold 1.25 hectares for Rs 2 crore to BJP-linked individuals; within 10 minutes, the trust bought the same land for Rs 18 crore — a Rs 16 crore scam.
• Multiple allegations of kickbacks in construction tenders inflated costs by multiples.
• CCTV footage for eight months was deleted, destroying crucial evidence.
• The PMO sought financial records from Champat Rai, who refused; no follow-up was made.
• An FIR was filed only against eight minor individuals, with no senior trustees or politicians named.
• Not a single senior BJP leader has publicly condemned the donation theft.

Criticisms

• The Modi government has actively shielded the corrupt trust by refusing to order a genuine high-level probe, eroding the very Hindu faith it claims to represent.
• The BJP has exposed its hypocrisy: it used Lord Ram to capture power but now turns a blind eye while his temple is looted by party insiders.
• Champat Rai’s brazen refusal to share records with the PMO, and the PMO’s meek acceptance, suggests that Modi is either complicit or powerless against the entrenched corruption in his own ideological ecosystem.
• Yogi Adityanath’s silence and administrative inaction amount to collusion; a saint-turned-politician who cannot protect the sanctity of a temple has failed his core duty.
• The media, especially pro-establishment outlets, have underplayed the scandal to protect the government’s image, betraying journalistic ethics.
• The entire Ram Janmabhoomi trust is a political arrangement, not a spiritual one; its members are unaccountable cronies of the ruling party, lacking any moral authority.
• The deletion of CCTV evidence and the fake SIT reveal a pattern of systemic obstruction reminiscent of authoritarian regimes, not a democracy rooted in rule of law.
• The BJP’s demand for harsh punishment for corruption in other parties rings hollow when it constructs an elaborate shield around its own temple looters.

Bengal's Democracy in Danger (Speech by Arvind Kejriwal)

See All on Politics    <<< Previously    Next >>>

Democracy  ·  West Bengal  ·  Electoral Integrity

Bengal's Democracy
Under Fire

How the systematic erasure of 27 lakh voters, the deployment of central forces as political instruments, and a government addicted to false promises is dismantling the foundational architecture of Indian democracy — one election at a time.

OPINION  ·  ELECTIONS  ·  INDIA POLITICS

There is a particular kind of violence that leaves no blood on the floor. It happens in spreadsheets, in administrative offices, in the quiet deletion of names from voter rolls. It is bureaucratic violence — and it may be the most dangerous kind a democracy can face, because it is designed to look like paperwork.

What is unfolding in West Bengal is not simply a state election. It is a referendum on whether India's federal democracy will survive the weight of a centralising, fear-driven political machine that has turned the apparatus of the state — the Central Bureau of Investigation, the Enforcement Directorate, the Central Armed Police Forces — into instruments of partisan warfare.

A State Besieged

The BJP's decision to flood Bengal with Central Forces is not a neutral act of security management. It is a political statement wrapped in the language of law and order. For a state whose people gave India some of its most iconic freedom fighters — Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, Khudiram Bose, and an entire generation of young men and women who sacrificed everything for independence — having your streets patrolled by centrally-controlled armed forces at election time carries a specific and sinister resonance.

This is not protection. This is pressure. The deployment of Central Forces in numbers disproportionate to any genuine security need sends a message to Bengali voters: we are watching you. The government that spent decades wrapping itself in the tricolour is now using the institutions that tricolour represents to suppress the very democratic participation that makes the flag meaningful.

"Sending the entire army against a civilian electorate is not an act of security — it is an act of intimidation dressed in khaki."

Bengal has its own culture, its own language, its own intellectual and artistic legacy that stretches back centuries. An assault on its electoral sovereignty is an assault on Bengali identity itself. When you tell a Bengali that their vote will be watched, supervised, and second-guessed by forces dispatched from New Delhi, you are telling them that they are not trusted citizens of a democracy — they are suspects.

The 27 Lakh Who Were Erased

Here is a number that should stop every thinking Indian cold: 27 lakh voters — 2.7 million people — have allegedly been removed from Bengal's electoral rolls ahead of the election. Not disqualified through any transparent process. Not relocated. Simply gone.

27 Lakh

Voters allegedly removed from Bengal's electoral rolls

To grasp the scale of what this means: there are entire countries on this planet whose total population is smaller than 27 lakh people. Families are reporting the surreal experience of watching their household split across the democratic ledger — a mother listed, a father listed, but a son's name simply absent. These are people who have lived in Bengal for generations, who pay taxes, who breathe the same air as everyone else, and who have now been told, in effect, that they do not exist as citizens.

The voter roll is not a technicality. It is the foundation of democratic participation. Strip a person from the voter roll and you have not merely inconvenienced them — you have severed their formal relationship with the republic. You have rendered them politically invisible. Without the right to vote, what entitlement does a citizen have to government services, to welfare schemes, to the basic protections of the state? This erasure is not administrative error. Its scale makes that impossible to believe.

Ghost Voters from Across the Country

The picture darkens further when allegations are examined of fake voters being transported into Bengal from Kerala, Chennai, and Goa to cast ballots in the names of Bengali residents — the very residents who have been removed from the rolls. If these allegations are accurate, the architecture of fraud is staggeringly complete: real names are deleted from one end, and manufactured votes are inserted from the other.

This is not democracy. This is a managed outcome. It is the substitution of public will with engineered arithmetic. Every fake vote cast is a theft — not just from a political party, but from every Indian who believes that elections are the mechanism through which the people hold power accountable. When that mechanism is sabotaged, nothing downstream from it can be trusted.

A Prime Minister the World Laughs At

Any serious accounting of the BJP's Bengal campaign must grapple with the condition of its leadership at the national level. Narendra Modi's international standing — once carefully stage-managed through grand gestures and theatrical foreign visits — has visibly deteriorated. India's Prime Minister has been on the receiving end of public humiliation from the leadership of the world's most powerful nation, without offering a syllable of response.

That silence is not dignity. It is weakness — the weakness of a leader whose foreign policy consists of personal rapport with strongmen, a rapport that evaporates the moment it becomes geopolitically inconvenient. A Prime Minister who cannot defend his country's honour on the world stage is not projecting strength. He is demonstrating, in real time, the hollowness at the centre of a political identity built entirely on the performance of toughness.

Meanwhile, the domestic record speaks for itself. Unemployment, price rise, the systematic erosion of institutional independence — the list is long and the government's answers short. What has compensated for this failure is not governance but narrative: a permanent election campaign, a permanent enemy, a permanent state of manufactured outrage to keep attention away from outcomes.

The Woman They Cannot Break

Against this machinery stands Mamata Banerjee — a small woman who walks kilometers on foot through constituencies while the full force of the central government tries to destroy her. The ED investigates. The CBI knocks. Central Ministers descend on Bengal in waves. And she keeps walking.

Whatever one's political preferences, there is something that commands respect in that image. The BJP has deployed more ministerial resources against a single state Chief Minister than it has deployed in managing several national crises. The disproportionality of that effort is itself an admission: she matters. The people she represents matter. And the BJP is afraid of both.

The Welfare War: Promises vs. Delivery

The pattern is consistent and documented: where welfare schemes exist and benefit ordinary people, the BJP works to dismantle them. Free bus rides for women in Delhi — ended. Free electricity units — threatened. The monthly cash transfer to women under AAP — the existence of which was proven possible — was promised by Modi at ₹2,000 per month during Delhi elections in February. By the following March, not a rupee had appeared in any account.

Now, in Bengal, the promise has been inflated to ₹3,000. The logic of the BJP's welfare politics is not distributive — it is extractive. The same government that cannot fulfill its own promised transfers has a robust history of freezing accounts, redirecting funds, and ensuring that the people who most need state support remain dependent on a government that has mastered the art of promising without delivering.

Bengal's women receive ₹1,500 per month under the state government's scheme. That is real money in real accounts right now. The question for every voter is not which party makes the larger promise — it is which government has a track record of actually fulfilling one.

---

▸ Facts

• West Bengal has historically had some of the highest voter turnout figures in Indian general and state elections, making any systematic manipulation of voter rolls particularly consequential.
• The Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) are deployed in elections across India under the direction of the Election Commission, but the scale of deployment in Bengal has been repeatedly flagged as extraordinary compared to other large states.
• Subhas Chandra Bose and Khudiram Bose, both Bengalis, are among the most celebrated figures of India's independence movement. Bose led the Indian National Army; Khudiram Bose was hanged by the British at age 18.
• The Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) operate under the Union government, and their use in states governed by opposition parties has been the subject of widespread criticism from former judges, legal scholars, and constitutional experts.
• AAP's Delhi government had implemented free bus rides for women and subsidised electricity slabs, both of which have faced disruption or reversal following BJP's return to power in Delhi.
• India's Election Commission is constitutionally mandated to be independent, but critics — including former Chief Election Commissioners — have raised concerns about the body's autonomy during the current political period.
• Voter list manipulation through bogus deletions and additions is an established concern in Indian elections, and the Election Commission has standing mechanisms to address grievances — though their effectiveness in high-stakes contests is disputed.

✕ Criticisms

• The Modi government has systematically weaponised central investigative agencies — the ED, CBI, and Income Tax department — against opposition-led state governments and opposition politicians, a practice that corrodes institutional independence and turns the instruments of justice into political tools.
• The alleged deletion of 27 lakh voters from Bengal's rolls represents, if accurate, one of the most consequential acts of electoral manipulation in recent Indian democratic history, and demands a full independent judicial inquiry rather than administrative deflection.
• Modi's pattern of welfare promises during elections — ₹2,000 for Delhi women, ₹15 lakh in everyone's account, jobs for two crore youth annually — without any intention or mechanism of delivery constitutes a sustained, documented pattern of electoral deception that undermines the informed consent of voters.
• The deployment of Central Forces into Bengal at a scale inconsistent with genuine security needs functions as voter intimidation, disproportionately affecting communities who have historically faced state pressure — a practice incompatible with free and fair elections.
• The BJP's leadership has shown zero accountability for India's declining press freedom rankings, the weakening of judicial independence, and the institutional capture of bodies that are constitutionally required to be non-partisan.
• Modi's failure to respond to public humiliation from a foreign head of government — while simultaneously cultivating an image of nationalist toughness domestically — exposes the fundamental dishonesty of a political persona built on performative strength that evaporates under real diplomatic pressure.
• The BJP's approach to Bengal specifically — framing a cultural, linguistic, and politically distinct state as a problem to be solved through central intervention — reflects a dangerous majoritarian impulse that threatens India's federal compact and the autonomy of states that the Constitution explicitly guarantees.

OPINION PIECE  ·  The arguments and criticisms expressed in this article represent the author's own analysis and editorial perspective. Allegations regarding voter roll deletions and fake voter deployments are drawn from statements made during the Bengal election period and remain subject to judicial and electoral scrutiny. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources and independent reporting for further verification.

LPG Crisis Sparks Political Firestorm as Arvind Kejriwal Targets Modi’s Foreign Policy

See All on Politics    <<< Previously    Next >>>

Kejriwal Blames Modi’s Foreign Policy for LPG Crisis, Accuses PM of “Dragging India into Global Conflict”

As India grapples with a severe shortage of LPG cooking gas, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has launched a fierce attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, accusing him of abandoning India’s traditional diplomatic neutrality and pushing the country into a geopolitical crisis that is now hurting ordinary citizens and businesses.

Speaking about the rapidly developing situation, Kejriwal warned that the LPG shortage could lead to widespread economic disruption, including the closure of thousands of restaurants and factories and the possible loss of over one crore jobs.

But beyond the immediate economic consequences, Kejriwal placed the blame squarely on what he described as “reckless foreign policy decisions” taken by the Modi government.

---

LPG Supply Shock Hits the Country

Kejriwal explained that India depends heavily on imported LPG. Around 60% of the country’s LPG supply is imported, and nearly 90% of those imports pass through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

With tensions escalating in the Middle East involving Iran, Israel, and the United States, shipments through the route have reportedly been disrupted for India.

According to Kejriwal, the result is a dramatic supply shock.

“Nearly 90% of our imported LPG has effectively stopped, which means the country’s total supply has dropped by around 50–55%,” he said.

Restaurants and hotels have been hit first because they rely on daily LPG deliveries and cannot stockpile cylinders due to safety rules.

In Mumbai, he said, about 20% of restaurants have already shut down, and that number could reach 50% within days if supplies do not resume. In Tamil Nadu, nearly 10,000 hotels and restaurants are reportedly on the verge of closure. Similar disruptions are expected in Punjab and Delhi NCR, he warned.

The timing could not be worse, he added, pointing out that the crisis has struck during India’s peak wedding season, when the hospitality sector is typically at its busiest.

Industrial regions could soon follow. Kejriwal cited Morbi in Gujarat, a major tile manufacturing hub, where hundreds of factories depend on gas supplies.

“If industries shut down at this scale, more than one crore people could suddenly lose their jobs,” he warned.

---

“India Had No Stake in This War”

However, Kejriwal argued that the root cause of the crisis lies not only in global conflict but in what he described as a major diplomatic blunder by the Modi government.

According to him, India historically followed a policy of neutrality through the Non-Aligned Movement, maintaining balanced relations even during major global conflicts.

Kejriwal accused Modi of abandoning that tradition.

“India had no stake in this war,” he said. “We should not have taken sides. But the Prime Minister chose to stand openly with Israel and the United States.”

He specifically criticized Modi for visiting Israel and publicly embracing its leadership shortly before tensions escalated.

“Why did the Prime Minister go to Israel just a day before the conflict intensified?” Kejriwal asked. “Why did he publicly hug its leadership at such a sensitive moment? Those actions signaled that India had chosen a side.”

According to him, this shift alienated Iran — a country he described as a long-time partner of India.

---

“India Being Reduced to an American Colony”

Kejriwal’s sharpest remarks were directed at what he called India’s growing dependence on Washington.

He alleged that Modi has increasingly aligned India’s policies with those of former U.S. President Donald Trump, even when it harms India’s own economic interests.

“Prime Minister Modi has made the mistake of turning India into an American colony,” Kejriwal said.

He cited the earlier decision to reduce oil purchases from Russia under U.S. pressure, arguing that the move damaged industries and agriculture across India.

“Millions of farmers suffered, industries shut down, and jobs were lost — all because the government followed Washington’s instructions,” he claimed.

Kejriwal went further, accusing Modi of humiliating India on the global stage.

“Every day, small officials in America mock India and our Prime Minister on television,” he said. “The country that once commanded respect around the world is now being treated like a subordinate.”

---

A Call for Accountability

Kejriwal concluded with a direct challenge to the prime minister, demanding that India’s foreign policy be guided by national interests rather than external pressure.

“If there are compulsions or secrets forcing the Prime Minister to act this way, he should resign,” Kejriwal said.

“India’s foreign policy should serve the interests of 140 crore Indians — not the interests of another country.”

With the LPG crisis escalating and geopolitical tensions still unfolding, Kejriwal’s remarks are likely to intensify the political debate over India’s foreign policy and its economic consequences at home.

Tags: Hindi,Video,Arvind Kejriwal,Indian Politics,

Your Government, Not Theirs -- A Wake-Up Call to Change the System from the Ground Up

See All on Politics    <<< Previously    Next >>>

This Wasn’t Just a Speech Against the BJP. It Was a Call to Break Gujarat’s Political Habit

Arvind Kejriwal’s Gandhinagar speech was built around one central argument: Gujarat does not just need a different ruling party, it needs a different political culture. At the conclusion of AAP’s “Parivartan Lao, Kisan Bachao Yatra,” he tried to turn a farmers’ agitation into something larger—a referendum on fear, corruption, dynastic politics, paper leaks, and the feeling that ordinary people are expected to suffer quietly while political elites prosper. The rally itself followed a march led by AAP’s Gujarat leaders, including Isudan Gadhvi, Pravin Ram, and Manoj Sorathiya, from Somnath to Gandhinagar. youtube.com+2ahmedabadmirror.com+2

The Speech Began in the Villages, Not on the Stage

The emotional foundation of the speech was the farmer. Again and again, the message returned to the same picture: villages under stress, farmers unable to get fair prices, rising costs everywhere, shortages of drinking water and irrigation water, and a government that has ruled for three decades but, in his telling, has failed to solve the most basic problems. The point was not subtle. If Gujarat is really progressing, he asked, then why are farmers still in pain? Why are young people still unemployed? Why do women, traders, and workers still feel squeezed?

That is what gave the speech its force. It did not present “development” as something visible in advertisements or speeches. It judged development from the ground up. Kejriwal’s line of attack was that the celebrated Gujarat model looks very different when seen from a farm, a struggling household, or a student’s future. In that telling, prosperity has not vanished; it has merely become selective. The people rising are not ordinary Gujaratis, but politicians and networks of power. Ahmedabad Mirror+2english.punjabkesari.com+2

Fear, Jail, and the Politics of Intimidation

One of the sharpest parts of the speech was his attempt to connect state power with public fear. He invoked the Botad episode and the imprisonment of farmers and AAP leaders to argue that the government wants to send a message: raise your voice, and you will be crushed. He framed the jailing of Pravin Ram and others not as an isolated legal matter, but as political intimidation aimed at the wider farming community. Recent reporting on the Botad case confirms that Pravin Ram was among AAP leaders jailed for more than 100 days after the clash linked to the farmers’ protest. indianexpress.com

He used the same template to speak about Chaitar Vasava, presenting him as someone punished for exposing corruption in MGNREGA-related works. That allegation has been a repeated AAP talking point around Vasava’s arrest. In the speech, the argument was clear: those who expose wrongdoing are jailed, while those who loot the system are protected. Whether he was speaking about farmers, opposition leaders, or himself, the pattern he wanted the audience to see was the same—power in Gujarat does not merely govern, it intimidates. ThePrint+2The Indian Express+2

Delhi and Punjab as His Counter-Example

Kejriwal then moved to the standard AAP contrast: look at what happened when people in Delhi and Punjab stopped rotating between familiar parties and decided to back what he called their “own government.” In his telling, Delhi changed when people stopped accepting Congress-BJP alternation and voted for a government that responded directly to public demands. Punjab, he argued, did the same by rejecting older formations and making Bhagwant Mann, “a farmer’s son,” chief minister.

This part of the speech was not just about governance; it was about possibility. He wanted Gujaratis to believe that power can be rearranged. Free electricity for farmers, better public services, and direct assistance to women were presented as proof that an alternative is not theoretical. Notably, the Punjab government did announce in its 2026 budget a monthly cash-transfer scheme for adult women, which is the announcement he referenced from the stage. hindustantimes.com+1

Not Just Change the Party—Change the System

The most politically effective line in the speech was also the broadest: don’t just change the party, change the system. That allowed him to position both the BJP and Congress as part of the same structure. His accusation was blunt: ordinary people keep voting, pleading, and waiting, while politicians across party lines grow richer, more insulated, and more arrogant. Elections come and go, promises are made, photos are clicked, and after that the voter is forgotten.

This is where the speech widened beyond farmers. Paper leaks became part of the same argument. So did liquor prohibition on paper versus open illegality in practice. So did unemployment, drugs, and the claim that those running the state cannot even conduct an honest exam. Each example fed the same moral conclusion: the system is not malfunctioning by accident; it is working for the wrong people.

That is also why he brought up nepotism so aggressively. His attack on Jay Shah’s rise in cricket administration was meant as a shorthand for inherited access. His larger point was that jobs, tickets, power, and positions circulate within political families, while ordinary families are told to keep clapping from the sidelines. englishpunjabkesari+1

A “People’s Government” Versus Family Rule

In the final stretch, Kejriwal tried to turn anger into ownership. He contrasted dynastic politics with a party structure that, he claimed, gives space to people from ordinary backgrounds. That is why he named leaders such as Isudan Gadhvi, Gopal Italia, Chaitar Vasava, Hemant Khava, Pravin Ram, and Manoj Sorathiya—not just as politicians, but as proof that public life does not have to remain a family inheritance. Some of those leaders are indeed identified publicly with non-dynastic backgrounds, including Isudan Gadhvi’s journalism career and Gopal Italia’s earlier job as a police constable. Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3

That is what the “janata ki sarkar” pitch was really about. He was asking voters to stop behaving like petitioners and start thinking of themselves as owners. The slogan may have been electoral, but the emotional appeal was deeper: dignity. A government that listens. Offices where ordinary people are treated with respect. A politics in which power does not belong to party bosses, wealthy fixers, or political heirs.

In the end, the speech was a call to break Gujarat’s long habit of choosing between the same two poles. Kejriwal’s wager was that frustration in the state has become broad enough to be welded into a new political identity—farmer, youth, woman, trader, worker, all folded into the idea of a government that belongs to the people who vote for it. Whether that wager succeeds is a question for the ballot box. But the speech made one thing unmistakably clear: he does not want this election framed as BJP versus AAP. He wants it framed as system versus people. englishpunjabkesari+1